Last Breath (2025)

The critic praises it as a shockingly good, breathtaking thriller that builds tangible suspense through detailed process and technology, delivering heart-attack tension and documentary-like clarity in a lean, elegant package.

The critic calls it a gripping, taut adventure thriller that pares the story to essentials without wasting time and ratchets up tension effectively in a claustrophobic setting. It praises the authentic depiction of the events, the director's command of suspense, and strong supporting performances.

The critic calls it an unbearably tense deep-sea drama based on real events. They praise the camerawork above and below water that plunges viewers into the survival thriller.

Parksinson's remake of his documentary delivers adrenaline through procedural detail of saturation diving and the team's solidarity under pressure.

A compact, journalistic true-life rescue thriller that sticks to facts without hype, effectively building suspense through specific details of saturation diving and the accident. Parkinson's debut impresses with its nuts-and-bolts tension and low-key payoff.

Straightforward survival thriller impresses with attention to small human moments in the life-or-death struggle and unfussy performances that make a compelling, touching story.

The critic describes a queasy thriller about saturation divers that conveys the vastness and terror of the ocean. They praise the believable performances and Harrelson's levity amid the tension.

It succeeds as a technical feat with chilling, claustrophobic underwater cinematography and a grounded sense of danger drawn from the real events, but falls short emotionally due to thin characterizations and forced romantic beats.

The film delivers expected men's adventure thrills with tense underwater peril but suffers from formulaic style, overheated dialogue, and underdeveloped emotions. It succeeds most in its process-oriented action and documentary-rooted realism.

Keeps a firm grip on the rescue operation for genuine thrills but adherence to real events causes dragging and lacks emotional depth on the human terror.

The review finds the underwater thriller suspenseful but criticizes it for being all surface and no depth, with thin characterizations and emotional shortcomings despite the gripping premise.

A blandly directed true-life adventure that feels like cinematic comfort food, disappointingly shallow with trite stakes and lethargic pacing. Harrelson provides some amusement in a mostly stationary role.

The film is a curiously bloodless account of a real-life disaster, undercutting its own drama by remaining too faithful to the source documentary. It singles out the lack of emotional stakes and monosyllabic characters for complaint, despite some gripping tension.

The critic finds the film a worthwhile claustrophobic ride thanks to excellent direction and technical spectacle in the underwater sequences, but notes it lacks heart and engaging characters compared to the documentary.

The critic praises the stunning underwater cinematography, sound design, and immersive true-story tension, while noting some flat dialogue and limited character development.

The critic finds the film unconvincing and patchy, preferring the real documentary version of events; the script is wooden and the underwater sequences fail to capture the scariness of the deep sea despite the director's familiarity with the subject.

The critic finds the narrative film a hollow re-creation of the source documentary, underwritten and overly muscled due to its slavish devotion to facts that waters down the drama and urgency. Harrelson brings some depth as one diver, but other characters remain ciphers and the tension dissipates.