Critics’ reviews

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 77: 12 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

77
Positive
12
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics like it, and nearly all of them like it for the same reason. Sean Connery as Henry Jones Sr, bickering with Harrison Ford’s Indy, is named as the film’s chief pleasure in almost every review, credited with giving the adventure a heart the series had not shown before. Several call it a return to form after Temple of Doom and a fitting close to the trilogy. The Venice catacombs, the desert tank chase and the River Phoenix prologue also draw regular praise.

The reservations cluster on familiarity. A number of reviews note that the film reruns the shape of Raiders of the Lost Ark, and a few think it does so with less energy. The New Yorker finds it enjoyable but repetitive, Slant Magazine calls it a solid, transitional entry short on dynamism, and the Los Angeles Times suggests the genre itself is running down. The spread is narrow: no review is negative, and even the doubters concede the Connery-Ford double act.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · John Ferguson
100

The series is restored to form after Temple of Doom thanks to the inspired pairing of Harrison Ford and Sean Connery as father and son. Spielberg delivers epic-scale action with panache, highlighted by the young Indy prologue featuring River Phoenix.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
24 May 1989 · Caryn James
90*

The review finds the film nearly as good as the first in the series and a strong finale, with the father-son pairing providing resonance and depth. It singles out Sean Connery’s presence for giving the adventure emotional shading and turning it into an ultimate quest story.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Bob McCabe
80*

The film is the most entertaining entry in the series and a fitting end to the Indy trilogy, though it does not quite match Raiders. The standout element is the interplay and chemistry between Harrison Ford and Sean Connery as father and son.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
12 March 2024 · ★★★★ · William Mata
80

The critic praises Sean Connery's perfect portrayal of Henry Jones Sr as both a genius archaeologist and bumbling dad, highlighting the strong odd-couple chemistry with Indiana Jones and the satisfying conclusion to the original trilogy. They single out Connery as the standout element everyone remembers, noting the film's cheesy but enjoyable family-oriented adventures and River Phoenix's cameo.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
24 May 1989 · Roger Ebert
80*

The critic finds delight in the film's pulp-adventure spirit and set pieces like the Venice catacombs and desert tank chase, while praising Sean Connery's turn as Indy's father and Harrison Ford's easy charisma. A shade of disappointment stems from the material no longer feeling new after Raiders of the Lost Ark.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CM
80*

The film recaptures the spirit of Raiders of the Lost Ark with its action set pieces and globe-trotting adventure. The standout element is Sean Connery as Indy's father, whose sparring relationship with Harrison Ford provides the emotional core and prevents the movie feeling like pure déjà vu.

Read the full review →
Variety
24 May 1989 · Joseph McBride
80*

The review calls it more cerebral than prior entries and a moving, literate adventure with unexpected emotional depth. It singles out the Harrison Ford-Sean Connery father-and-son team for giving the film real heart and a touching finale.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
24 May 1989 · Sheila Benson
70*

The review says Indiana quits at the top of the heap even as the genre feels mechanical and on the wane. It singles out the Harrison Ford-Sean Connery father-son chemistry for delivering affection and acerbic moments amid the action.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 May 2008 · Jeremiah Kipp
50*

The critic finds the film a solid but transitional effort lacking the energy of predecessors, praising the father-son dynamic between Indy and his dad. They single out the chemistry between Ford and Connery for praise while complaining about overkill in the prologue and lack of dynamism.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
5 June 1989 · Pauline Kael
50*

The review calls the film enjoyable but a familiar, repetitive rehash that lacks the original thrill of earlier entries. It singles out the Connery-Ford father-son interplay and clowning for providing the main spark and personality.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
3 August 2007 · Jennie Kermode
90*

The critic praises the film as a rollicking good ride and near-perfect cinematic adventure with superb pacing, thrilling soundtrack, and charismatic performances, especially from Harrison Ford and Sean Connery. She singles out the stunning locations like ancient Petra and the emotional father-son relationship for praise while noting it can feel too twee in its references to earlier films.

Read the full review →
Film Stories
28 June 2023 · A J Black
85*

The critic argues that Last Crusade is the most elegant Indiana Jones film, praising its inter-generational father-son story and emotional heart. They single out the chemistry between Harrison Ford and Sean Connery, and the script's wit and set pieces, as making it a standout with the biggest heart in the series.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
30 January 2014 · Simon Brew
80*

The critic finds the film the lightest and funniest in the series, with the father-son dynamic between Indy and Henry Jones Sr. as its standout strength and a source of comedy and emotional depth. The action and humor entertain greatly overall, though it falls short of Raiders of the Lost Ark in narrative tightness and control.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
7 January 2019 · Adam Nayman
75*

The critic views the film as a sweet, reassuring entry that adds a father-son origin story with Sean Connery, making it the most emotionally grounded of the series. He praises the literal ride-into-the-sunset ending while noting it functions as a near-remake of the first film with fewer standout villains.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate