Most critics like it, and those who like it tend to like it a great deal. The praise gathers around Jeff Bridges, whose unhurried Dude is repeatedly named as the thing holding the film together, with John Goodman’s volatile Walter and John Turturro’s brief turn as Jesus Quintana close behind. The Coens’ noir pastiche, the soundtrack and the quotable dialogue come up again and again, and several reviewers say the film improves on a second or third viewing.
The spread is wide, and it runs along a line in time. The negative and mixed notices almost all date from the 1998 release, when Variety, The New Yorker, the Los Angeles Times and The Guardian found the plot shapeless and the cleverness empty, with nothing at stake beneath the jokes. Reviews written since 2011 are uniformly warm, treating the film as a cult object whose looseness is the point rather than the problem.
E
Empire
1 May 1998 · ★★★★★ · Ian Nathan
100
The critic praises the Coen brothers' inventive, peculiar film as a perfect fusion of noir pastiche, rich characters, and visual flair, with Jeff Bridges perfectly cast as the Dude. It highlights the film's soulful take on human goodness amid the comedy and chaos.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
· Jonathan Romney
90*
The critic praises the Coens' playful, non-sequitur-filled neo-Chandlerian detective story as a heroic act of slacker cinema that defiantly stays inconsequential and gleefully pursues its own amusement.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
15 August 2011 · Michael Nordine
90*
The film genuinely improves with each viewing thanks to its near-infinite quotability and the tangled plot that rewards unraveling, centered on the Zen-like, magnetic Dude whose eccentricities and calm influence those around him. The critic highlights the supporting eccentrics, subtle humor, and how the Coens blend comedy with underlying grimness.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
18 June 2012 · GA
90*
The critic calls the film immensely inventive and entertaining, a prime example of the Coens' stylistic brilliance that is actually about something meaningful like friendship and manhood in its time and place.
Read the full review →The review calls the film magnificent and the Coens' finest, noting its accessible blend of film literacy, real characters, and fun mystery elements centered on the Dude. It singles out the technical glitter, memorable supporting turns like John Turturro's Jesus, and overall joyful unpredictability.
Read the full review →i
The i Paper
6 March 2018 · Nick Mitchell
85*
The critic celebrates the film as a cult classic that rewards repeat viewings due to its dense script and quotable dialogue. They single out the many small visual and referential details that add layers of genius.
Read the full review →R
RogerEbert.com
6 March 1998 · Roger Ebert
70*
The critic describes it as a genial, shambling comedy about a human train wreck that should come with a warning against seeking a plot. It is weirdly engaging like its hero the Dude, with praise for the peculiar characters, dialogue, and inventive style including hallucinations and a Busby Berkeley-inspired sequence.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
20 January 1998 · Duane Byrge
70*
The Coens deliver a deliriously fractured comedy about a deadbeat L.A. loafer that should appeal to select audiences and some mainstream viewers. It stands out for its screwy textures, performances (especially John Goodman), music, and overall rancid enjoyment.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
6 March 1998 · NYT Critic’s Pick · Janet Maslin
70*
The critic portrays the film as a funny, cool-headed comedy where the Dude maintains his enviable composure amid nonstop Coen brothers chaos. It singles out the eclectic soundtrack and the gleefully demented appearance of John Turturro’s Jesus Quintana for praise.
Read the full review →V
Variety
19 January 1998 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
50*
The critic notes it is spiked with wonderfully funny sequences and original notions but adds up to less than the sum of its parts because the film is about nothing other than its own cleverness. It praises the cast, technical work, and soundtrack while calling the overall reception likely mixed.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
16 March 1998 · Daphne Merkin
40*
The critic finds the Coens reverted to cynical disengagement after Fargo, resulting in a smart but sterile exercise drenched in knowingness with nothing at stake. It praises the cast performances and camera work but faults the lack of real emotional connection or darkness.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
6 March 1998 · Kenneth Turan
30*
The Coen brothers' film has plenty of their signature lunacy in its eccentric characters and riffs, but the sum is less than the total of its parts due to a disjointed and incoherent plot. The critic singles out strong performances, especially John Goodman's volatile Walter, for praise amid the chaos.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
24 April 1998
30*
The critic laughs a great deal at the Coens' loose, meandering follow-up to Fargo but finds it ultimately unsatisfactory and structureless, a bag of ideas that spills out at random and will win no prizes. The bowling-alley scenes and supporting turns from Goodman and Turturro are singled out as highlights amid the fantasy sequences and narrative incoherence.
Read the full review →The critic calls it a beloved cult classic that has outlived its initial mixed reception, hailing it as a hallucinatory, funny take on noir with an optimistic streak rare for the Coens. They single out Jeff Bridges' laconic, brilliant performance as the stoner protagonist who anchors the film's puzzle-box storytelling and enduring appeal.
Read the full review →/
/Film
6 March 2018 · Joshua Meyer
90*
Praises the film as the ultimate hang-out movie with endearing, memorable characters like the Dude and Walter. Highlights its quotable dialogue, cultural phenomenon status including Lebowski Fest and Dudeism, and enduring rewatchability.
Read the full review →C
Collider
6 March 2018 · Matt Goldberg
85*
Calls it a bona fide cult hit that is instantly quotable and hilarious, a strange and absurd follow-up to Fargo that showcases the Coens' identity. Notes its genius in portraying a lazy man solving a case through mishaps and its lasting memorability.
Read the full review →R
The Ringer
20 September 2018 · Adam Nayman
85*
The critic describes the film as a sly, hilarious homage to noir and detective novels that has aged perfectly, with surprising depths beneath its ambling surface. They single out Jeff Bridges' transparent, guileless performance as The Dude for its remarkable weariness and ability to convey a character's passive absorption of the world around him.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
19 February 2013 · ★★★★ · Tony Sokol
80
The critic praises the film's creation of a unique 'Lebowskiverse' with memorable characters and the Dude's Zen-like approach to chaos, highlighting Jeff Bridges' performance and the Coens' style. He notes its enduring appeal despite initial mixed reviews.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate