Critics’ reviews

The Lion King (1994)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 71: 11 positive, 0 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of The Lion King

71
Positive
11
Mixed
0
Negative
3

Most critics admire the film, and the praise gathers around the same things. The hand-drawn animation comes first: the wildebeest stampede and the opening sequence are named repeatedly as the moments that justify the scale. The voice cast is rated highly, Jeremy Irons’s Scar above all, and the Elton John and Tim Rice songs are credited with driving the story. Several reviewers note how seriously the film treats loss and responsibility for a children’s picture, and count that a strength.

The spread is wide: there is no middle ground, only admirers and a small group who dislike it outright. The New Yorker finds the father’s death manipulative and the harmonious view of nature unconvincing; The Independent reads it as a reactionary cheer for the status quo; Sight and Sound finds it saccharine and portentous beside earlier Disney. Even supporters concede a predictable, product-like feel and some thematic obviousness, and Time Out is unmoved by the soundtrack. Timon is the one thing nearly everyone enjoys.

RogerEbert.com
24 June 1994 · Roger Ebert
90*

The film is a superbly drawn animated feature that is surprisingly solemn, dealing with real issues like loss and responsibility in a way that prepares children for life's lessons. It balances fantasy with jungle realities while delivering strong performances, especially the villain Scar, and memorable sequences.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
20 December 2002
90*

The critic praises this 1994 Disney classic about a noble lion cub cheated of his kingdom, now gloriously presented on the giant Imax canvas as a cracking Christmas treat. The animation is simple and bold, the songs drive the story with terrific fervour, and there are superb moments of family treachery and poignancy.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
27 June 2016 · Duane Byrge
90*

The critic calls the film a magnificent animated feature and certain blockbuster that will appeal across all age groups with its wise storyline, heart, humor and energy. Directors Roger Allers and Rob Minkoff are praised for crafting a multidimensional film whose crowning glories are the animators' majestic work.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2013 · William Thomas
80*

The critic praises the film's animation for its spectacle and dramatic impact, especially the wildebeest stampede, and highlights the strong voice performances and Elton John/Tim Rice soundtrack.

Read the full review →
Time Out
20 March 2012 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

The re-release confirms the film's enduring appeal through its sharp script, satisfying story and peerless vocal performances, despite a weak pseudo-world-music soundtrack. Few 3D enhancements alter the experience for those who saw it originally.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
12 September 2011 · ★★★ · Rob Humanick
75

Spectacle often dominates meaning to reductive effect, with thematic obviousness and cultural insensitivity, yet the film remains inventive and beautiful with breathtaking scenery and rapturous imagery. It works best when closest to its Shakespearean and biblical inspirations but opts for distraction over genuine wisdom or pathos.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
15 June 1994 · Janet Maslin
70*

The Lion King is visually enchanting and contrived with spirited prettiness that no child will resist, placing it in the arc of neo-Disney classics. It has the feeling of a clever, predictable product that departs from the spontaneity of predecessors but succeeds as a spirited animal-loving entertainment.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 October 1994
30*

The critic finds the film saccharine and pompously aspirational in its Shakespearean allegory and original story, with flashy computer effects undermining the usual Disney charm. Fun elements like Timon and Scar's voice work are overshadowed by portentousness, making it inferior to earlier Disney classics like The Jungle Book.

Read the full review →
The Independent
6 October 1994
30*

The critic finds the film a reactionary cheer for the status quo that stigmatizes the underclass while offering an ecological gloss. Its visuals are stunning but the storytelling amounts to fast-food reactionary drivel.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
13 June 1994 · Terrence Rafferty
30*

The film shamelessly manipulates children's emotions through the father's death and guilt, while presenting a bizarre, unconvincing vision of nature as a harmonious ecosystem where prey happily serve predators. The critic singles out the comic relief, particularly Nathan Lane's Timon, for providing the few moments of genuine joy amid the tonal whiplash.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
5 October 2011 · Mayer Nissim
90*

The 1994 film remains every bit as good as remembered, succeeding through its epic yet simple storytelling, strong vocal performances (especially Jeremy Irons as Scar), memorable Elton John/Tim Rice songs, and enduring hand-drawn animation that avoids looking dated.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
19 July 2019 · Jake Kring-Schreifels
90*

The piece celebrates the 1994 film as a landmark Disney achievement created by an underdog team of mostly inexperienced animators. It singles out the innovative hand-drawn animation techniques and epic scope, particularly the Circle of Life opening sequence, for making the story transportive and emotionally resonant.

Read the full review →
Collider
24 October 2011 · Andre Dellamorte
80*

The critic calls the 1994 film the best of Disney's late-80s/90s run and a crowning achievement that reimagines classic stories in a fresh way. They single out its blend of beauty, pain, Shakespearean influences, and warm humor as particularly effective for children while noting a minor complaint about an overt Nazi comparison in Scar's rule.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
29 August 2011 · festival review · Amber Wilkinson
80*

The critic finds the 3D re-release of the 1994 animated classic a worthwhile update that enhances the viewing experience without losing any of the film's essential emotional and comedic elements. She singles out the immersive depth added to the hand-drawn animation, particularly from the opening frames, as the standout feature that makes viewers appreciate the visuals anew.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate