Critics’ reviews

Underground (1995)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 71: 6 positive, 2 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Underground

71
Positive
6
Mixed
2
Negative
2

Most critics like Underground, and the praise gathers around the same things: the scale and energy of Kusturica’s staging, the circus-like set-pieces, and the way lowbrow slapstick sits beside an allegory about Yugoslavia’s political self-deception. Several describe it as sprawling and feverish, a comedy with real pain underneath, and more than one singles out the final sequence as the point where the humour and the sorrow finally meet.

The reservations cluster around length and purpose. Even admirers concede that three hours leave the viewer worn out, and the sceptics go further. Empire finds it rambling and increasingly hard to follow after a strong opening, Time Out cannot work out what the allegory is for, and The Independent calls it wilful and short on feeling for its people. The spread is wide, from wholehearted enthusiasm to outright irritation, and the sharpest dissent comes largely from the British press.

Los Angeles Times
30 January 1998
90*

The critic finds it a sprawling, rowdy, vital film laced with outrageous absurdist dark humor and unspeakable pain, a dazzling epic allegory that sustains passion and sorrow across decades of Yugoslavian history.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
21 December 2003 · Ed Gonzalez
90*

The critic hails the film as the most important of the last 25 years and a sweltering, morally inquisitive work of political fiction that laments humanity’s propensity for self-destruction. He singles out its deliriously metaphorical blend of lowbrow slapstick, sophisticated war commentary, and magical realist elements for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 June 1997 · Janet Maslin
90*

The critic describes a wild, sprawling feverish whimsical allegory with a devastating central idea about political delusion and the fate of Yugoslavia, praising its robust tale, bursts of humor, and magnificent ending that melds tragedy with optimism.

Read the full review →
The Times
25 March 2016 · ★★★★☆ · Kate Muir
90*

The critic hails Kusturica’s film as his masterpiece, a hallucinogenic comic romp through Yugoslavia’s troubled history. She singles out its surreal, circus-like portrayal of the repetitive insanity of conflict for particular note.

Read the full review →
Variety
30 May 1995 · festival review · Deborah Young
70*

The critic calls it a three-hour steamroller circus that leaves the viewer dazed and exhausted but mightily impressed, with energy and a condemnation of communism and war making it emotionally engaging at Cannes.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Joshua Klein
60*

The critic calls the film a bizarre, often repellent anti-war parable that takes too long to state the obvious but hits scattered high notes along the way. He singles out the surreal atmosphere and Lubitsch-like black comedy subplots for praise while criticizing the shrill tone, annoying characters, and excessive length.

Read the full review →
The Independent
7 March 1996 · Adam Mars-Jones
55*

The critic finds the film no masterpiece, too wilful and ramshackle with little feeling for its people, but notes Kusturica's striking imagery and lyricism in the final sequence that evokes Tarkovsky.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
40*

The review calls the film rambling and over-ambitious, with events engaging early on but becoming inaccessible and confusing afterward, stronger on style than substance.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
40*

The critic praises Kusturica's technical virtuosity in staging hectic large-scale set-pieces but finds it hard to discern the exact purpose of this epic allegory about political deception and heroism. They suggest that behind the sensational imagery there is ultimately less substance than meets the eye.

Read the full review →
Collider
3 August 2024 · Namwene Mukabwa
90*

The critic hails Emir Kusturica's 1995 film as a genre-defying masterpiece that blends war, comedy, fantasy, and romance into a chaotic yet beautiful cinematic experience. They praise its purposeful direction, surreal humor, and ability to find beauty in chaos while challenging conventional storytelling.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate