Critics’ reviews

Mrs. Doubtfire (1993)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 63: 4 positive, 3 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Mrs. Doubtfire

63
Positive
4
Mixed
3
Negative
1

The consensus leans favourable, with Robin Williams receiving the most consistent praise, even from critics who find the film thin. The reviews single out his mimicry, improvisation and comic detail as the disguised father, while warmer assessments credit him with conveying the pain behind the farce. Radio Times also praises Chris Columbus for keeping Williams’ exuberance under control and making the comic set pieces work. For the film’s admirers, that combination makes accessible family comedy out of a painful separation.

The disagreement concerns how much the performance compensates for the writing. Reservations cluster around sentimentality, sluggish pacing and a sitcom approach that gives the premise too little depth. Some critics accept those weaknesses as the price of the laughs; others find the entertainment too safe. RogerEbert.com offers a distinctly negative assessment, arguing that the film drags and falls short of its premise, with an unfavourable comparison to Tootsie.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
80*

The reviewer notes that despite some uncalled-for sentimentality in the second half, the film remains a laugh riot thanks to Robin Williams' performance as the nanny in disguise.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · David Parkinson
80

This is family entertainment par excellence, with Robin Williams delivering one of his best performances as the disguised father. Director Chris Columbus is praised for controlling Williams' exuberance while highlighting strong set pieces like the quick-change restaurant scene.

Read the full review →
Variety
28 November 1993 · Brian Lowry
70*

Finds it overly sappy and too long but provides a slick showcase for Williams' shtick with broad family appeal, mixing comedy and messages about family.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TCh
60*

The critic describes the film as sitcom-like with laboured farcical interludes and a mushy post-feminist sensibility. Williams' performance as the nanny is singled out as the source of its fun despite the flaws.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
24 November 1993 · Kenneth Turan
50*

Notes the film's commercial success due to Williams but laments his shift from anarchic comedy to warm and cuddly roles, calling it a safe and sane but unadventurous entertainment.

Read the full review →
The Independent
28 January 1994
50*

The critic finds Mrs Doubtfire a lightweight creation despite the brilliant mimicry of the disguise, comparing it unfavorably to Tootsie for lacking dramatic mileage in the central character. Other elements like the wife and rival are sharper, and the film is seen as Hollywood liberalism that avoids easy resolutions.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
24 November 1993 · Roger Ebert
40*

The critic finds the film not as amusing as the premise, with long stretches that drag, comparing it unfavorably to Tootsie as having sitcom values and depth.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
22 November 1993 · Duane Byrge

The critic calls the film a warm, uplifting holiday comedy that should be a major hit, blending broad slapstick with pointed drama about a family's painful separation. Robin Williams delivers a standout dual performance as the father and the nanny, showing both his hyperkinetic humor and the pain beneath it, with strong support from the cast and director Chris Columbus.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
24 November 1993 · Critic’s Pick · Janet Maslin

Praises Robin Williams' genius for details and improvisation but criticizes the film for spending too much time making nice and not enough making sense, with a simple-minded story.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
26 July 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
80*

The critic praises Robin Williams' wonderful performance in the role, blending comedy and genuine emotion without cynicism. The film handles the pain of divorce with farce, giving it relevance beyond simple enjoyment.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate