Critics’ reviews

American Beauty (1999)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 80: 11 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of American Beauty

80
Positive
11
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics greet American Beauty warmly: eleven of the twelve reviews are positive, and the praise gathers in the same places. Kevin Spacey’s lead performance is singled out again and again for its wit and control. Alan Ball’s script is credited with holding sharp satire and real affection for its characters together, and Sam Mendes’s direction is judged assured for a first film. Several reviews also pick out Annette Bening and Conrad Hall’s cinematography.

The spread is narrow but not unanimous. The cooler notices find it a shade too neat: Time Out thinks it too pat to be revelatory and unconvincing as suspense, and the Guardian admits some redundancy and naivety. The one outright dissent comes from Slant Magazine, writing two years after release, which calls the portrait of suburbia cartoonish and the direction slick, while still crediting Bening. How well the film ages is the question the later reviews raise.

RogerEbert.com
24 September 1999 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

Ebert views the film as both comedy and tragedy, centering on a middle-aged man's rebellion against his unloved, unrespected life and his pursuit of fleeting freedom and beauty. He singles out Kevin Spacey's intelligent performance and the ensemble's balance of parody and realism, while noting the story's emphasis on sadness and loneliness over cruelty.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
90*

The critic calls it an exceptional, achingly funny and bitingly moving debut from Sam Mendes that explores ordinary Americans going off the rails. Kevin Spacey's richly textured lead performance is singled out for particular praise alongside the film's devotion to humanity and love.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 February 2000 · Kevin Jackson
90*

The critic finds the film a brilliantly executed satire that transcends its clichéd suburban midlife-crisis premise through nuanced performances and tonal shifts. Kevin Spacey’s lead turn and Sam Mendes’ assured direction are singled out as making it a genuine surprise and ensemble triumph.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
13 September 1999 · David Denby
90*

The film moves from sharp satirical riffs on suburban conformity to a vision of the sublime, offering redemption through appreciation of hidden beauty. It is called a rich, brilliant, and unnerving work, with praise for the direction, cinematography, and Kevin Spacey's performance.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
15 September 1999 · Janet Maslin
90*

The critic hails the film's successful balance between mordant satire and bright affection for its characters in curdled suburbia. Kevin Spacey's witty, agile performance and Sam Mendes's visual flair are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
13 September 1999 · Todd McCarthy
90*

The film is an acerbic, darkly comic critique of social conventions leading to sterile lives, called a real American original and stunning debut for writer Alan Ball and director Sam Mendes. The multilayered script, sure-handed direction, and exceptional ensemble cast are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
10 September 1999 · festival review
80*

The critic praises the film's savage wit and strong performances in this Toronto festival preview. It highlights the sharp satire and ensemble work as standout elements.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
28 January 2000
80*

The critic finds Sam Mendes's debut an exhilaratingly intelligent and formally brilliant suburban satire despite some redundancy and naivety. Spacey and Bening deliver standout performances as the central unhappy couple.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
15 September 1999 · Kenneth Turan
70*

The review describes an unsettling, unnerving dark comedy that avoids easy categorization, energized by bravura performances from Kevin Spacey and Annette Bening. Sam Mendes's provocative debut direction and Conrad Hall's cinematography are highlighted as key strengths.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TCh
70*

The review calls it a polished, acerbic social satire with countercultural leanings, praising Alan Ball’s screenplay for balancing wit and compassion and Mendes for guiding an artful path between desire and self-disgust. It notes the film is a shade too pat to be revelatory and unconvincing as suspense.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
17 August 2001 · 1 · Ed Gonzalez
30*

The critic finds the film does not age well and calls its portrait of suburban life cartoonish, while noting some strong performances especially from Annette Bening. The direction and screenplay are faulted for being overly slick and smutty.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
80*

The critic praises the script's devastating yet funny attack on middle-class American psyche, highlighting the humor, horror, and strong performances. It singles out the film's imaginative direction and broad scope covering dysfunction.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate