Critics’ reviews

Howards End (1992)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 83: 10 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Howards End

83
Positive
10
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Most critics warmly recommend Howards End, with praise centred on Emma Thompson’s emotional precision and the strength of the ensemble, particularly Anthony Hopkins. The reviews admire the period detail, assured storytelling and intelligent handling of class and social connection. Several see the adaptation as evidence that traditional literary filmmaking can be both entertaining and searching, with the handsome settings allowing a troubling account of money and privilege to emerge.

Reservations concern what is lost in adapting Forster. The AV Club and The New Yorker find that some complexity falls away, while Time Out objects to the screenplay’s length and reliance on black-outs. The spread is largely between enthusiasm and qualified approval, though Slant Magazine offers a sharper dissent: it finds the decorative style empty and the dialogue too explicit, while still valuing Thompson and Vanessa Redgrave. Even where critics disagree about the adaptation, the performances retain considerable support.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
100

This elegant adaptation never hides grim insights into the upper middle classes while delivering perfect period detail and extraordinarily convincing portraits from Anthony Hopkins and Emma Thompson. It stands as one of the finest conversions of a novel to cinema.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
15 April 1992 · Kenneth Turan
90*

The critic urges surrender to the film's assured storytelling, remarkable acting, and rich period detail as a peak of traditional filmmaking. They single out the complex emotional depth achieved by the long-collaborating Merchant-Ivory-Jhabvala team and especially Emma Thompson's performance.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
30 April 1992 · Derek Malcolm
90*

The critic praises the film as one of Merchant Ivory's best, highlighting the excellent performances, particularly by Anthony Hopkins and Emma Thompson, and its faithful adaptation of the novel's themes of class and connection.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo
85*

Merchant Ivory delivers a handsome, intelligent and witty adaptation with a perfect cast. Thompson is wonderful in this delightful, pacey period piece that stands as one of their most memorable films.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Lizzie Francke
80*

The film delivers a more troubling and rigorous inquest into a bygone era than usual Merchant Ivory adaptations. It highlights the grasping Wilcoxes as villains and gives moral weight to the Basts' perspective on class and modernity.

Read the full review →
The Independent
1 May 1993 · Laurence Earle
80*

Merchant-Ivory's third and most successful adaptation of Forster is a complex tale of class distinction in Edwardian England. Emma Thompson and Anthony Hopkins deliver standout performances in this story of social connections.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
3 March 2010 · B · Scott Tobias
77

The film earns praise for Thompson's magnificent central performance and graceful bursts of emotion but is faulted for gliding over the novel's complexity and rushing key relationships. The adaptation's patient unfolding leads to a devastating conclusion despite narrative sacrifices.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
27 April 1992 · Terrence Rafferty
75*

The review calls the film a handsome, intelligent, and faithful dramatization that succeeds as storytelling thanks to strong performances, especially by Emma Thompson and Vanessa Redgrave. It praises the adaptation's skill but notes it misses some of Forster's deeper narrative strain and commentary.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· MS
70*

The impeccable performances, led by Emma Thompson's seductive saintliness as Margaret, elevate the saga of inheritance, class clashes and tragedy. Ruth Prawer Jhabvala's overlong screenplay relies too heavily on black-outs to fit the novel's incidents.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
2 November 2009 · Eric Henderson

The film is seen as a luxurious but empty frame, with Merchant-Ivory's fussy style and declarative dialogue failing to capture subtleties. Thompson and Redgrave's intelligent performances are singled out as the main elements that guide viewers through the episodic narrative.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
13 March 1992 · Jeff Menell

The critic finds the film a sumptuous visual delight with rich texture and substance from start to finish. Thompson's compassionate and humorous performance as Margaret is singled out as the lifeblood of the picture alongside the ensemble and cinematography.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
13 March 1992 · Critic's Pick · Vincent Canby

The critic hails the Merchant-Ivory-Jhabvala team's adaptation as a richly textured triumph that outshines other attempts at literary adaptations. They single out the film's entertaining depth and the team's consistent excellence with Forster material.

Read the full review →
Collider
27 October 2009 · Andre Dellamorte
85*

The critic calls the film a masterful work that creates sympathy and urgency in its characters' plights, praising its brisk pacing, beautiful cinematography, strong performances (especially Emma Thompson and Anthony Hopkins), and its status as a crown jewel of Merchant-Ivory's career.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate