Lilly D'Abo (Ingrid Torelli) bound to a chair as June Ross-Mitchell (Laura Gordon) and Jack Delroy (David Dastmalchian) attend to her
Film review

Late Night with the Devil

2024 · Directed by Cameron Cairnes, Colin Cairnes · 1h 33m · MPA R

In a sentenceNinety minutes of brown suits, wide lapels and a girl who will not stop looking at the camera

It is Halloween night, 1977, and Jack Delroy (David Dastmalchian) hosts a late-night chat show that is losing viewers and needs a big night. He books a medium, Christou (Fayssal Bazzi); a professional sceptic, Carmichael Haig (Ian Bliss); a parapsychologist, June Ross-Mitchell (Laura Gordon); and Lilly (Ingrid Torelli), the teenage girl June has been studying, who is said to have something living inside her. The film presents itself as the master tape of that broadcast, recovered afterwards, with the advertisement breaks filled by footage shot backstage. Cameron and Colin Cairnes write, direct and edit.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

The Cairnes brothers rebuild a 1977 chat show down to the last flared lapel and let a demon loose on it, and for an hour it is the sharpest horror film we have seen in a while. Then it stops trusting its own format.

Jack Delroy (David Dastmalchian) hosts a late-night chat show that is losing to the competition, and on Halloween night 1977 he books a psychic, a sceptic, a parapsychologist and the possessed teenage girl she has written a book about. The film presents itself as the master tape of that broadcast, found after the fact, with the ad breaks filled by footage shot backstage. Cameron and Colin Cairnes, who wrote, directed and edited it, keep almost all of its 93 minutes on one set. For an hour it is the cleverest horror film we have seen in some time. Then it breaks its own rules, and we will come to that.

The set is the first thing that persuades you. Otello Stolfo builds the studio in orange, brown and mustard: a desk, a sofa, a curtain, a small band off to one side, potted ferns nobody has watered. Matthew Temple shoots the broadcast to look like videotape of the period, whites bleeding, reds smearing, the camera moving only when a studio camera would have moved. Between segments the film drops into grainy black and white handheld backstage. Steph Hooke gives Delroy a suit with lapels you could land a plane on and a tie the width of a scarf, and everyone else looks exactly as uncomfortable as television made people look in 1977. We believed in the studio inside two minutes and never stopped.

Dastmalchian has spent years as the odd man at the edge of other people’s films, and here he is the centre and holds it. Delroy is charming in the way hosts were: the smile arrives a beat before the eyes agree to it. He knows his ratings and he knows what a night like this might cost him. Dastmalchian plays the whole broadcast as a man deciding, one segment at a time, how far he is prepared to go, and the deciding is visible on his face. Rhys Auteri, as Gus McConnell, his sidekick, plays the one man in the building who would rather go home.

The guests are well chosen. Fayssal Bazzi’s Christou works the studio audience like a man who has done it in worse rooms. Carmichael Haig is the professional sceptic, all cufflinks and contempt, with a cheque in his pocket for anyone who can prove him wrong. Laura Gordon’s June Ross-Mitchell is careful, worried and out of her depth. And then there is Ingrid Torelli’s Lilly. Torelli has a habit of turning away from whoever is speaking and looking straight into the lens, at us, with a small polite smile, and holding it a second longer than is comfortable. It costs nothing and it is the most unsettling thing in the film. We shifted in our seats every time she did it, and were more frightened by that stare than by anything later with blood in it. Glenn Richards and Roscoe James Irwin give the house band a brassy theme that plays on every return from the break and sounds a little more like a funeral march each time.

Now the problem. The film’s rule is that we see only what the cameras saw. The backstage black and white already bends that rule, since nobody is holding that camera and nobody explains who is, and for an hour we forgave it because the material was good. Later on, in ways we will not describe, the Cairnes brothers stop keeping to the rule altogether, and a film that frightened us with a child’s stare reaches for tools we have seen in plenty of other horror films. A few critics have made the same complaint, and we think it is the right one.

The Cairneses are open about their debts. Ghostwatch, the BBC’s 1992 live-broadcast-goes-wrong drama, did this on actual television to an actual country, and no film made for cinemas can have that advantage. Network is in here too, in the way everyone on the studio floor treats a possible possession as a scheduling matter. What the brothers add is affection: they plainly love this kind of television, its terrible ferns and its worse ties, and the satire is warmer for it.

Watch it late, with the lights off, which is how it wants to be watched, and try not to read anything about the last act before you get there. When it arrives, remember the hour that came before. The hour is the film.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

79
Positive
10
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics are won over, and they largely agree on why. The praise clusters on David Dastmalchian as the failing chat-show host, described again and again as the film’s anchor, and on the recreation of a 1977 late-night broadcast, from the sets and sound to the rhythm of a live studio. The found-footage conceit is widely judged fresh, with several reviews reaching for Ghostwatch and The Exorcist as reference points.

Reservations are consistent too. The final act, where the broadcast tips into chaos, is where enthusiasm cools, with Vulture finding it loses steam and Deadline judging the ending carries excess baggage. The Guardian is cooler than the rest, arguing the film captures the strained feel of studio television without ever becoming disturbing. Sight and Sound goes further, saying the concept is undermined when the film stops obeying its own formal rules. The spread is narrow: ten positive, one mixed, none hostile.

The AV Club
21 March 2024 · A · Matthew Jackson
95

The high-concept horror film succeeds as a forbidden, immersive 1970s nightmare anchored by Dastmalchian’s magnetic performance. Jackson singles out the meticulous production design, sound design, and escalating tension as making it one of the year’s best horror films.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

A found-footage frightener that freshens demonic possession clichés with jet black humour and superb effects in a 1970s chat show setting, briskly entertaining and unnerving.

Read the full review →
Time Out
14 March 2024 · ★★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
80

Praises it as a diabolically brilliant found-footage horror, like Alan Partridge by way of The Exorcist, with clever ideas and creepy atmosphere.

Read the full review →
Total Film
15 March 2024
80*

David Dastmalchian shines in this sophisticated horror movie that stands out for its clever premise and execution.

Read the full review →
Vulture
21 March 2024 · Bilge Ebiri
70*

Dastmalchian delivers a star-making turn as a slick yet uncertain late-night host in this inventive horror film set during a single 1977 broadcast. Ebiri praises the actor’s layered performance and the film’s structural conceit but notes it loses steam in the final act.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
18 March 2024 · ★★★
60

The directors have fun sending up TV conventions as a failing host attempts to revive his career by communing with a demon supposedly possessing a teenage girl. The film capably bottles the strained ersatzness of studio television but does not cut through to anything genuinely disturbing.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Late Night with the Devil worth watching?
Late Night with the Devil is worth watching for anyone who likes horror built on a single set and a slow tightening of the screws, and we scored it 74. The first hour, a 1977 chat show rebuilt down to the ferns and lapels, is as clever as one-room horror gets; the last act abandons the found-footage rule that made it work. Go in for the hour.
How long is Late Night with the Devil, and what is it rated?
Late Night with the Devil runs 1h 33m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a horror film.
Where can I watch Late Night with the Devil in the US?
Late Night with the Devil is streaming on AMC+, Hulu, The Roku Channel, Apple TV, Disney+ and Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $2.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Late Night with the Devil, and is it suitable for children?
Late Night with the Devil is a 15 in the UK and R in the US, and it is not for children. Most of its fear comes from Ingrid Torelli's possessed teenager turning to stare politely into the camera, which unsettled us more than anything explicit; the blood is saved for the last act. Older teenagers who can take a slow build should manage it.
How does Late Night with the Devil compare to Network?
Late Night with the Devil borrows Network's idea that television will air anything that rates, and adds a demon. Sidney Lumet's film is the better made, more fiercely acted and still the sharper satire, though its speeches can crowd out its people; the Cairnes brothers' film is the warmer of the two, plainly fond of the terrible ties and ferns it mocks. Watch Network for the argument and Late Night for the fright.
What should I watch after Late Night with the Devil?
After Late Night with the Devil, try Network (1976, Fi1m 86): Television will put anything on air if it rates; the Cairneses clearly took notes. Then Videodrome (1983, Fi1m 82): Cronenberg’s television signal that gets into your body; grubbier, stranger, and unforgettable.

Cast

Awards

Sitges Film Festival Best Screenplay award, 2023

Won
Sitges Film Festival Best Screenplay award

If you liked this, try…

  1. Ghostwatch (1992) · not reviewed yetThe BBC did the live broadcast from hell first, and did it on a Saturday night.

  2. Network (1976, Fi1m 86)Television will put anything on air if it rates; the Cairneses clearly took notes.

  3. Videodrome (1983, Fi1m 82)Cronenberg’s television signal that gets into your body; grubbier, stranger, and unforgettable.

  4. Lake Mungo (2008) · not reviewed yetAustralian mock-documentary horror that keeps its rules and is quietly devastating.

  5. Noroi: The Curse (2005) · not reviewed yetJapanese found footage that builds its dread slowly and never once shouts.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever