Critics’ reviews

From Dusk Till Dawn (1996)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 65: 8 positive, 2 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of From Dusk Till Dawn

65
Positive
8
Mixed
2
Negative
2

Most critics like it, and most of them like it for the same reasons. The reviews are warm about the first hour, the hostage-taking and the drive for Mexico, and about George Clooney, whose performance is picked out again and again as the film’s centre of gravity. Rodriguez’s inventive kills and the gruesome effects work draw praise, as do the dialogue and the energy of the thing. Several critics recommend going in knowing as little as possible.

The reservations cluster on the second half. Even admirers call the vampire mayhem uneven or juvenile, and the spread is wide. The Hollywood Reporter finds the horror-comedy overblown and revolting rather than substantial, and the Los Angeles Times admires the fight choreography while dismissing the conceit itself as road kill. The New Yorker calls the second half cheesy and derivative. The 1996 notices are the coolest; later reviews are fonder, treating the genre switch as the point.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Mark Salisbury
90*

The critic calls it a rollicking, slam-bang piece of entertainment that fuses guns and vampires for a blood-soaked blast. They single out the fun monster mash and strong performances, especially George Clooney's.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

This splatter-action horror delivers sharp dialogue, excessive violence, great effects, and bad taste with stylish verve as crooks take hostages and face vampires in a sleazy bar. Energetic filmmaking and engaging performances make it a hilarious, raucous gore-fest.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TCh
80*

The critic recommends going in blind for maximum effect and highlights the film's over-the-top mix of gun-crazy sleaze, macho mayhem, and vampiric strippers. Rodriguez is praised for inventive kills and turning Clooney into a star while giving Tarantino a decent performance.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
28 July 2020 · Jesse Hassenger
75*

The review describes the film as a fun, gory hybrid where the first half delivers tense Tarantino crime drama and the second unleashes Rodriguez's kinetic vampire action with gruesome effects and sight gags, singling out Harvey Keitel's performance as a standout grounding force amid the mayhem.

Read the full review →
The Independent
6 June 1996 · John Lyttle
70*

The film has nothing new to add to vampire lore and borrows its plots shamelessly, but it is hard to care because of the many treats, jokes, stunts and gross FX along the way. It exemplifies big, tired junky genre pictures played fast and furious and funny.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
19 January 1996 · Janet Maslin
70*

The critic finds the first hour promising and down-and-dirty as the Gecko brothers take hostages and head for Mexico, but notes the film raises questions about its violent, profane style. She highlights George Clooney's star potential and the pitch-black satire in the early sections.

Read the full review →
Variety
21 January 1996 · Todd McCarthy
70*

The critic calls it a deliriously trashy, exuberantly vulgar exploitation picture that will appeal to teenage boys with its road-kill and vampire gorefest elements, while noting it provides potent box office potential for the target audience. George Clooney's star-making performance is singled out as a center of gravity amid the juvenile gross-out material.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
19 January 1996 · Roger Ebert
65*

The critic finds the first half a clever Tarantino-style crime/hostage story with strong dialogue and the second half a gory vampire mayhem sequence, praising Clooney's debut and some inventive touches while noting the film is a skillful but uneven pro job that the filmmakers could have elevated further.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
29 January 1996
50*

The film is seen as a modestly berserk action picture that delivers expected unnatural disasters with confidence after an entertaining opening, though the second half turns cheesy and derivative of Night of the Living Dead. Rodriguez's wild action sequences and editing nearly redeem the sluggish first half.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
19 January 1996
30*

The review describes the film as a film nerd’s fever dream mixing mismatched genres and styles, with the first hour focused on bank-robbing brothers holding hostages and the second delivering frantic bloody mayhem. It praises the craftsmanship of the fight sequences but calls the overall conceit road kill.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
18 January 1996 · David Hunter
30*

The film starts promisingly as a tense crime drama but turns into an overblown, grotesque horror-comedy that fails to deliver. Rodriguez's hyper-kinetic mayhem and excessive gore leave a lasting impression of revulsion rather than substance.

Read the full review →
Polygon
19 January 2026 · Isaac Rouse
80*

The critic recalls the film's shocking genre shift from crime thriller to vampire horror as a defining moment that turned him into a horror fan. He praises its audacious structure and enduring appeal as a cult classic that influenced later works.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate