Critics’ reviews

The Last of the Mohicans (1992)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 75: 11 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Last of the Mohicans

75
Positive
11
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics like The Last of the Mohicans a good deal, and they like it for the same things. Daniel Day-Lewis’s Hawkeye is praised in nearly every review as the ideal fit for the part. The battle scenes, the ambush in particular, are singled out as brutal and well staged, and the landscape photography, credited to Dante Spinotti, is admired throughout. Several reviews describe the film as old-fashioned storytelling on a grand scale with a passionate romance at its centre, and count that as a virtue.

The reservations are mostly about history and feeling. Radio Times finds some of the dialogue too contemporary; the Los Angeles Times thinks the excitement comes at the cost of emotional grounding; the New Yorker finds it solemn and silly while still enjoying it. Most agree it favours thrills over accuracy. The spread is narrow, with only one mixed notice: Collider admits the craft but says the film never came alive.

The Telegraph
6 December 2013 · Marc Lee
90*

The review hails Michael Mann's 1992 film as a masterful opus set in the American frontier, with Daniel Day-Lewis delivering a career-defining performance as Hawkeye. It singles out the visually and sonically dynamic action sequences alongside the film's exploration of emotional landscapes for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
85*

The critic calls the film a stirring, wonderful epic full of old-fashioned storytelling splendour, grand heroism, thunderous action and an authentic central love story. They single out the meticulous historical detail, authentic performances (especially Day-Lewis as Hawkeye) and the director's committed vision.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

The critic praises the exciting mix of high adventure, romance and history in a colossal, glossy package with well-staged action sequences and grandiose scale, while noting some dialogue feels too contemporary.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
20 January 2015 · Jesse Hassenger
80*

The critic finds Mann’s film a rollicking and romantic historical epic that stands out for its lush visuals and passionate central romance. Day-Lewis’s commanding performance and the film’s visceral battle scenes are singled out for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
80*

The critic views the film as an epic romantic adventure rather than a strictly historical account, praising Mann's rousing action, lyrical interludes, and stylish imagery as creating superior mainstream entertainment.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
25 September 1992 · Kenneth Turan
70*

Turan finds the film undeniably exciting and adrenalized but notes its impact comes at the expense of gentler virtues and sufficient emotional grounding. He praises the spectacular natural vistas and battle scenes.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
25 September 1992 · Roger Ebert
70*

Ebert finds the film an entertaining matinee fantasy and worthy successor to the 1936 version, praising Daniel Day-Lewis as the ideal Hawkeye. He notes it prioritizes excitement over full authenticity.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
30 July 2006 · 3 · Matt Zoller Seitz
70*

The review presents the film as a primal epic of survival and reproduction that transforms Cooper’s novel into a passionate story of bloodlines and desire. The director’s sustained visual and thematic comparison of land and women is highlighted as its central achievement.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
28 September 1992 · Terrence Rafferty
70*

Rafferty calls the film awfully, solemnly silly yet enjoyable and stirring, crediting Mann's skill at myth-making and visual style. He singles out the rock-star hair and landscape for their contemporary appeal.

Read the full review →
Variety
27 August 1992 · festival review · Lisa Nesselson
70*

Nesselson notes the film benefits from rich source material and good performances, with well-staged brutal battle sequences and fluid pacing. She highlights the casting of Russell Means and Patrice Chereau.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
6 July 2010 · Nick Da Costa
85*

The critic calls the film a swashbuckling masterpiece driven by a barnstorming central performance from Daniel Day-Lewis. Mann is praised for balancing action and mood while delivering robust set pieces like the ambush scene and a stirring score.

Read the full review →
Collider
28 November 2010 · Andre Dellamorte
50*

The critic describes the film as a well-put-together, respectful adaptation of the source material in a classic Hollywood style, with gorgeous visuals from Dante Spinotti and a strong leading performance by Daniel Day-Lewis. However, it never came alive for him personally despite the practical accomplishments and pre-CGI craftsmanship.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate