Critics’ reviews

Broadcast News (1987)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 78: 13 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Broadcast News

78
Positive
13
Mixed
1
Negative
0

The reviews are almost entirely warm, and the praise lands in the same two places: James L. Brooks’s screenplay and the acting. Critics credit the script with catching a Washington news bureau at full panic and with seeing early where television news is heading, towards entertainment and away from substance. Holly Hunter’s anxious producer is the performance most often singled out, with Albert Brooks’s repressed, truth-telling reporter close behind. Several critics note that the romance matters less than the characters’ devotion to their jobs, and treat that as the point.

The spread is narrow. Only The New Yorker sits in the mixed column, finding the dialogue witty but the direction episodic and closer to television than cinema. Among the admirers, the recurring complaint is a soft centre and a weak epilogue, raised by Empire, Time Out and Slant. Later reappraisals run noticeably hotter than the notices from the film’s release, which are appreciative but more measured.

The AV Club
3 June 2013 · Nick Schager
90*

The critic calls it Brooks’ funniest and most incisive portrait of navigating personal and professional lines, praising its prescient take on TV news shifting toward infotainment and the complex ethical dilemmas faced by the leads.

Read the full review →
Vulture
19 December 2017
90*

The piece hails the film as a romantic-comedy masterpiece that remains resonant, especially for its sharp writing, multilayered characters, and astute portrayal of journalism; it singles out Holly Hunter’s performance as the vital, empowering center.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
16 December 2018 · Duane Byrge
85*

The critic calls the film a wonderfully funny yet trenchantly sober look at modern romance in a high-pressure TV news bureau, crediting James L. Brooks' brilliant screenplay for blending romance and workplace satire effectively. It singles out the strong performances, especially Holly Hunter's as the anxious producer and the insightful take on workaholics navigating professional and personal tensions.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1986 · Variety Staff
85*

Enormously entertaining inside look at TV journalists' lives, praising the performances especially Holly Hunter and Albert Brooks, and Brooks' sly satirical edge.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
80*

The critic describes the film as a funny and provocative examination of the professional and emotional conflicts within a TV news team. They single out James L. Brooks's insightful writing and direction, along with the strong ensemble cast, for particular praise while noting a minor flaw in the epilogue.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
80

It's Drop the Dead Donkey stateside in this sweet-and-sour satirical comedy. A romantic triangle develops between three self-serving Washington TV journalists, with Holly Hunter provoking the sorrow and pity of lives at the mercy of their careers.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · SGr
75*

Brooks is knowing about the wisecracks, back-stabbings and political shifts of the media game, underpinning a charming love-triangle with a serious statement about television news. The script has superb set pieces and crackles with furious one-liners, though it is a little soft-centred.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
20 December 1987 · Sheila Benson
70*

Brooks' original screenplay captures the backstage world of television news at peak panic with delicious specificity and powers of observation. It offers eavesdropper pleasures on real newsroom dynamics through sharp dialogue and character revelations.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
16 December 1987 · Roger Ebert
70*

The film is as knowledgeable about TV news as any movie but also examines how people use high-pressure jobs to avoid personal introspection. It centers on three characters in a romantic triangle who are ultimately more obsessed with work than love.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
31 January 2011 · Bill Weber
70*

The review praises the film’s watchable cast, comic set pieces, and Hunter’s vulnerable yet powerhouse performance as Jane, while noting some built-in naïveté in its view of substantive journalism and a diluted epilogue.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
16 December 1987 · Vincent Canby
70*

Television news-as-entertainment is the funny, occasionally satiric subtext of this bright comedy with smashing performances by William Hurt, Albert Brooks and Holly Hunter. Brooks goes inside a network's Washington bureau to show how things work in a gentle expose.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
4 January 1988 · Pauline Kael
60*

The critic finds the film entertaining with witty dialogue but criticizes its lack of filmmaking excitement and conventional satirical approach, singling out the authentic newsroom hum and Albert Brooks' performance for praise while noting the TV-like episodic directing as a flaw.

Read the full review →
Collider
19 February 2011 · Andre Dellamorte
90*

The critic praises the film as a subtle, insightful masterwork about journalism and human desires, noting how it cuts deeper than more strident satires like Network by showing people knowingly choosing the attractive over the substantive. The performances, especially Albert Brooks as the truth-telling but repressed Altman, are singled out as note-perfect.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
18 December 2017 · Haley Mlotek
90*

The film is a masterpiece and among the best movies ever made about journalism, standing out for its exceptional performances and deeply honest writing. It offers an accurate and hilarious look at the media hellscape as it was then and remains now, while treating romance as secondary to the characters' work obsessions.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate