Poppy (Anna Kendrick) and Branch (Justin Timberlake) held aloft by two small green trolls on a path
Film review

Trolls Band Together

2023 · Directed by Walt Dohrn · 1h 31m · MPA PG

In a sentenceFive brothers, five haircuts, half a plot, and glitter in the carpet for a week

Branch (Justin Timberlake), the cautious one among the trolls, has a secret: as a child he was the youngest member of a boy band called BroZone, with four older brothers he has not spoken to since it fell apart. At a wedding, his brother John Dory (Eric André) arrives with news that another brother, Floyd (Troye Sivan), has been taken by Velvet and Veneer (Amy Schumer and Andrew Rannells), a pair of pop-star siblings who cannot sing and are draining his talent instead. Only the brothers singing together can free him, so Branch and Poppy (Anna Kendrick) set out to collect Spruce (Daveed Diggs) and Clay (Kid Cudi). Walt Dohrn directs the third film in the series, which runs 91 minutes and carries a U certificate.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

The third Trolls film is 91 minutes of boy band jokes for the parents and colour for the children, made with real care in the textures and much less in the story. Small children will be happy; nobody else will remember it by Tuesday.

Walt Dohrn’s third Trolls film opens at a wedding and gets to its business inside ten minutes. Branch (Justin Timberlake), the grumpy one, turns out to have been the baby of a boy band called BroZone, with four older brothers he has not spoken to since it split. One of them, John Dory (Eric André), crashes the ceremony to announce that another, Floyd (Troye Sivan), has been kidnapped by a pair of pop-star siblings who are draining his talent to cover for their own lack of it. The cure is the brothers singing together in perfect harmony, so Branch and Poppy (Anna Kendrick) set off to collect them. That is the film, and Elizabeth Tippet’s script does not pretend it is more.

It is a pleasant 91 minutes and it is thin, and we say both plainly. The good jokes are nearly all about boy bands: the matching outfits, the choreography, the brother who is the heartthrob and the brother who is the sensitive one, the reunion nobody wants to be the first to suggest. Timberlake knows this material from the inside and plays Branch’s embarrassment about his past with a lightness the character has not had before. We laughed, properly and against our better judgement, at the brothers’ first routine together, where the film runs through every nineties boy band move in turn, the slow head turn, the hand pressed to the heart, the drop to one knee. Then it asked us to worry about Floyd in his bottle, and we found we had nothing left over for him.

Ruben Perez’s design is the film’s real asset. Trolls have always looked as if they were made from the contents of a primary school craft cupboard, felt and pipe cleaners and glitter glue, and the new places keep that up, down to a village laid out on a miniature golf course. The villains’ world is the opposite: hard, shiny plastic in the colours of a sports drink, with nothing in it you could pick up. Twice the film changes style altogether, once into flat cut-paper shapes and once into something closer to the inside of a lava lamp, and both times we sat up. They are the passages we remember.

The villains are the weak spot. Velvet and Veneer, voiced by Amy Schumer and Andrew Rannells, are a brother and sister who would rather steal a voice than learn to use their own, and the idea is a decent one for a film about manufactured pop. Rannells gets some nervous, wanting-to-be-liked comedy out of Veneer. Velvet is written loud and only loud, and Schumer has nowhere to take her. Zosia Mamet, as their assistant Crimp, has the best-timed misery in the film. Of the brothers, Daveed Diggs’s Spruce and Kid Cudi’s Clay each arrive with one trait and leave with it. Camila Cabello turns up midway as Viva, whom we will leave you to meet, and Zooey Deschanel’s Bridget has her wedding and not much after it.

Nick Fletcher cuts the whole thing as if the children might leave the cinema. Few shots last longer than a few seconds and a song arrives every few minutes, whether or not the scene needed one. Theodore Shapiro is credited with the music, and we would struggle to hum a bar of his score, because the film hands nearly every moment to a pop song instead. The new song from Timberlake’s old band is placed near the end and it is fine. The reviews so far are split almost evenly between warm and weary, and we are in the middle with them.

Against the series’ own record this is the slightest. The first film had one rescue and one real thought about where happiness comes from. The second had an argument about music that it did not finish. This one has a joke where a story should be, and the joke is aimed a good twenty years above the heads of the audience the certificate is for. We were never annoyed, exactly. We were waiting, and the film kept handing us something shiny to wait with.

Take children under eight and they will have a lovely time; the felt and the glitter and the songs are made for them with real skill. If you are older than that, the boy band gags will carry you for about half the running time, and then it is down to how much you like the colour orange. It is over quickly, which for a film this busy is a kindness.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

62
Positive
5
Mixed
3
Negative
3

The reviews split roughly down the middle, and the disagreement is about whether a thin story matters when the film around it is this busy. Most critics agree on what works: the animation, which several describe as textured with everyday childhood materials and which shifts style from sequence to sequence; the voice cast; and the soundtrack, with the new NSYNC songs mentioned approvingly even by those who dislike the rest.

The reservations cluster around the plot, which the less impressed call perfunctory and padded with musical breaks, and around a hectic pace and relentless cheeriness that leave some reviewers unable to care about the characters. The spread is wide for a family sequel: RogerEbert.com calls it the best of the three Trolls films, while Radio Times calls it the least engaging, and Collider suggests the franchise has run its course. The middle ground treats it as harmless entertainment for young children and slim pickings for anyone older.

RogerEbert.com
17 November 2023 · Nell Minow
85*

The critic calls it the best of the three Trolls films, praising its irresistible charm, sweet tone without excess sugar, terrific voice talent, music, and varied animation styles that enhance the story and sense of adventure.

Read the full review →
Variety
22 October 2023 · festival review · Peter Debruge
80*

The critic praises the film's embrace of silliness, trippy and creative animation sequences, self-deprecating humor, and fun party-like structure as a step up from the previous sequel.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
16 November 2023 · Brandon Yu
75*

The review describes it as an entertaining boy band fever dream that reunites 'N Sync, noting strong animation and clever, funny moments despite frenetic pacing and visual stimuli.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
18 October 2023
70*

The critic finds the third Trolls film loopier than before, with a plot serving mainly as an excuse for boyband gags and glittery oddness. They single out the surreal wedding scene with helium-balloon dress and roller skates as a highlight of its candyfloss-coloured weirdness.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
19 October 2023 · 3/3/2 · David Jenkins
60

The critic views the film as a standard-issue sequel that pads a thin storyline with garish animated interludes and musical breaks, making it hard to invest in the characters or plot. It serves as a bright-eyed time-passer for young children but offers slim pickings in laughs, emotion or memorable images for anyone older.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
19 October 2023 · ★★★
60

The review notes that while the plot trudges, the animation remains inventive and textured with everyday childhood materials. It positions the film as middle-of-the-road compared to more ambitious 2023 animation releases.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Trolls Band Together worth watching?
Trolls Band Together is worth watching for children under eight, who will love the felt, glitter and songs, and we scored it 58. For anyone older, the boy band jokes carry about half of the 91 minutes and the story never arrives to fill the rest. It is pleasant, thin and quickly forgotten.
How long is Trolls Band Together, and what is it rated?
Trolls Band Together runs 1h 31m and is rated PG by the MPA in the US. It is an animation and family film.
Where can I watch Trolls Band Together in the US?
Trolls Band Together is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. It leaves Amazon Prime Video on 15 September. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Trolls Band Together compare to Yellow Submarine?
Trolls Band Together and Yellow Submarine both send a pop band to rescue a colourful world, but the older film is the bolder and better of the two. Its song sequences are worth the trip on their own; the Trolls film changes style only twice and spends the rest on a boy band joke. Small children will prefer the Trolls; adults should take the Beatles.
What should I watch after Trolls Band Together?
After Trolls Band Together, try Yellow Submarine (1968, Fi1m 74): A pop band saves a colourful world in animation that changes its mind every ten minutes. Then Spice World (1997, Fi1m 62): A real group sends itself up with a plot even thinner than this one, cheerfully; and The Muppets (2011, Fi1m 80): Getting the band back together, done with felt and with something at stake.

Cast

Awards

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie, 2024

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie

If you liked this, try…

  1. Yellow Submarine (1968, Fi1m 74)A pop band saves a colourful world in animation that changes its mind every ten minutes.

  2. Spice World (1997, Fi1m 62)A real group sends itself up with a plot even thinner than this one, cheerfully.

  3. Josie and the Pussycats (2001) · not reviewed yetManufactured pop and the people who manufacture it, taken apart with more bite.

  4. The Muppets (2011, Fi1m 80)Getting the band back together, done with felt and with something at stake.

  5. Ernest & Celestine (2012, Fi1m 84)Hand-drawn French animation that looks made by hand, for children and their parents alike.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever