Critics’ reviews

Pale Rider (1985)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 69: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Pale Rider

69
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics like Pale Rider. The praise gathers around Eastwood himself, as director and as the mysterious Preacher: a restrained, laconic style that plays the old story straight, with a dry wit underneath. Nearly every review notes the debt to Shane and does not hold it against the film. The photography of the landscape is singled out repeatedly, as is the ecological argument that updates the familiar quarrel between poor settlers and corrupt interests.

The reservations are mostly mild. Several reviews find the mythmaking a little self-conscious, and the religious symbolism is judged heavy-handed by more than one. Eye for Film calls it one of Eastwood’s weaker westerns, with jarring slapstick, though it admires Sydney Penny and the final shootout. The one dissent is The New Yorker, which sees an over-deliberate art western lacking Eastwood’s usual tension and finds the climactic gunfight a failure. Paste, writing recently, reads it as a shift in Eastwood’s thinking about violence.

Time Out
10 September 2012 · CPea
80*

The critic praises the film as a classical take on the familiar western tale of an enigmatic stranger aiding poor townsfolk against corrupt forces before riding away. Eastwood's restrained style, ghostly preacher character, and attention to landscape are singled out positively.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1984 · Variety Staff
80*

Eastwood serves up a familiar story with authority, fine craftsmanship and a sense of fun, graced by excellent visuals, confident storytelling and strong performances led by his own. It borrows from Shane but updates the conflict with ecological themes.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
18 July 1985 · Sheila Benson
70*

The critic finds Pale Rider a strong return for the Western genre, driven primarily by Eastwood's commanding, laconic performance as the mysterious Preacher. She singles out the film's timely ecological theme and its update of classic Western tropes for praise.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
28 June 1985 · Roger Ebert
70*

Eastwood's direction and screen presence make Pale Rider a classic Western of style and excitement, with a mysterious, resonant performance that dominates the film. The critic praises the visual approach and mythic elements while noting some self-conscious mythmaking.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
28 June 1985 · Vincent Canby
70*

Pale Rider is an entertaining, mystical new Western that plays straight but with dry sophistication and wit. Canby praises Eastwood's minimalism as director and actor, the supporting cast, and photography that evokes a fabled time and place.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
12 August 1985
40*

The film lifts outlines from Shane and specifics from Leone but feels like an overly self-conscious art Western with a spectral hero. The critic finds the attempt at folkloric hero lacking in the usual Eastwood tension and calls the climactic gunfight a bust.

Read the full review →
Paste
18 May 2025 · Garrett Martin
75*

The critic sees Pale Rider as Eastwood returning to mythic Western archetypes with overt Christian symbolism to examine justified violence that leaves the hero isolated. It singles out the film's nuanced evolution of Eastwood's view of violence compared to The Outlaw Josey Wales.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
8 May 2025 · Donald Munro
65*

The critic finds Pale Rider to be one of Eastwood's weaker Westerns, lacking a cohesive center and subtlety in its religious themes, with jarring slapstick elements. However, it is enjoyable overall, with strong acting performances, particularly from Sydney Penny, and striking cinematography in the final shootout.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate