Critics’ reviews

Donnie Darko (2001)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 77: 14 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Donnie Darko

77
Positive
14
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to Richard Kelly’s blend of teenage isolation, suburban satire and science fiction. Praise centres on Jake Gyllenhaal’s performance, the uncanny atmosphere and the recognisable adolescent awkwardness that grounds the stranger material. The reviews also value the film’s dry humour and depiction of 1980s suburbia, with its soundtrack and inventive photography drawing particular approval. Its emotional pull matters more to many critics than a fully explained plot.

Reservations concern how far that tolerance for confusion stretches. Several favourable reviews find the ideas more convincing than the storytelling, while the lone negative assessment, from The New York Times, sees the mixture of teen melodrama and magical realism as overreaching despite the cast and period setting. The different cuts also divide opinion: RogerEbert.com finds the director’s cut richer without requiring resolved mysteries, whereas Eye for Film argues that its explanations sacrifice mystery and trust in the audience.

Empire
· Alan Morrison
90*

The review praises the film's bizarre suburban paranoia and apocalyptic teen angst, highlighting Jake Gyllenhaal's performance and the effective use of the 1980s soundtrack as marking the arrival of a bold new talent.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
23 October 2001 · Ed Gonzalez
90*

The critic praises Richard Kelly’s debut as a blazingly original, Lynchian evocation of adolescent angst and 1980s suburbia transformed into an apocalyptic vision. It singles out the inventive sci-fi metaphors for teenage confusion and the film’s haunting take on Reagan-era repression and uncertainty.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
26 October 2001 · Scott Tobias
90*

The critic calls the film an audacious and frighteningly assured debut that vividly captures late-’80s suburbia through a personal mix of coming-of-age and science fiction. It singles out the dense, stylized amalgam of genres and influences that resists easy definition while satirizing Reagan-era hypocrisies.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
22 December 2016 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

Richard Kelly’s 2001 film on re-release is a captivating triumph that has matured well, with stronger political and satirical elements than first apparent in its suburban paranoia tale. The critic singles out the tremendous discovery of young Jake Gyllenhaal and the film’s blend of influences like Back to the Future and Twin Peaks.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Leslie Felperin
80*

The film is a cult movie in the making thanks to its uncanny atmosphere and intricate web of secretly connected details. The critic praises its distinctive texture that mixes multiple genres without settling in any one, along with its dry realism in depicting suburban life.

Read the full review →
Time Out
20 December 2016 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

This is an intelligent and enchanting reissue of Kelly’s emotionally resonant drama. The critic singles out the jukebox soundtrack and crisp, inventive photography as memorable elements that help make a bleak story of adolescent mental illness funny and entertaining.

Read the full review →
Vulture
31 March 2017
80*

The piece revisits the film as a well-made, well-acted, and imaginative cult classic that inflates pubescent angst into an apocalyptic experience. It singles out the still-effective weirdness and resonance of the ending as a time-travel mind-twister and commentary on American suburbia.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
29 December 2016 · Nigel Andrews
70*

The cult 2001 film returns in revival as a sci-fi/horror noir about a troubled teen, essentially Harvey from Hell, with a variable but life-like script. It praises the strong indie cast including Jake Gyllenhaal, Drew Barrymore and Patrick Swayze.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
30 March 2017 · Justin Chang
70*

The 4K restoration highlights the film's enduring power as a strange, melancholy debut that captures youthful alienation, suburban malaise, and cosmic upheaval with remarkable control and feeling. Chang notes its prescient timing and reverence for 1980s cultural touchstones.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
20 August 2004 · Roger Ebert
70*

The director's cut enriches the original without resolving its mysteries, making the film more engaging by embracing its paradoxes of time travel and a prescient rabbit. Ebert praises the tone, characters, and originality over logical closure.

Read the full review →
The Independent
24 October 2002
70*

The critic finds the film an engaging, dreamlike mix of genres with strong performances, especially from Jake Gyllenhaal, but notes that its ambitious ideas sometimes outrun its coherence as a first feature.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 October 2001 · Elvis Mitchell
30*

The film tries to blend John Hughes-style teen melodrama with magical realism but succumbs to overreaching into the protagonist's troubled mind, resulting in an unsatisfying experience despite strong elements like the cast and period setting.

Read the full review →
Collider
17 August 2011 · A- · Scott Wampler
90

The critic considers Donnie Darko a nearly instant cult classic and Richard Kelly's best film, praising its endlessly rewatchable plot, quirky tone, and star-making performance by Jake Gyllenhaal. He prefers the original cut over the director's cut and notes its strong appeal for repeat viewings despite later Kelly films falling short.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
17 June 2015 · Ryan Lambie
85*

The critic views Donnie Darko as a much-loved cult film that excels as a study of teenage isolation and outsider experiences in suburban America. They single out the honest, nuanced depiction of characters and everyday adolescent awkwardness for particular praise, noting how it grounds the sci-fi elements.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
11 October 2006 · Rory Ford
75*

The director's cut answers questions left by the original but loses some of its mystery and trust in the audience. It remains rewarding as a strong evocation of adolescence, with excellent photography, casting and direction.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate