Critics’ reviews

Arrested Development (2003)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 74: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Arrested Development

74
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics like it, and the warmth is concentrated on the original run. The reviews from its first years describe a comedy that sets out to mock the sitcom and largely gets away with it: the writing is called sharp and fast, the ensemble is picked out repeatedly, and the hand-held, documentary-style shooting is credited with giving the show its energy. The premise of a rich family stripped of its money and crammed into a model home is found to be a reliable engine, and Jeffrey Tambor is singled out more than once.

The reservations are almost all about the later seasons, so the spread is wide. The AV Club finds the fourth season bloated and hard to love, however ambitious. IndieWire thinks the fifth is worth it for the women and Gob but senses an ending. The Telegraph, the one outright dissenter, calls that season tired and smug and says the show has outstayed its welcome. Even The Guardian, broadly approving, admits it is fun rather than laugh-out-loud funny.

The Hollywood Reporter
· Barry Garron
90*

The critic calls it the smartest, funniest and most original new comedy of the season, praising its dysfunctional Bluth family and documentary-style approach.

Read the full review →
The Times
19 March 2005
85*

The review praises the razor-sharp writing, rapid-fire jokes and one of the best ensemble casts on television, calling it the best American sitcom since Seinfeld. It highlights the strong characters and politically incorrect humour delivered with gusto.

Read the full review →
Variety
29 October 2003
85*

The series reinvents the sitcom with inspired goofiness and mocks conventions within the undernourished genre. It delivers terrific energy through its verite style, hand-held cameras, and a dysfunctional rich family dealing with corporate scandal.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
28 May 2013 · B · Emily St. James
77

The fourth season is a bloated boondoggle that is occasionally hilarious and sometimes boring but masterful in places. It is staggering in ambition yet hard to approach with real affection, more like loosely intersecting short films than the original series.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
29 May 2018 · Ben Travers
70*

Season 5 is worth watching for the women and Gob even as an ending feels imminent. The best new bits come from great women and Gob amid complicated viewing due to recent events.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
30 September 2004 · Nancy Banks-Smith
70*

The critic finds the premise of the dysfunctional Bluth family living together in a model home after financial ruin engaging and lucid. The show is not laugh-out-loud funny but definitely fun, with strong performances especially from Jeffrey Tambor.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
24 May 2018 · ★★ · Ed Cumming
40

The critic finds season 5 an improvement over the disastrous fourth but still tired, smug and self-referential, with the show having outstayed its welcome. Some character dynamics and flashes of old energy are singled out positively amid the overall fatigue.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate