Critics’ reviews

Ben-Hur (1959)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 71: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of Ben-Hur

71
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
4

Most critics rate Ben-Hur highly, and nearly all of them, admirers and doubters alike, agree on one thing: the chariot race. It is named in almost every review as the film’s peak, praised for its scale, its practical staging and the thousands of extras. The sea battle draws similar admiration. Beyond the set-pieces, the positive reviews credit William Wyler for keeping the human drama in view amid the spectacle, and several praise Charlton Heston’s central performance, with Stephen Boyd also noted.

The split is wide: seven reviews positive, four negative, none in between. The dissenters find the film long, preachy and slow between its action sequences. The New Yorker thinks it better suited to children and finds Heston stiff. Time Out likens it to a Sunday school lesson and points out that the chariot race was not directed by Wyler. The Guardian and Eye for Film both argue it has not aged as well as its reputation suggests.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Peter Freedman
100

Wyler's epic is hailed as a costly, Oscar-sweeping masterpiece with Charlton Heston at his heroic best; the chariot race stands out as one of cinema's most iconic sequences, built on an unprecedented scale.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
90*

Praises the film's unmatched grandeur and epic scale as a widescreen spectacle that still influences modern cinema. Singles out the impressive practical set-pieces like the chariot race alongside the strong central human drama anchored by Charlton Heston's performance.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
18 November 1959 · Jack Harrison
90*

The critic calls it an extraordinary motion picture, greater than any similar film of its time and the greatest of all spectacles, while also being a highly rewarding dramatic experience rich in human values. They single out the chariot race and sea battle for their pictorial and dramatic excitement, along with William Wyler's direction that balances spectacle with character-driven storytelling.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
19 November 1959 · Bosley Crowther
90*

The critic calls the film the most stirring and respectable of Bible-fiction pictures, praising William Wyler's direction for turning spectacle into intelligent human drama and highlighting the strong performances by Charlton Heston and Stephen Boyd along with the brilliant chariot race.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
1 January 2015
90*

The critic calls the 1959 film one of cinema's greatest blockbusters, praising its grand biblical storytelling, intelligent direction, and especially the memorable chariot race sequence with thousands of extras.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
25 November 1959 · Philip K. Scheuer
85*

The critic declares the film magnificent, inspiring, awesome and enthralling overall. The chariot race stands out as an unmatched peak in cinematic action.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
28 November 1959 · John McCarten
40*

The review finds the epic better suited to children than to adults, noting its grandiose sets, melodrama, and lengthy chariot race while criticizing Charlton Heston's stiff performance and overall appeal to tired viewers.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
18 November 2019
30*

The film won 11 Oscars and was a huge hit on release but has not endured as well as other 1959 classics. The chariot race remains spectacular, but much of the rest feels drab and lumbering.

Read the full review →
Time Out
26 September 2014 · SM
30*

The film is viewed as overly long and preachy like a Sunday school lesson, but redeemed by its standout chariot race sequence (not directed by Wyler). It also notes the sexually charged dynamics between the male leads.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
3 April 2015 · David Crow
90*

The critic hails Wyler's 1959 epic as the best Easter movie and a benchmark for the genre, praising its intellectual approach to faith and human story over cloying piety. The chariot race and Wyler's skeptical, distant treatment of Jesus are singled out for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
20 April 2026 · Donald Munro
40*

The film is not as good as its reputation suggests and drags due to overstatement, repetition, and excessive length, though the large-scale action sequences stand out. The naval battle and chariot race are highlighted for their impressive scale, seamless integration of effects, and excitement in the wide aspect ratio.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate