Motoko Kusanagi (Atsuko Tanaka) perched high on a structure above the city
Film review

Ghost in the Shell

1995 · Directed by Mamoru Oshii · 1h 23m · MPA NR

In a sentenceThe city is worth getting lost in, which is fortunate given the state of the plot

Motoko Kusanagi (Atsuko Tanaka) stands at the centre of Mamoru Oshii’s animated science-fiction thriller about human identity in a digital age. Around her are Batou (Akio Otsuka), Togusa (Koichi Yamadera) and Ishikawa (Yutaka Nakano), while Iemasa Kayumi voices the Puppetmaster. Against dystopian cityscapes and cyberspace interfaces, organic bodies and machinery become increasingly difficult to separate. Violence and encounters with technology bring questions of personhood into the story: what makes a human being distinct, and what happens when that distinction no longer holds?

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Mamoru Oshii’s Ghost in the Shell is absorbing, melancholy science fiction, with a city more vivid than several of its people. The plotting can be needlessly opaque, but the images make its questions about identity worth the work.

Mamoru Oshii’s Ghost in the Shell is absorbing science fiction whose questions about being human deserve the attention its plotting demands. It considers what happens when organic and mechanical life become difficult to tell apart, putting the question inside a violent thriller. At 83 minutes, it has little interest in easing us into the subject, and some of its explanations make matters harder. We recommend it for the patient viewer: the animated city gives Oshii’s ideas a convincing setting long before the dialogue finishes spelling them out.

Hisao Shirai’s cinematography makes the crowded cityscapes readable without making them tidy. Buildings and cyberspace interfaces demand attention because they seem to belong to a place with more going on than the story can contain. The amount of detail matters: technology has become ordinary here, something to live among rather than stop and admire. We felt unexpectedly lonely looking at this city. The sheer density of the surroundings makes the characters seem isolated, and that feeling brings the film’s questions about identity closer than the dialogue often manages.

Shuichi Kakesu’s editing allows the images to linger, resisting the demand to hurry back to the action. That patience pays off because we need time to look, not merely register another elaborate background. Kenji Kawai’s music contributes to the melancholy rather than trying to make every moment exciting. It helps sustain an uneasy mood even when we are not keeping up with every implication of the story. These stretches are absorbing enough that the brief running time never feels like a restriction.

Oshii also keeps returning to exposed bodies, putting flesh beside the mechanical elements that complicate our response to it. There is an obvious risk of turning the question into an excuse for undressing an animated woman. The film does not entirely escape that discomfort, and we would not want to pretend that it does. Yet the repeated stripping makes physical appearance an unreliable guide to who someone is, which gives the nudity a reason to be here beyond decoration.

The difficulty is Kazunori Ito’s screenplay, which sometimes makes its people sound as though they have been brought in to clarify the reading. Explanations arrive heavily, while the plotting can still be hard to follow. We do not need every uncertainty resolved, but occasionally the effort of following events gets in the way of considering their meaning. The characters also have too little life beyond the questions they raise. Atsuko Tanaka’s restraint as the voice of Motoko Kusanagi suits the film’s coolness, although it cannot entirely overcome that distance.

There is something welcome in a science-fiction film that does not treat technological change simply as a threat to be defeated. Oshii is interested in what humanity might become, and lets that possibility remain unsettling without insisting that it must be dreadful. The violent action keeps this from becoming a lecture for long, and its precision supplies some pleasure that needs no explanation. We would accept a little more warmth, but the willingness to take an unfamiliar idea seriously is reason enough to stay. Give it an evening when nobody needs cheering up.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

83
Positive
9
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are uniformly positive, and the praise gathers around the same two things: the ideas and the look. Most critics treat Oshii’s film as a serious inquiry into identity, memory and what remains of a person inside a manufactured body, and several note how far ahead of its time its picture of a data-saturated world looks. The animation is singled out repeatedly, with the central city sequence named more than once as the point where the film’s brooding, melancholic mood comes into focus.

The spread is narrow; the reservations are about density rather than quality. Time Out finds the characters closer to ciphers than people, and The Skinny notes clumsy exposition and a plot hard to follow at first. The Guardian goes furthest, calling it too opaque to invest in fully while saying it should be seen. Sight and Sound admits a first impression of dullness that a rewatch with subtitles corrects. Nobody dislikes it; a few find it cold.

The AV Club
17 April 2014 · David Ehrlich
90*

The critic hails Oshii's film as a philosophical treatise and cybernetic noir that confidently explores identity and technology's inevitability rather than fearing it. It singles out the film's visual and thematic merging of organic and mechanical elements, particularly through the Major's repeated stripping scenes, as a striking illustration of human confusion in a digital age.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
· Robbie Collin
90*

Oshii’s film is described as a sci-fi masterpiece of profound and melancholic beauty that remains essential. It is praised for its prophetic vision of data-saturated worlds, balletic action and a standout central animated sequence, with a cold, brooding mood.

Read the full review →
Total Film
2 June 2015 · Rob Power
90*

The critic revisits the 1995 anime as a sophisticated, adult-oriented classic that blends philosophical depth with visceral action and stunning visuals. They single out its prescient exploration of identity, consciousness and humanity in a cyberpunk world, along with its beautiful animation and immersive soundtrack.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
18 March 2017 · Greg Evans
85*

The piece praises Oshii’s film for its layered examination of identity, the ghost/shell divide and individuality in an artificial society. It singles out the central city sequence and philosophical dialogue with the Puppet Master for revealing new ideas on existence and change.

Read the full review →
Time Out
22 September 2014 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

The critic praises the film's dizzying, ideas-heavy cyberpunk story and moments of visual poetry in its detailed dystopian cityscapes and cyberspace interfaces. They note that the dense plot and cipher-like characters are offset by its mind-expanding sci-fi strangeness.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
12 August 2020
75*

The entry describes the 1995 film as a dense, Kubrickian political drama that improves on rewatch with subtitles, noting its intellectual detachment, visual poetry and influence while acknowledging an initial impression of dullness. It highlights the compact adaptation of the manga and its philosophical questions.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Ghost in the Shell worth watching?
Ghost in the Shell is worth watching for anyone patient with science fiction that puts ideas about identity ahead of clear plotting, and we scored it 83. Hisao Shirai's crowded, melancholy city does more of the work than Kazunori Ito's heavy explanations, and the characters have little life beyond the questions they raise. Give it an evening when nobody needs cheering up.
How long is Ghost in the Shell, and what is it rated?
Ghost in the Shell runs 1h 23m and is rated NR by the MPA in the US. It is an action and animation film.
Where can I watch Ghost in the Shell in the US?
Ghost in the Shell is streaming on Amazon Prime Video, Tubi and The Roku Channel in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. It leaves Tubi on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Ghost in the Shell, and is it suitable for children?
Ghost in the Shell is a 15 certificate in the UK, and it is not for children. It is a violent thriller with repeated nudity, since Oshii keeps returning to exposed bodies alongside mechanical ones, and its mood is cool and unsettling rather than frightening. Older teenagers who can sit through opaque plotting will manage; the squeamish will not enjoy the action.
How does Ghost in the Shell compare to Akira?
Ghost in the Shell is the quieter and more melancholy of the two, while Akira is the more violent and headlong. Both build hand-drawn cities dense enough to make their people seem small, and both make bodies frighteningly vulnerable to technology. Choose Oshii's film for patient, uneasy ideas about identity, and Otomo's for hurtling action, bearing in mind that each leaves its characters underdrawn.
What should I watch after Ghost in the Shell?
After Ghost in the Shell, try Akira (1988, Fi1m 83): For animated urban detail and bodies made frighteningly vulnerable to technological change. Then Blade Runner (1982, Fi1m 85): Another crowded city where artificial people make being human difficult to define; and Solaris (1972, Fi1m 87): For science fiction that takes its time over consciousness, loneliness and doubt.

Cast

Awards

Animation Kobe Theatrical Film Award, 1996

Won
Animation Kobe Theatrical Film Award

Annie Award for Best Animated Feature, 1996

Nominated
Annie Award for Best Animated Feature

If you liked this, try…

  1. Akira (1988, Fi1m 83)For animated urban detail and bodies made frighteningly vulnerable to technological change.

  2. Blade Runner (1982, Fi1m 85)Another crowded city where artificial people make being human difficult to define.

  3. Solaris (1972, Fi1m 87)For science fiction that takes its time over consciousness, loneliness and doubt.

  4. The Face of Another (1966) · not reviewed yetA changed face makes familiar questions about identity feel intimate and unpleasant.

  5. After Yang (2021) · not reviewed yetArtificial life and human grief, approached with patience and a gentler touch.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever