Theo Faron (Clive Owen) and Kee (Clare-Hope Ashitey) shield the baby from armed soldiers in a ruined corridor
Film review

Children of Men

2006 · Directed by Alfonso Cuarón · 1h 49m · MPA R

In a sentenceThe last hope of the human race is carried through a war zone by a man who stopped caring years ago

London, 2027. No child has been born anywhere on Earth for eighteen years, and the country has closed its borders and put refugees in cages on the pavements. Theo Faron (Clive Owen), a civil servant who drinks, is grabbed off the street by the Fishes, a rebel group led by his former wife Julian (Julianne Moore). She wants him to use a cousin in government (Danny Huston) to get transit papers for a young refugee, Kee (Clare-Hope Ashitey), and to travel with her to the coast. Theo agrees for money and goes to his friend Jasper (Michael Caine), an old cartoonist living in the woods, to decide whether he means it. On the road, with Luke (Chiwetel Ejiofor) and the midwife Miriam (Pam Ferris), he finds out why Kee matters.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Alfonso Cuarón’s near-future thriller is a dystopia that looks like the news, and its long unbroken takes are as frightening as anything in the genre. The people are thinner than the world around them, which keeps it just short of the top.

Alfonso Cuarón takes P. D. James’s novel about a Britain in which no child has been born for eighteen years and turns it into a chase. The year is 2027. Theo Faron (Clive Owen), a civil servant who drinks, is dragged back into the life of his former wife Julian (Julianne Moore) and asked to move a young woman across the country. Why she matters becomes clear early, and we will leave it there. The film runs 109 minutes, carries a 15, and moves as if something behind it were on fire.

The world is the achievement. Geoffrey Kirkland and Jim Clay build a London that is recognisably ours with the paint gone: rubbish burning in the road, rickshaws, refugees in cages on the pavement, government adverts for a suicide kit sold over the counter. Nothing is explained by a caption. Jany Temime puts Theo in a coat that looks slept in and the rebels in the hoodies of any bus shelter. We believed all of it, which is the first job of a film like this and the one most of them fail.

Emmanuel Lubezki shoots it handheld in grey and green, with lenses that catch the flare of every bulb, and he lets scenes run unbroken for minutes. The ambush on a country road, taken in what appears to be a single shot from inside the car, is the most frightening sequence we have seen in a science fiction film in years: a burning car rolls down a hill towards the windscreen, motorbikes arrive, and the camera stays in the back seat because that is where we would be. We were gripped, and then we were shaking. Later a long walk through a refugee camp under fire does the same thing at greater length, with blood on the lens that nobody wipes off.

Some critics have called these takes a stunt. We disagree. Watching them, we were not thinking about how it was done; we were looking for the exit. What is thin is not the filming but the people in it. The screenplay, credited to Cuarón, Timothy J. Sexton, David Arata, Mark Fergus and Hawk Ostby, passes Theo from one guardian to the next like a parcel, and Kee (Clare-Hope Ashitey) is asked to be the future of the species rather than a young woman, which is a hard part and the script gives her little help. Chiwetel Ejiofor’s Luke gets one good speech and not much else.

Owen is the right man. He plays Theo as someone who stopped caring years ago and resents being made to start again, and he does it without a single scene of visible decision. Michael Caine’s Jasper, an old cartoonist in a cottage in the woods with a jar of cannabis and a wife who no longer speaks, is the warmth the film has, and Caine plays him without asking to be liked. Pam Ferris’s Miriam, a former midwife, and Peter Mullan’s Syd, a camp guard who talks about himself in the third person, are two small performances that stay with you.

John Tavener’s choral music is used sparingly and then, near the end, is not, and the last stretch leans on it harder than it needs to. Cuarón and Alex Rodríguez cut to the pace of a man being chased, and the one scene that stops for exposition, at Jasper’s kitchen table, tells us more than we needed and less than the pictures already had. And yet there is a moment late on that undid us completely, and we will not describe it. We had not expected to cry at a film this cold, and we did.

Against the genre it stands high. Most dystopias build a world to admire; this one builds a world to get out of, and the getting out is the film. See it in a cinema if you can, with the sound up, and do not read anything about the last half hour.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

70
Positive
14
Mixed
2
Negative
3

Most critics admire Children of Men, and the praise clusters almost entirely on Alfonso Cuarón’s direction. Review after review singles out the handheld, documentary-style camerawork and the long unbroken takes, particularly in the chase and battle sequences, for making a near-future Britain feel plausible and dangerous rather than fanciful. Several also credit the film for trusting its audience, declining to over-explain the infertility premise, and for the detail of its world-building, which later reviews find has aged into prescience.

The reservations gather around the writing. Several critics find the script cumbersome, the characters stock or underdeveloped, and the political message glib. Eye for Film objects only to the ending, which it thinks imposes a sentiment the film has otherwise avoided. The dissent is real: The AV Club argues the celebrated long takes are showy stunts that drain tension, and Slant finds a referential pastiche with no coherent vision. The spread runs from full marks to one star.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Jamie Russell
100

The critic calls it a startling take on the novel that reworks its themes through a post-9/11 lens. They single out Cuarón's visceral vérité camerawork and tense unbroken shots for bringing the War on Terror realities home to Britain.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 December 2006 · Manohla Dargis
90*

The critic calls the film a superbly directed political thriller that pictures a darkly plausible future. She singles out its ambitious, intelligent filmmaking and the way it speaks to adults about the present through speculative fiction.

Read the full review →
The Times
21 September 2006 · James Christopher
90*

Alfonso Cuarón’s apocalyptic thriller is an entertaining and utterly barking vision of the future, a magnificently deranged satire. Cuarón’s crazy dystopia knocks rivals into a cocked hat with realistic close-quarter panic and violence.

Read the full review →
Time Out
19 September 2006 · Dave Calhoun
90*

The critic hails Cuarón's thrilling, credible near-future vision of a violent, paranoid Britain as a clever chase yarn with sharp social commentary. They single out the director's bold documentary-style handheld shooting and refusal to over-explain for making the film involving and provocative.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
11 September 2016 · Luke Walpole
80*

The critic praises the film's prescient dystopian vision of a collapsing society marked by infertility, nationalism and refugee crises. They single out Cuarón's hyper-realistic handheld camerawork and long takes for making the story feel authentic and urgent.

Read the full review →
Empire
18 September 2006 · Damon Wise
70*

Cuarón delivers a milestone action-satire that bends genre conventions with bravura long takes and immersive world-building in a dystopian Britain. The film is visually stunning and inventive, though its moral message feels somewhat glib.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Children of Men worth watching?
Children of Men is worth watching for anyone who can take a fast, frightening dystopia, and we scored it 85. Alfonso Cuarón's near-future London looks like the news with the paint gone, and Emmanuel Lubezki's long unbroken takes are as gripping as anything in the genre. The people are thinner than the world around them, which keeps it just short of the top.
How long is Children of Men, and what is it rated?
Children of Men runs 1h 49m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a science fiction and thriller film.
Where can I watch Children of Men in the US?
Children of Men is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Children of Men, and is it suitable for children?
Children of Men carries a UK 15 and is not suitable for children. It is a chase through a war zone, with an ambush on a country road and a long walk through a refugee camp under fire, both shot to make you feel you are in the back seat; blood lands on the lens and stays there. The squeamish and anyone under fifteen should sit this one out.
How does Children of Men compare to Threads?
Children of Men is the more watchable of the two; Threads is the harder to shake. Cuarón's film is a thriller, handheld and fast, with warmth from Michael Caine and a late moment that undid us. Mick Jackson's Threads films Sheffield after the bomb like a public information broadcast and offers no exit, so choose it only if you want a punishing evening.
Is Children of Men based on a true story or a book?
Children of Men is based on P. D. James's novel of the same name, not on a true story. Cuarón turns her book about a Britain where no child has been born for eighteen years into a chase across the country, and the film explains nothing with a caption. You do not need to have read the novel to follow it.
What should I watch after Children of Men?
After Children of Men, try Threads (1984, Fi1m 92): Sheffield after the bomb, filmed like a public information broadcast; far harder to watch than this. Then The Battle of Algiers (1966, Fi1m 93): The street fighting Cuarón is chasing, shot forty years earlier and no less immediate; and Never Let Me Go (2010, Fi1m 73): Another English dystopia in cardigans, quieter and sadder, with the horror kept politely offscreen.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2007

Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay

Saturn Awards, 2007

Won
Best Science Fiction Film

If you liked this, try…

  1. Threads (1984, Fi1m 92)Sheffield after the bomb, filmed like a public information broadcast; far harder to watch than this.

  2. The Battle of Algiers (1966, Fi1m 93)The street fighting Cuarón is chasing, shot forty years earlier and no less immediate.

  3. Never Let Me Go (2010, Fi1m 73)Another English dystopia in cardigans, quieter and sadder, with the horror kept politely offscreen.

  4. Y Tu Mamá También (2001, Fi1m 87)Cuarón’s earlier road film, where the country passing the window matters as much as the passengers.

  5. Snowpiercer (2013, Fi1m 80)A refugee’s march through a collapsing society, done as a train and a great deal louder.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever