Critics’ reviews

The Purple Rose of Cairo (1985)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 78: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Purple Rose of Cairo

78
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics like this one, and several place it among Woody Allen’s best. The praise gathers around Mia Farrow, whose Depression-era waitress is called joyful, glowing and impeccable in turn, and around Allen’s script, which most find witty and unusually warm for him. The premise of a film character stepping off the screen is taken as more than a gag: reviewers credit it with saying something about why people go to the pictures, and with doing so without cynicism.

The spread is narrow at the top and then falls away. Empire finds it fond but slight. Variety is the one outright dissent, arguing that the treatment is too frivolous for a serious theme, that the ending lacks dramatic weight and that the characters around Farrow stay thin. Nobody disputes Farrow herself; even the harshest notice calls her excellent.

RogerEbert.com
1 March 1985 · Roger Ebert
90*

The film is audacious and witty, using the premise to explore reality versus fantasy in a clever way. Ebert praises the intelligent wit, charm of the leads, and how Allen makes viewers laugh and think deeply about why people go to the movies.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
27 January 2015
90*

The review praises the film as one of Woody Allen’s most charming and uncynical works from his mature period, highlighting its simple whimsy and Mia Farrow’s joyful performance as a Depression-era waitress who finds escape in the movies.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
1 March 1985 · Vincent Canby
90*

The film is pure enchantment, a sweet, lyrically funny and multilayered work that ranks among Allen's best. Canby highlights the logical extension of fantasy into reality and the glowing performance by Mia Farrow.

Read the full review →
Time Out
16 August 2012 · GA
90*

The critic praises Woody Allen's deft script for exploring the bizarre relationship between a downtrodden housewife and a film character who steps off the screen, along with the reactions of the other characters left behind. Farrow and Daniels are commended for their work with fantastic emotions, and Allen's direction is noted for its care, wit and warmth that make the film genuinely moving.

Read the full review →
Empire
14 June 2006 · David Parkinson
75*

The critic sees the film as a fond if slight bittersweet love letter to movie fans and the escapism of the Depression era. Mia Farrow is singled out as impeccable in portraying a crushed spirit reliant on fantasy.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
18 March 1985 · Pauline Kael
70*

Kael reviews the film as part of her Current Cinema column alongside another title. She examines Allen's playful take on characters stepping out of a movie screen and its implications for fantasy and reality.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1984 · ** · Variety Staff
30*

The tale offers a light, almost frivolous treatment of a serious theme about life not matching Hollywood fantasies, resulting in a tragedy that lacks sufficient dramatic weight. Farrow is excellent, but the characters remain thin.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
21 January 2015 · David Crow
90*

The critic calls the film one of Woody Allen's very best and a uniquely satisfying departure from his usual style. He singles out its brilliant use of magical realism to explore the line between fiction and reality, especially the contrast with the Great Depression setting and the lead performance by Mia Farrow.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate