Critics’ reviews

8½ (1963)

16 reviews from 16 publications. Critics’ score 85: 15 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of 8½

85
Positive
15
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics agree this is one of Fellini’s best films and the definitive portrait of a director who cannot get his next picture started. The praise clusters on the dream sequences and on the way the film slides between memory, fantasy and what is happening on set, with the opening and the harem daydream named more than once. Gianni Di Venanzo’s black-and-white photography and Nino Rota’s score are singled out repeatedly, as is Marcello Mastroianni’s performance as the blocked director.

The spread is narrow, with fifteen positive reviews and a single mixed one. The reservations are mostly historical. The New York Times, reviewing in 1963, finds the ending a letdown, and The Hollywood Reporter of the same year doubts its appeal beyond art houses. The Independent, in 1993, calls it dated but fitfully arresting. Even admirers concede it is self-indulgent and divisive, though most count that as part of its point.

Little White Lies
1 May 2015 · 5/5/5 · Ian Mantgani
100

The critic hails the film as an iconic masterpiece and a re-release worth seeing on the big screen. They praise its fluid shifts between reality, dream, memory and fantasy, its sincerity beneath virtuosic set pieces, and its enduring emotional resonance as a map of life’s stresses and creative catharsis.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

Parkinson praises the film as a mesmerising, complex study of creative and personal crisis. He singles out its mix of daydreams, memories, nightmares and confrontations for capturing Fellini’s struggle to sustain his reputation.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
30 April 2015 · Danny Leigh
90*

The critic describes the digitally restored re-release as a glorious portrait of a grand director folding in on himself. It ranks among the greatest movies about movies.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
23 April 2010 · Kenneth Turan
90*

Turan describes 8 1/2 as a timeless classic of personal cinema about self-portraiture and the creative process. He singles out its ability to enthrall through imagination and instinct.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
7 May 1993 · Roger Ebert
90*

Ebert calls 8 1/2 a great film and the definitive work about director's block. He singles out its autobiographical elements and the famous harem daydream sequence for praise.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
10 December 2024 · Joseph Jon Lanthier
90*

The critic views 8½ as a pivotal shift in Fellini’s work from neorealism to oneiric, personal cinema about creative and masculine crisis, praising its self-deprecating comedy, Freudian elements, and focus on the women in the protagonist’s life. The review highlights the film’s embrace of cinema as an expression of the panicked id and its enduring influence.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
30 April 2015 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic praises Fellini’s hallucinatory masterpiece as a compelling meditation on films as dreams and memories that exerts an irresistible pull. The opening dream sequence stands out as one of the most incredible things in cinema.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
29 June 1963 · Brendan Gill
90*

Gill praises the film as marvellous and a comedy about life's absurdities and desirability. He highlights Fellini's inventive cinematic tricks, performances, photography, and witty script.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1962 · Variety Staff
90*

The review calls 8 1/2 an exciting, stimulating monumental creation that tops La Dolce Vita. It praises the intensely personal storytelling and Fellini's ability to confess innermost thoughts entertainingly.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2012 · Steve Goldman
85*

The critic praises the film as one of Fellini's masterpieces and a powerful personal statement that continues to beguile despite being divisive. It singles out the sprawling portrait of the artist and the creative process in crisis.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
11 July 1963 · James Powers
70*

The film is a grim fable of modern man and a true art picture likely limited in general appeal but strong in art houses. It features penetrating and witty moments with strong performances, especially from Marcello Mastroianni, and excellent technical credits including editing and music.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 June 1963 · Bosley Crowther
70*

Fellini has made a stimulating contemplation of a sweet guy, though it leaves an uncomfortable feeling of letdown at the end. The critic praises the director's tremendous pictorial poetry, intimations of pathos and longing, skill with the silly and grotesque, and splendid performing, along with another delicious Nino Rota score.

Read the full review →
The Times
1 May 2015 · Kate Muir
70*

The critic describes the film as a surreal self-interrogation in which Mastroianni plays a blocked director fantasising about women and his past. She highlights the lush black-and-white photography and the restoration screening at the BFI.

Read the full review →
The Independent
28 March 1993
60*

The short review describes the film as post-modernism 1963-style about a director on the verge of a nervous breakdown. It notes that it is dated but fitfully arresting.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
1 May 2015 · Aleyha Ahmed
90*

The critic praises this restored rerelease of Fellini's classic as a darkly funny, brilliantly acted masterpiece about life, art and the psyche, centered on the chaotic world of filmmaking. They highlight the film's rare cohesion through striking black-and-white cinematography and Nina Rota's score, and urge viewers to see it on the big screen.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
6 November 2013 · ★★★★ · Philip Concannon
80

The critic views 8½ as a singular, self-indulgent yet extraordinary act of creative expression that grows more stimulating with each viewing. They single out the memorable black-and-white images by cinematographer Gianni Di Venanzo and the dazzling dream sequences and scenes featuring the women from the protagonist's past.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate