Most critics like The Others, and the reviews agree on why. It is a ghost story that works by suggestion rather than gore, and nearly every notice praises Alejandro Amenábar for his patience and control in building dread from small domestic disturbances in a fog-bound house. Nicole Kidman’s brittle, highly strung mother is singled out everywhere as the film’s anchor, with several reviews also crediting the children and the sound design and photography.
The reservations are mild and cluster around how old-fashioned the film is. Total Film finds the pace sedate, and the Evening Standard, while admiring the control, thinks it a conventional exercise that copies the old dark house picture rather than pushing it somewhere new. Radio Times is cool too, calling it tasteful and old-fashioned. The spread is narrow: no critic dislikes it, the strongest notices call it one of the finer ghost stories of its kind, and the cooler ones concede the atmosphere while wishing for more.
E
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
90*
The film delivers some of the creepiest, most atmospheric chills in years through unseen forces and subtle scares rather than graphic horror. Kidman's performance as the repressed mother is superbly cast and central to the haunting effect.
Read the full review →I
IndieWire
30 October 2023 · David Ehrlich
90*
The critic praises Alejandro Amenábar's 2001 film as one of cinema's finest ghost stories that endures due to its direct confrontation with the genre's core secrets. They highlight how it confronts denial and loss in a classical, elegant haunted-house tale centered on Nicole Kidman's performance.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
9 August 2001 · festival review
90*
The review hails the film as a sumptuously crafted, suspenseful supernatural thriller with moody visuals and strong performances, especially Kidman's. It notes the art-house qualities and effective building of tension without effects or violence.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
12 August 2001 · A.O. Scott
90*
The critic describes the film as a genuine, integrity-filled psychological thriller that terrifies through what has happened rather than what happens, praising its conjuring of primal anxieties like fear of the dark and the dead over typical teenage horror fare.
Read the full review →The review calls the film a confident, subtle and controlled English-language debut that relies on suggestion and atmosphere rather than gore. It singles out the ingenious plotting, Kidman's pitch-perfect performance and its status as one of the best studio releases of the year.
Read the full review →V
Variety
7 August 2001 · festival review · Dennis Harvey
90*
The critic praises the film as a delicious old-fashioned goose-pimpler and luxuriously tailored star vehicle for Kidman, highlighting masterful control, memorable creepy set pieces, and a terrific cast led by her fascinating performance.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
· Nick James
80*
The critic praises Amenábar's controlled, atmospheric haunted-house chiller for its restraint, narrative sleights and technical craft. Kidman's feverish lead performance and the ensemble are singled out as highlights alongside the sound design and cinematography.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
10 August 2001
70*
The critic calls the film elegantly and deliberately made, reeking of mood and creepiness, with a genteel menace that anchors in Kidman's intense, vulnerable performance dominating an atmospheric traditional ghost story.
Read the full review →R
RogerEbert.com
10 August 2001 · Roger Ebert
70*
The critic finds the film a quiet, brooding haunted house mystery that builds dread slowly through atmosphere rather than shocks, praising the director's patience and Kidman's convincing performance as a normal woman in a disturbing situation.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
26 July 2001 · Ed Gonzalez
70*
Amenábar plants post-war solitude and dying religiosity before a backdrop of ghoulish shadows and claustrophobic mists in a dollhouse thriller that dares to challenge The Sixth Sense. The film evokes a hierarchically-informed spirit world and is also pretty scary.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
10 August 2001 · Scott Tobias
70*
The film is a simple, spare, and exhilaratingly old-fashioned haunted-house movie that builds tension through mundane disturbances. It harks back to classically constructed horror films that leave their scariest effects to the viewer's imagination.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
4 November 2001 · Philip French
70*
The critic praises the film for renewing the ghost story tradition with quiet authority, drawing on influences like The Turn of the Screw and The Haunting. Nicole Kidman's edgy, concerned performance as the neurotic mother anchors the atmospheric, claustrophobic tale set in a fog-bound Jersey mansion.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
2 November 2001
70*
An old-fashioned scary movie with ingenious touches that refreshes the ghost story genre through suspense, scares and surprises despite a sedate pace. Kidman's brittle performance and the children's unsettling presence heighten the clammy chills.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
60*
The film is a classy, elegant and conventional formal exercise in the old dark house spook movie with impeccable control and sustained atmosphere. It works on its own terms but is disappointing for not pushing the genre further, feeling like a simulacrum rather than a great original.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
2 November 2001 · ★★★
60
The critic describes it as a tastefully literate, old-fashioned gothic chiller that relies on mood and atmosphere. Kidman's powerful performance as the highly strung mother is highlighted alongside the sophisticated approach to suspense.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
1 November 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
80*
The critic praises the film's creation of an atmosphere of unease through suggestion rather than overt scares. They single out the flawless performances, particularly from the young actors and Nicole Kidman as the complex lead.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate