Batgirl (Alicia Silverstone) Batman (George Clooney) and Robin (Chris O'Donnell) standing together
Film review

Batman & Robin

1997 · Directed by Joel Schumacher · 2h 05m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceBatman has all that equipment and still cannot stop the ice jokes

Bruce Wayne (George Clooney) is Batman, and Dick Grayson (Chris O’Donnell) is Robin. The pair face Mr. Freeze (Arnold Schwarzenegger), also known as Dr. Victor Fries, and Poison Ivy (Uma Thurman), whose other identity is Dr. Pamela Isley. Alfred Pennyworth (Michael Gough) and Commissioner Gordon (Pat Hingle) are among the people around the masked heroes, alongside Barbara Wilson (Alicia Silverstone). Julie Madison (Elle Macpherson), Dr. Jason Woodrue (John Glover) and Nora Fries (Vendela Kirsebom) also feature in this action and science-fiction adventure.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Joel Schumacher’s costumed spectacle has inventive sets and an amusing Uma Thurman. But the repetitive action, wearying ice jokes and uninteresting heroes make it poor entertainment, however much there is to look at.

Joel Schumacher treats Batman & Robin as an opportunity for broad comedy and extravagant costumes, and there is nothing inherently wrong with that choice. We do not require Batman to spend every evening looking distressed. But this is a poor action film and a tiring comedy: its jokes repeat, its fights blur together, and its heroes seldom seem to matter. Most critics have little patience with it, and we agree, though the work on the sets deserves more consideration than the screenplay.

George Clooney’s Batman / Bruce Wayne is so relaxed that danger barely seems to concern him. The performance leaves us waiting for some urgency, or even curiosity, that might make him worth following through all this machinery. Chris O’Donnell gets little more from Robin / Dick Grayson, and their partnership never supplies the pleasure of two people who are interesting together. Akiva Goldsman’s screenplay gives them plenty to say without making us eager to hear it.

Uma Thurman fares better as Poison Ivy / Dr. Pamela Isley. Her mocking manner and succession of disguises make the character entertaining to watch even when the writing offers little help. We were amused by her, because she makes the costumes part of the joke rather than simply something to wear while delivering it. Arnold Schwarzenegger is less fortunate as Mr. Freeze / Dr. Victor Fries. His ice jokes arrive so regularly that we start bracing for the next one before he has finished the present one.

Barbara Ling’s production design gives the machinery and sets enough character to compete with the cast. There is pleasure in looking at constructions this brazenly excessive, and their extravagance suits the kind of entertainment the film wants to provide. Stephen Goldblatt’s cinematography serves that same appetite for conspicuous colour and display, making the surroundings more inviting than the action within them. The difficulty is emphasis: with so much demanding attention, the images rarely help us decide what actually matters in a scene.

Editors Mark Stevens and Dennis Virkler keep things moving, but the action sequences become difficult to distinguish in their effect. More hardware and more stunts provide little sense that anyone has gained or lost something worth caring about. Elliot Goldenthal’s music contributes to the bustle without making these confrontations feel much more consequential. We were bored by the repeated action and then irritated by the ice jokes, because the film kept returning to both without finding anything fresh to do with either.

At 125 minutes, there is plenty of space to establish the characters, yet the crowded screenplay makes most of them feel incidental. Alicia Silverstone’s Barbara Wilson adds another presence without making the story more involving. The middle stretch is particularly weak, with neither the comedy nor the action providing much reason to anticipate the next scene. There is willing effort among the cast, but the material leaves too many performers competing for attention rather than building scenes together.

A superhero comedy needs comic timing as much as any other comedy, and this one too often assumes that a conspicuous costume will do the work. There is no need to object to its silliness or wish it were solemn. The disappointment is how seldom its elaborate preparations produce a satisfying laugh or an exciting fight. Only a strong interest in extravagant sets would make us recommend sitting through the rest.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

35
Positive
1
Mixed
2
Negative
8

Most critics find Batman & Robin exhausting, with elaborate sets and flamboyant villains offering limited compensation for weak storytelling. Praise clusters around Uma Thurman’s Poison Ivy, whose mocking attitude and theatricality give several reviews something to enjoy even when the leads disappoint. Some critics also admire the production design, though the prevailing complaint is that hardware, effects and repetitive action leave little space for characters worth caring about.

The sharpest divide concerns the camp tone: most reviews find the relentless puns and knowing excess tiresome, while The New York Times embraces the film’s costume-party energy and singles out Thurman. Film Stories offers a more qualified defence, finding entertainment in the garish style while still judging the film bad. The spread is wide, but approval remains scarce; thin plotting, overcrowding and slack narrative momentum recur across the less enthusiastic reviews.

The New York Times
20 June 1997 · Janet Maslin
70*

Maslin embraces the film as a wild, campy costume party that suggests a Studio 54 in Gotham, praising its flashy showmanship and frenetic energy. She singles out Uma Thurman's Poison Ivy as the most showstopping character for her mocking attitude and flamboyant disguises.

Read the full review →
Variety
16 June 1997 · Todd McCarthy
50*

McCarthy notes the film loses some altitude in the franchise, with the villains (especially Thurman) as highlights but the overall production lacking dash and excitement. He singles out the bland newcomers and sag in narrative drive and humor in the middle section.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
20 June 1997 · Roger Ebert
40*

Ebert finds the film visually impressive with strong production design but criticizes its lack of authentic core, as it prioritizes elaborate special effects over meaningful characters or story. He singles out the villains' memorable images and performances while noting the meandering screenplay and over-the-top puns.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2013 · Neil Jeffries
30*

The first half-hour offers some fun set-pieces and design, but the overstuffed plot, incessant puns and wisecracks, and lack of depth soon make it exhausting; Uma Thurman stands out as Poison Ivy while the leads disappoint.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
20 June 1997
30*

The critic finds the film overloaded with hardware, stunts and excess that leaves no room for connection or inspiration, describing it as a relief when it ends. They single out the slick surface and repetitive action sequences that blur together without substance.

Read the full review →
The Independent
28 June 1997
30*

The critic lambasts the film as an overly camp, pun-filled exercise in kinky innuendo and double entendres that strays far from the source material, with a knowingness that undermines any superhero narrative.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Batman & Robin worth watching?
Batman & Robin is not worth watching for most people, and we scored it 35. Joel Schumacher's costumed spectacle has inventive sets from Barbara Ling and an amusing Uma Thurman, but the fights blur together, Mr. Freeze's ice jokes repeat until they wear us out, and George Clooney's Batman seems barely concerned by any of it. Only a strong interest in extravagant production design would justify the two hours.
How long is Batman & Robin, and what is it rated?
Batman & Robin runs 2h 05m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is an action and science fiction film.
Where can I watch Batman & Robin in the US?
Batman & Robin is streaming on HBO Max, Hulu, The Roku Channel and Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $4.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Batman & Robin compare to Batman Forever?
Batman & Robin is the weaker of Joel Schumacher's two Batman films, and Batman Forever is the one to choose if you want either. The earlier film is bright, quick and often funny for an hour before it turns merely loud; the later one is loud from the start, with repetitive action and heroes who seldom seem to matter. Both are built on neon sets and broad comedy, but only the earlier one delivers the jokes with any timing.
Do you need to have seen the other Batman films before Batman & Robin?
Batman & Robin can be watched without seeing any of the other Batman films, since it introduces Bruce Wayne, Dick Grayson and their opponents plainly enough for a newcomer. It is not a good place to start, though: it is the poorest entry we have reviewed, and a first-timer would get a misleading idea of what the series can do. Anyone curious about Joel Schumacher's approach is better served by Batman Forever.
What should I watch after Batman & Robin?
After Batman & Robin, try Flash Gordon (1980, Fi1m 70): Bright costumes, broad villains and a sense of fun that survives the dialogue. Then Batman (1966, Fi1m 73): For comic absurdity played with the discipline this version keeps forgetting; and The City of Lost Children (1995, Fi1m 78): The extravagant sets belong to a stranger, more carefully sustained adventure.
What order should I watch the Batman films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Batman, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. Batman & Robin is number 4 of the 7 Batman titles on Fi1m; before it comes Batman Forever and after it Batman Begins. The full order.

Part of · 4 of 7

Batman

7 films on Fi1m · 1989–2012 · average 70 · best The Dark Knight 85

All 7 in order

Cast

Awards

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 1998

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress, 1997

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress

If you liked this, try…

  1. Flash Gordon (1980, Fi1m 70)Bright costumes, broad villains and a sense of fun that survives the dialogue.

  2. Batman (1966, Fi1m 73)For comic absurdity played with the discipline this version keeps forgetting.

  3. The City of Lost Children (1995, Fi1m 78)The extravagant sets belong to a stranger, more carefully sustained adventure.

  4. Mystery Men (1999) · not reviewed yetAnother crowded superhero comedy, but its misfits are worth spending time with.

  5. Cutie Honey (2004) · not reviewed yetCostumed heroics with enough comic energy to make the excess feel purposeful.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever