Critics’ reviews

Touching the Void (2003)

16 reviews from 16 publications. Critics’ score 80: 15 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Touching the Void

80
Positive
15
Mixed
0
Negative
1

The reviews are almost unanimous. Fifteen of sixteen critics are positive, and the praise clusters on the same thing: Kevin Macdonald’s mix of interviews with the real climbers and reconstructions shot on location, which most critics find makes an already known story tense and physically convincing. Several single out the climbing sequences, the camerawork on the mountain and the sound design, and note that the plain, unadorned telling makes the ordeal harder to watch rather than easier.

The reservations are mild and scattered. A few critics find the opening slow, and some feel the film shows little interest in what happened after the climb, preferring existential questions to the public argument. The one dissent is The New York Times, which finds the film disappointing, a psychological encounter session rather than the spiritual quest it might have been, never delivering the transcendence it promises. Otherwise the spread is narrow, from warm to admiring, with the American press a little cooler than the British.

RogerEbert.com
6 February 2004 · Roger Ebert
95*

The film is an unforgettable, harrowing experience that functions more like a horror movie than most actual horror films, with its account of extreme human endurance and suffering. Ebert singles out the director's brutal directness and simplicity in presenting the story without added suspense or drama.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Will Self
90*

The critic praises Kevin Macdonald's dramatised documentary for powerfully capturing the real-life mountaineering ordeal and its Greek-tragedy elements of hubris and survival. He highlights the effective mix of reconstructions and interviews that conveys the story's emotional and physical intensity beyond a standard documentary.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
6 February 2004 · Kenneth Turan
90*

The quasi-documentary succeeds in making the impossible seem real through a nervy hybrid approach using both actors and the real climbers. Director Kevin Macdonald's veteran documentary skills help recreate the legendary Andes climb in a way that feels authentic and compelling.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
12 September 2003 · festival review
90*

An extraordinary survival story becomes an exceptional documentary that is as dramatic as fiction but with greater emotional charge. Macdonald focuses tightly on the mountain events with authentic, nailbiting reconstructions filmed on location that convey vivid desperation and claustrophobia.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
14 December 2003 · Philip French
90*

The critic praises the film's understated approach to the mountaineering survival story, highlighting its physicality and beauty in depicting the climbers' ordeal. It singles out the combination of reconstruction and interviews for creating a visceral, existential experience.

Read the full review →
The Times
11 December 2003
90*

The critic calls the film an utterly gripping piece of documentary filmmaking that ranks among the most harrowing reconstructions of survival ever made. They single out the mix of real interviews and dramatic reconstructions as a stunning creative achievement that captures the climbers' ordeal with intense power.

Read the full review →
Variety
4 September 2003 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
90*

Oscar-winning documentarian Kevin Macdonald adroitly blends first-person accounts with tense, you-are-there reenactments of the 1985 Andes ascent. The potent result captures the awesome and harrowing aspects of physical ambition and survival through strong camerawork, editing, and music.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Richard Falcon
85*

Macdonald's gripping documentary recreates the climbers' extraordinary survival tale with dramatic reconstructions and interviews, proving as powerful as his earlier work. The film excels through its focused, clutter-free style and authentic spectacle that captures the immediacy of the near-incredible story.

Read the full review →
Empire
· Ed Halliwell
80*

The docudrama blends survivor interviews with reconstructions to explore ethics, psychology and human endurance on the mountain. It builds from a slow start into a gripping account of physical and mental disintegration.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
8 January 2004 · Ed Gonzalez
70*

Macdonald intercuts interviews with impressive simulations that preserve documentary illusion, and his location photography of the mountain is outstanding. The director seems uninterested in the public fallout of the events, focusing instead on existentialism.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
20 January 2004 · Scott Tobias
70*

Macdonald's documentary skillfully recreates the climbers' near-constant brush with death through ingenuity and luck. The film's appeal lies in its fundamental grip as one of those stories that catches the breath, no matter how often told.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
12 January 2004 · Anthony Lane
70*

The film grippingly recounts the climbers' harrowing ordeal with impressive on-location camerawork and suspense despite the known outcome. It explores survival, moral choices, and the void in a sober, matter-of-fact style that contrasts with the extremity of the events.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · WH
70*

Macdonald's absorbing adaptation of the bestseller recounts the desperate Andean climb and survival, fascinating climbing enthusiasts while offering broader meditations on human endeavour and facing death. Visually and aurally striking, it resembles a nature documentary at times with the mountain as antagonist.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
23 January 2004 · Dave Kehr
30*

The critic calls the semidocumentary disappointing for treating the climb less as a spiritual quest than a psychological encounter session. It reconstructs the 1985 Andes expedition with staged sequences but fails to deliver on notions of purification and transcendence.

Read the full review →
Collider
13 October 2024 · Rhianna Malas
90*

The critic calls it the prime example of survival documentaries and the survival genre overall. They single out the organic true-story structure, with its clear A/B plot of separation and desperate struggle, and the effective use of reenactments with strong sound design and close-ups to convey the cold, tension, and physical deterioration.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
11 December 2003 · Angus Wolfe Murray
90*

The film is a spectacular achievement that captures an incredible true story of courage and determination through a mix of talking-head interviews and dramatized reconstruction. The reviewer singles out the authenticity and quality of the climbing sequences as among the best and most convincing ever filmed.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate