Tom Grunick (William Hurt) seated at the news desk with world map
Film review

Broadcast News

1987 · Directed by James L. Brooks · 2h 13m · MPA R

In a sentenceEveryone in this newsroom can ask a difficult question, provided it has nothing to do with their own love life

In a Washington television news bureau, producer Jane Craig (Holly Hunter) works alongside Tom Grunick (William Hurt) and Aaron Altman (Albert Brooks). Their working lives become entangled in a romantic triangle, with professional loyalties complicating personal attraction. The pressure to get news on air leaves little room for anyone to consider what they want away from the job. As ambition and affection pull the three colleagues in different directions, the bureau remains the centre of their lives. James L. Brooks writes and directs this comedy about romance, careers and the business of television news.

Fi1m review

James L. Brooks makes a funny, perceptive romance about people who would rather discuss work than themselves. It gets too forgiving of their faults, but Holly Hunter, William Hurt and Albert Brooks make them worth caring about.

Broadcast News is a funny, observant romantic comedy whose people have made work their main excuse for neglecting themselves. James L. Brooks writes and directs with enough affection to make their company pleasurable, even when their behaviour is not. We recommend it warmly, with a reservation about the gentle treatment these colleagues sometimes receive. The Washington television news bureau matters because a professional disagreement can become personal before anybody has admitted there is a personal problem.

Holly Hunter’s Jane Craig is the reason that mixture works. Her anxiety as a producer gives the workplace scenes urgency, but Hunter also makes it tiring to be around someone for whom the job is always so important. She does not ask us to mistake that intensity for an uncomplicated virtue. She makes dedication look exhausting, particularly when Jane cannot seem to put any distance between herself and the work.

William Hurt’s Tom Grunick and Albert Brooks’s Aaron Altman give her two different kinds of company, and neither performance settles for filling a corner of the triangle. Hurt makes it possible to like Tom without having to agree with him. Albert Brooks gives Aaron’s wit an edge that makes him funny without making him automatically right. We laughed at the newsroom wisecracks, then felt uncomfortable about how readily we had enjoyed their malice. The script allows a clever line to hurt somebody, rather than treating every joke as harmless.

Michael Ballhaus’s cinematography keeps our interest in the faces, which is sensible in a film where so much depends on how a remark is received. Charles Rosen’s production design makes the bureau convincing as the centre of these people’s lives. Neither contribution makes the workplace feel incidental to the romance. The professional setting gives the actors reasons to be near each other, judge each other and avoid saying what is bothering them.

Richard Marks’s editing is especially effective at keeping the newsroom exchanges brisk without losing their personal sting. The pace is less assured when the film gives its people more time to consider their feelings, and at 133 minutes there is room for a firmer cut. Bill Conti’s score is an amiable companion to the romance, although its encouragement towards tenderness can feel unnecessary. Brooks has already given his actors enough to make us care; the music need not insist.

Our main reservation is that Brooks forgives too much. He understands the back-stabbing and the temptation to treat television news as entertainment, then lets the romance take some of the discomfort away. Still, compared with a romantic comedy in which work is merely an obstacle to finding the right person, this has a welcome interest in why people enjoy their jobs. Attraction has to compete with the pleasure of being useful, being admired and being right.

There is no requirement to like all three people equally, and the film is better company if we resist picking a favourite too quickly. Hunter, Hurt and Albert Brooks keep changing how much sympathy each deserves. Their self-absorption can be funny and painful within the same exchange. Watch it with someone prepared to disagree about all three of them.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

78
Positive
13
Mixed
1
Negative
0

The reviews are almost entirely warm, and the praise lands in the same two places: James L. Brooks’s screenplay and the acting. Critics credit the script with catching a Washington news bureau at full panic and with seeing early where television news is heading, towards entertainment and away from substance. Holly Hunter’s anxious producer is the performance most often singled out, with Albert Brooks’s repressed, truth-telling reporter close behind. Several critics note that the romance matters less than the characters’ devotion to their jobs, and treat that as the point.

The spread is narrow. Only The New Yorker sits in the mixed column, finding the dialogue witty but the direction episodic and closer to television than cinema. Among the admirers, the recurring complaint is a soft centre and a weak epilogue, raised by Empire, Time Out and Slant. Later reappraisals run noticeably hotter than the notices from the film’s release, which are appreciative but more measured.

The AV Club
3 June 2013 · Nick Schager
90*

The critic calls it Brooks’ funniest and most incisive portrait of navigating personal and professional lines, praising its prescient take on TV news shifting toward infotainment and the complex ethical dilemmas faced by the leads.

Read the full review →
Vulture
19 December 2017
90*

The piece hails the film as a romantic-comedy masterpiece that remains resonant, especially for its sharp writing, multilayered characters, and astute portrayal of journalism; it singles out Holly Hunter’s performance as the vital, empowering center.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
16 December 2018 · Duane Byrge
85*

The critic calls the film a wonderfully funny yet trenchantly sober look at modern romance in a high-pressure TV news bureau, crediting James L. Brooks' brilliant screenplay for blending romance and workplace satire effectively. It singles out the strong performances, especially Holly Hunter's as the anxious producer and the insightful take on workaholics navigating professional and personal tensions.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1986 · Variety Staff
85*

Enormously entertaining inside look at TV journalists' lives, praising the performances especially Holly Hunter and Albert Brooks, and Brooks' sly satirical edge.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
80*

The critic describes the film as a funny and provocative examination of the professional and emotional conflicts within a TV news team. They single out James L. Brooks's insightful writing and direction, along with the strong ensemble cast, for particular praise while noting a minor flaw in the epilogue.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
80

It's Drop the Dead Donkey stateside in this sweet-and-sour satirical comedy. A romantic triangle develops between three self-serving Washington TV journalists, with Holly Hunter provoking the sorrow and pity of lives at the mercy of their careers.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Broadcast News worth watching?
Broadcast News is worth watching for anyone who likes a romantic comedy in which the work matters as much as the romance, and we scored it 84. Holly Hunter, William Hurt and Albert Brooks make three self-absorbed colleagues worth caring about, though James L. Brooks forgives their faults more readily than we would. At 133 minutes it could lose a little.
How long is Broadcast News, and what is it rated?
Broadcast News runs 2h 13m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a comedy and romance film.
Where can I watch Broadcast News in the US?
Broadcast News is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Broadcast News, and is it suitable for children?
Broadcast News is not violent or frightening; it carries a UK 15 certificate for adult language and the behaviour of its characters rather than for anything alarming. The comedy trades in newsroom wisecracks with real malice behind them, and the romance is between grown-ups with grown-up problems. Children would find little to hold them, and the certificate rules out younger ones in any case.
How does Broadcast News compare to His Girl Friday?
Broadcast News is the warmer and slower of the two, while His Girl Friday is the sharper and faster. Howard Hawks treats newspaper work as a comedy of speed and lets nobody be decent; James L. Brooks gives his television journalists more time to consider their feelings and rather more sympathy than they earn. Choose the earlier film for precision, the later one for people you might want to spend an evening with.
What should I watch after Broadcast News?
After Broadcast News, try His Girl Friday (1940, Fi1m 90): For newsroom speed and a romance conducted as a professional dispute. Then The Apartment (1960, Fi1m 91): For office ambition, compromised affection and jokes that do not excuse the damage; and Toni Erdmann (2016, Fi1m 86): For another woman whose professional discipline offers little protection from personal embarrassment.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1988

Nominated
Best Actor
Nominated
Best Actress
Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Supporting Actor

If you liked this, try…

  1. His Girl Friday (1940, Fi1m 90)For newsroom speed and a romance conducted as a professional dispute.

  2. The Apartment (1960, Fi1m 91)For office ambition, compromised affection and jokes that do not excuse the damage.

  3. The Taste of Others (2000) · not reviewed yetFor adults mistaking good manners and social confidence for understanding one another.

  4. The Hour (2011) · not reviewed yetFor television news made by people whose private loyalties complicate the work.

  5. Toni Erdmann (2016, Fi1m 86)For another woman whose professional discipline offers little protection from personal embarrassment.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever