Critics’ reviews

Barton Fink (1991)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 69: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Barton Fink

69
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to Barton Fink, with praise clustering around the Coens’ visual control, literate writing and performances. John Turturro and John Goodman receive repeated attention, while Michael Lerner’s studio mogul is another source of approval. The favourable reviews find the mixture of Hollywood satire, psychological unease and absurd comedy assured, with several seeing a sharp attack on writers whose concern for ordinary people exceeds their willingness to listen to them.

The spread is wide, however, and the central disagreement concerns how much the film has to say beneath its elaborate style. The Guardian admires its imagination but questions its substance, while the Los Angeles Times finds it amusing without being convinced that it adds up. The New Yorker is more firmly opposed, treating the allusions and twists as empty display. Even some sympathetic reviews therefore share the sceptics’ reservations about what all that technique achieves.

Empire
1 January 1991 · Phil Thomas
85*

The critic lauds the performances from Turturro, Goodman and others along with the Coens' visual flair and literate screenplay. It singles out the film's subtle critique of arrogant, self-absorbed writers who fail to engage with the 'common man'.

Read the full review →
Time Out
3 May 2011 · GA
85*

The review describes the film as a bizarre blend of brooding psychodrama and screwball satire that shifts into outrageous Gothic fantasy. It praises the Coens' superb writing and assured direction along with a roster of marvellous performances that make everything cohere on multiple levels.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

The critic calls it the most brilliantly observed Hollywood put-down since Day of the Locust and a vitriolic yet successful attack on the industry. It singles out the gorgeously designed paranoid parable packed with sharp detail, great in-jokes and Michael Lerner's Oscar-nominated turn as the studio mogul from hell.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
23 August 1991 · Roger Ebert
75*

Ebert finds the film an assured piece of comic filmmaking that warns about the perils of talented filmmakers heading to Hollywood, but not one of the greatest ever made. He singles out the visual style and performances, particularly those evoking the rise of Nazism in its subtext.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 February 1992 · Derek Malcolm
65*

The critic finds Barton Fink the Coens' most accomplished film, praising its style, imagination, and cinematic illustration of the writer's dilemma, but notes it is heavy on movie references and uncertain content with little substance.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
13 September 1991 · Kenneth Turan
50*

Turan finds the film an enormously amusing crackpot take on Hollywood but questions whether it adds up to anything substantial. He singles out its brazen assurance and the ambivalence it provokes in viewers as its core effect.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
2 September 1991 · Terrence Rafferty
35*

Rafferty views the film as an empty tour de force and a nihilist showoff exercise that feels thin despite its allusions and twists. He singles out its hermetic meaninglessness and the Coens' apparent pleasure in it as the main flaw.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
21 August 1991 · Vincent Canby

Canby calls it an unqualified winner and an exhilarating original after the Coens' earlier films. He singles out its flamboyant style, effortless technique, and the way performances merge seamlessly with the characters in this dark comedy about the perils of the mind.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1990 · Variety Staff

The review praises the film as a painstakingly miniaturist work full of ferocious strength and humor that will appeal to buffs. It singles out the sensational performances, especially Michael Lerner's studio overlord and John Goodman's neighbor.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
21 June 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
85*

The critic praises the Coen brothers' maverick originality in depicting a naive playwright's descent into frustration and absurdity while struggling to write a B-movie in 1940s Hollywood. Turturro and Goodman's performances and the eerie, humid atmosphere of the hotel are singled out as complements to the film's surprising, dangerous tone.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate