Santanico Pandemonium (Salma Hayek) standing in a crowded bar with cheering patrons
Film review

From Dusk Till Dawn

1996 · Directed by Robert Rodriguez · 1h 48m · MPA R

In a sentenceGeorge Clooney looks as though he could organise this bloodbath, if anyone would stop shouting long enough

Seth Gecko (George Clooney) and his brother Richard (Quentin Tarantino) are bank robbers heading for Mexico. They take hostages, bringing other people into a journey governed by threats and violence. Harvey Keitel plays Jacob Fuller, with Juliette Lewis as Kate Fuller and Ernest Liu as Scott Fuller. Robert Rodriguez directs from a screenplay by Tarantino, following the criminals and their captives through a story that combines crime, action and horror. Salma Hayek Pinault, Cheech Marin and Danny Trejo also appear in the cast.

Fi1m review

George Clooney gives this grubby crime-and-horror mixture enough authority to keep us watching through its excesses. Robert Rodriguez makes the violence inventive, but the second half is less compelling than the hostage-taking that gets us there.

From Dusk Till Dawn is good, grubby entertainment, though its appetite for mayhem eventually gets ahead of its ability to hold our interest. Robert Rodriguez directs Quentin Tarantino’s screenplay as if giving this material respectable manners would be a serious waste of everyone’s time. That confidence carries a great deal of it, especially while the film stays close to its criminals and their hostages. George Clooney plays Seth Gecko, with Tarantino alongside him as his brother Richard.

The brothers are bank robbers heading for Mexico, and taking hostages is part of their route there. Tarantino gives their exchanges enough bite to make spending time with them disturbingly enjoyable, even while other people are being threatened. We caught ourselves liking their company, and it made us uncomfortable. The early crime scenes sustain that awkward feeling because the dialogue is funny without making the men delivering it seem harmless.

Clooney is the main reason this works. He gives Seth authority without asking us to mistake him for a decent man, and makes the dialogue sound like something a person might actually say under pressure. Tarantino is less assured, but Richard’s unpleasantness gives his performance a useful place to put its awkwardness. Clooney also provides some welcome steadiness in a film where the urge to be outrageous can make almost everything feel overemphasised.

Guillermo Navarro photographs the sleaze with enough polish to make its appeal faintly troubling. Cecilia Montiel’s production design helps make this a convincing place for people with no intention of behaving themselves. Those choices work because the early hostage scenes need an ugly atmosphere as well as clever dialogue. The visual pleasure never quite lets us forget what sort of men we are following, which gives the crime material more weight than its jokes might suggest.

The second half takes a turn we will not describe, and Rodriguez handles the change with more assurance than the script quite earns. As his own editor, he gives the action a force and speed that suit the material, keeping the violence inventive long after it has ceased to surprise. Individual sequences offer the pleasure of watching someone solve a complicated practical problem at speed. Graeme Revell’s music helps to sell the mayhem as entertainment, although it adds less personality than the actors do.

The difficulty is that the film grows less interesting as it grows more frantic. Tarantino’s script gives up too much of the early crime drama’s tension, and the later excess cannot entirely replace the pleasure of listening to these people. Some of the gross-out humour feels aimed at an audience still delighted to discover that adults can be offended. Rodriguez’s skill keeps the action watchable, but there are stretches when another burst of violence offers little reason to pay closer attention.

For an exploitation film, giving the audience something to wince at is part of the job, and Rodriguez takes that obligation seriously. The mixture of crime, action and horror is handled with a confidence that makes its unevenness forgivable if these are already genres we enjoy. At 108 minutes, though, it has time to exhaust some of its own jokes. Watch it for Clooney if the genre appeals; he will not make it suitable for the squeamish.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

65
Positive
8
Mixed
2
Negative
2

Most critics like it, and most of them like it for the same reasons. The reviews are warm about the first hour, the hostage-taking and the drive for Mexico, and about George Clooney, whose performance is picked out again and again as the film’s centre of gravity. Rodriguez’s inventive kills and the gruesome effects work draw praise, as do the dialogue and the energy of the thing. Several critics recommend going in knowing as little as possible.

The reservations cluster on the second half. Even admirers call the vampire mayhem uneven or juvenile, and the spread is wide. The Hollywood Reporter finds the horror-comedy overblown and revolting rather than substantial, and the Los Angeles Times admires the fight choreography while dismissing the conceit itself as road kill. The New Yorker calls the second half cheesy and derivative. The 1996 notices are the coolest; later reviews are fonder, treating the genre switch as the point.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Mark Salisbury
90*

The critic calls it a rollicking, slam-bang piece of entertainment that fuses guns and vampires for a blood-soaked blast. They single out the fun monster mash and strong performances, especially George Clooney's.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

This splatter-action horror delivers sharp dialogue, excessive violence, great effects, and bad taste with stylish verve as crooks take hostages and face vampires in a sleazy bar. Energetic filmmaking and engaging performances make it a hilarious, raucous gore-fest.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TCh
80*

The critic recommends going in blind for maximum effect and highlights the film's over-the-top mix of gun-crazy sleaze, macho mayhem, and vampiric strippers. Rodriguez is praised for inventive kills and turning Clooney into a star while giving Tarantino a decent performance.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
28 July 2020 · Jesse Hassenger
75*

The review describes the film as a fun, gory hybrid where the first half delivers tense Tarantino crime drama and the second unleashes Rodriguez's kinetic vampire action with gruesome effects and sight gags, singling out Harvey Keitel's performance as a standout grounding force amid the mayhem.

Read the full review →
The Independent
6 June 1996 · John Lyttle
70*

The film has nothing new to add to vampire lore and borrows its plots shamelessly, but it is hard to care because of the many treats, jokes, stunts and gross FX along the way. It exemplifies big, tired junky genre pictures played fast and furious and funny.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
19 January 1996 · Janet Maslin
70*

The critic finds the first hour promising and down-and-dirty as the Gecko brothers take hostages and head for Mexico, but notes the film raises questions about its violent, profane style. She highlights George Clooney's star potential and the pitch-black satire in the early sections.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is From Dusk Till Dawn worth watching?
From Dusk Till Dawn is worth watching for anyone who already enjoys crime, action and horror mixed without much regard for good manners, and we scored it 75. George Clooney's authority as Seth Gecko carries the film through its excesses, and the early hostage scenes are the best of it. The frantic second half is less compelling than the crime drama that gets us there.
How long is From Dusk Till Dawn, and what is it rated?
From Dusk Till Dawn runs 1h 48m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a horror and action film.
Where can I watch From Dusk Till Dawn in the US?
From Dusk Till Dawn is streaming on The Roku Channel and Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. It leaves The Roku Channel on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is From Dusk Till Dawn, and is it suitable for children?
From Dusk Till Dawn is an 18 certificate in the UK and rated R in the US, and it is not suitable for children. It is a grubby exploitation film built on threats, hostage-taking and inventive, sustained violence, with gross-out humour designed to make the audience wince. The squeamish should stay away; it is for adults who know what they are letting themselves in for.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Near Dark (1987, Fi1m 82)Another grubby nocturnal outing whose dangerous company is half the appeal.

  2. Assault on Precinct 13 (1976) · not reviewed yetFor tense confinement and economical action that makes every threat count.

  3. Braindead (1992) · not reviewed yetFor those who find elaborate practical gore funnier than anyone reasonably should.

  4. A Bittersweet Life (2005) · not reviewed yetA more controlled crime film with forceful action and costly loyalties.

  5. The Mission (1999) · not reviewed yetFor criminals whose professional composure makes the sudden violence more effective.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever