Critics’ reviews

Delicatessen (1991)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 70: 7 positive, 1 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Delicatessen

70
Positive
7
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics like Delicatessen, and seven of the ten reviews are positive. The praise clusters on the look of the thing: the sets, the effects and the rhythmically edited set pieces get named again and again, along with the crowd of grotesque tenants above the butcher’s shop. Reviewers keep reaching for Gilliam and Lynch as points of comparison, and most mean it kindly. The balance of farce and horror, with a childlike centre under the cannibalism, is what wins them over.

The reservations cluster on originality and warmth. Several critics note how much the film owes to Brazil and find the whimsy sometimes overdone. The spread is wide: two reviews are negative. The AV Club calls it a stylistically sloppy early effort from Jeunet and Caro, while Slant finds it unfunny and short of compassion for its characters, who become props in a chase. The New York Times sits in the middle, finding it clever but not radically new.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Jack Yeovil
90*

The film is a delightfully original picture poised perfectly between farce and horror, with sinister undertones of much recent French cinema.

Read the full review →
Time Out
5 December 2014 · GA
90*

The near-future story of an ex-clown who takes a job above a butcher's shop and falls for the butcher's daughter is layered with inventive comic detail and grotesque characters. Visually evocative of Gilliam, Lynch and others, the film's sets, effects, pace and performances deliver brash, nightmarish humour that entertains from start to finish.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1990 · festival review · Variety Staff
90*

The zany little film is a startling and clever debut, beautifully textured, cleverly scripted and eerily shot, with a rich array of eccentrics and an outrageous montage of rhythmically edited visuals in a darkly bizarre futuristic world.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
10 April 1992 · Michael Wilmington
70*

The film is a nightmare comedy with a childlike center, mixing horrific images and macabre jolts with playful, weird unpredictability in a post-apocalyptic world of cannibalism. It is seen as an original with satisfying density, a true cult movie that outshocks American horror comedies.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 May 1992
50*

The critic finds the film clever but not radically new, noting its debts to Brazil and its whimsical elements that sometimes go too far, while praising its graceful slapstick humor and inventive blend of black comedy with sight gags.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
21 May 2006
30*

The critic finds the film unfunny and unappetizing, criticizing its lack of compassion for characters, preening preciousness, and repetitive cartoonish oppression that echoes Brazil without meaning. It faults the aggressive stylization for reducing characters to quirky props in a cat-and-mouse game.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
24 May 2006 · Tasha Robinson
30*

The critic views Delicatessen as a stylistically sloppy early effort by Jeunet and Caro that shows the roots of their later talent despite narrative flightiness and muddy execution. It praises the inventiveness in setpieces and energetic surrealism while noting it eventually descends into grotesquerie.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
4 May 2002 · Angus Wolfe Murray
90*

The critic describes it as superbly conceived and brilliantly executed, surpassing expectations with surreal humour that remains innocent while revelling in bizarre nightmare, highlighting its originality and simplicity.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
13 September 2010 · Jon Lyus
90*

The critic calls it a surrealistic masterpiece and a beautiful nightmare, praising its twisted logic, cinematography, and iconic scenes in a post-apocalyptic setting.

Read the full review →
Collider
26 October 2024 · Ima Ifum
85*

The critic calls Delicatessen a post-apocalyptic gem that blends eerie absurdity with grotesque comedy in a cannibalistic society. They single out the quirky, eccentric tenants and the playful slapstick humor that normalizes the violence.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate