The reviews are close to unanimous. Almost every critic starts with Greta Gerwig’s decision to break Louisa May Alcott’s story out of its chronology and cut between the sisters’ childhood and their adult lives, and most think it works, giving a familiar novel fresh momentum and a sharper eye on money and women’s ambition. The cast draws the other cluster of praise. Florence Pugh’s Amy is the performance named most often; Saoirse Ronan’s Jo and Timothée Chalamet’s Laurie follow close behind.
Where the critics part, it is over the same structure. Den of Geek finds the crosscutting drains momentum across a long runtime and leaves some supporting characters thin, and Slant Magazine thinks the pacing rushes scenes that need air. Screen Daily, one of the two mixed notices, calls the film over-stuffed and rather pleased with itself, while The Skinny finds it occasionally sentimental. These are quibbles inside a narrow spread: there are no negative reviews at all.
L
Little White Lies
25 November 2019 · 4/5/5 · David Jenkins
100
Gerwig delivers one of the great modern literary adaptations, capturing the emotional essence of the March sisters' lives with technical mastery. The critic highlights the film's romantic realism and ensemble performances as a transcendent achievement.
Read the full review →i
The i Paper
24 December 2019 · ★★★★★ · Demetrios Matheou
100
Greta Gerwig’s adaptation is a joyful, moving, near-flawless piece of film-making with an outstanding young cast and a modern sensibility that blows a breeze through the period action. It may be the best of the many adaptations of Alcott’s novel.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
26 November 2019 · ★★★★★ · Joshua Rothkopf
100
Gerwig cuts to the thematic essence of sisterhood, coming of age, nostalgia and female liberty with a fresh visual language. The critic singles out Florence Pugh's standout turn as Amy for particular praise.
Read the full review →E
Empire
25 November 2019 · Helen O'Hara
90*
Gerwig’s follow-up to Lady Bird takes an overly familiar story and makes it immediate, important and daring with bold non-linear storytelling that centres grown women and their ambitions. It is the definitive big-screen Little Women thanks to a finale that would delight Alcott.
Read the full review →I
IndieWire
25 November 2019 · Kate Erbland
90*
The review lauds the film's beautiful performances, impeccable craftsmanship, and Gerwig's ambitious elliptical storytelling that blends tradition with meta modernity. It positions the adaptation as stunning and smart overall.
Read the full review →R
RogerEbert.com
24 December 2019 · Tomris Laffly
90*
The critic praises Gerwig's fresh, non-linear adaptation that respects Alcott while updating it for modern audiences through memory and nostalgia. Strong performances and structural innovation are highlighted as making it a masterly and emotionally resonant film.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
25 November 2019 · David Rooney
90*
Gerwig's take brings freshness, vitality and emotional nuance to the material, shaking up the chronology while respecting its old-fashioned bones and illuminating its proto-feminist perspective. The ensemble shines, led by Ronan's commanding Jo and Chalamet's standout Laurie.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
23 December 2019 · A.O. Scott
90*
The critic hails the film as a major achievement that is generous, sincere, and full of critical intelligence and honest sentiment. Gerwig's inventive adaptation and the dazzling cast, especially Saoirse Ronan, are singled out for praise.
Read the full review →Gerwig's non-chronological structure and elevation of Amy alongside Jo demand viewers reconsider the characters and themes of happiness, economics, and gender expectations. The film treats the sisters as rounded individuals with diverging but equally valid paths, culminating in a satisfying, slyly meta ending.
Read the full review →F
Film Comment
1 December 2019 · Imogen Sara Smith
85*
The critic highlights Gerwig's meta approach that foregrounds Jo's emergence as an author and stiffens the story's feminist elements while remaining faithful to the era. She singles out the multidimensional portrayals of the sisters, particularly Florence Pugh's Amy and the credible Laurie-Amy romance, along with the film's emphasis on economic realities and female bonds.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
25 November 2019 · Kenneth Turan
85*
The critic calls it a splendid version that soars with strong messages and even stronger emotions, highlighting its emotional accessibility, vibrant sisterhood, and Gerwig's nonchronological approach that adds poignancy.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
2 January 2020
85*
Gerwig's restructuring of the novel into layers of memory and nostalgia liberates the story while staying faithful to its progressive themes. The critic singles out Florence Pugh's performance as Amy for particular praise.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
25 December 2019 · Anthony Lane
85*
The review praises Gerwig's raw and startling adaptation for emphasizing women's indignation as a rousing right and for its radical outward gaze balanced with respect for home comforts. It suggests the film may be the best yet made by an American woman.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
20 December 2019 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
80*
Gerwig offers a muscular, moving and often deeply funny reworking of the Louisa May Alcott classic that deconstructs and restructures the tale with meta-twists and a focus on finance as a feminist issue. The film feels like an event whose characters we’ll love for the rest of our lives, despite a few flaws like an invented proposal scene.
Read the full review →T
The Telegraph
27 December 2019 · ★★★★
80
Gerwig's reverent adaptation is lavishly respectable and will please fans, with Chalamet as the standout lively character. Minor complaints include an overbusy score and fluctuating haircuts.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
26 November 2019
80*
Greta Gerwig’s warm, woke take on America’s classic girlhood novel takes liberties but makes a tender, engrossing tale by splitting the sisters’ lives into interwoven timelines that feel fresh and relatable. Florence Pugh’s portrayal of Amy is the film’s star-making turn.
Read the full review →V
Variety
25 November 2019 · Peter Debruge
80*
The review commends Gerwig for a lively, if nonlinear, retelling that does right by the material with a dream cast and shows her aptitude for studio projects. It notes the wholesome, kindhearted tale and strong performances, especially by Ronan and Pugh.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
13 December 2019 · Flora Carr
75*
Gerwig reexamines the love triangle and character dynamics through interwoven timelines, highlighting Amy and Jo as mirrors of each other. The critic notes the film's uncertainty about Jo's ending as a thoughtful ambiguity.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
25 November 2019 · Michael Joshua Rowin
70*
Gerwig’s nonlinear adaptation highlights Jo’s perspective and the sisters’ ambitions but can feel rushed and enervating due to rapid pacing in scenes. It includes a clever meta ending that honors the source while addressing social pressures.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
25 November 2019
60*
Gerwig's film is a conventional yet lavishly nostalgic retelling that plays to a self-selecting audience with strong performances, especially Florence Pugh as Amy. The critic notes its self-satisfied, over-stuffed qualities alongside its appeal.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
29 December 2019 · Wendy Ide
Gerwig delivers a respectful yet bracingly current adaptation that brings the March family to life with overlapping timelines and chaotic energy. The critic praises the focus on female fulfilment, creative ambition and the joyful, tumultuous performances, especially Ronan and Pugh.
Read the full review →T
The Times
26 December 2019 · ★★★★☆ · Kevin Maher
Gerwig's structural audacity and focus on the sisters' relationships make this an instant classic, with standout performances from Ronan and Pugh capturing intense sibling dynamics.
Read the full review →H
HeyUGuys
12 December 2019 · ★★★★★ · Freda Cooper
100
Gerwig blends the classic and contemporary with consummate skill, giving the familiar story a refreshing 21st-century approach while retaining its essence. The non-linear structure, stunning photography, and excellent cast—particularly Ronan as Jo and Pugh as Amy—are singled out for praise.
Read the full review →C
Collider
25 December 2019 · A · Matt Goldberg
95
Gerwig's nonlinear adaptation makes the story more cohesive with powerful character arcs and a youthful, lived-in feel. The critic singles out the terrific performances, especially from Florence Pugh and Timothée Chalamet, and the lush cinematography and score.
Read the full review →P
Paste
13 December 2019 · 9.1/10 · Ellen Johnson
91
Gerwig uses compassionate and unexpected storytelling techniques to renovate the beloved tale, cracking open the narrative structure and toggling between timelines for a rhythmic, vibrant result. The performances, especially Pugh breathing new life into Amy, and the film's emotional resonance are highlighted.
Read the full review →/
/Film
20 December 2019 · 9/10 · Hoai-Tran Bui
90
The critic celebrates the film's warm, big-hearted recontextualization of the story, especially its elevation of Amy as a compelling character. It singles out the vibrant world-building and joyful spirit as standout elements.
Read the full review →P
The Playlist
25 November 2019 · A-
90
The critic praises Gerwig's ambitious non-linear adaptation for its modern take on sisterly bonds and Jo's pursuit of dreams. It singles out the strong performances, especially Ronan's Jo, for making the classic feel fresh and emotionally resonant.
Read the full review →Gerwig puts a new spin on the tale with a non-linear structure and more balanced focus on the sisters, resulting in a moving and meaningful interpretation. The film excels in performances, craftsmanship in scoring and design, and its organic handling of sentimentality and feminist themes without manipulation.
Read the full review →C
Consequence
28 December 2019
85*
Gerwig brings something new to the classic story with a modern edge, structuring it around all the March sisters for added depth and dimension. The joyous reimagining, emotional explosion from loss to love, and standout performances—particularly Pugh's Amy and Chalamet's Laurie—are praised.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
19 December 2019 · Pete Hammond
85*
Gerwig's adaptation affirms the need for a new version by emphasizing Jo's battle for independence and adding layers about money and gender inequality. The film features immaculate casting, strong performances especially from Ronan and Pugh, and excellent production values that make it feel fresh and relevant.
Read the full review →P
Polygon
25 November 2019 · Karen Han
85*
Gerwig treats the four March sisters as equals without judging their different desires and paths. The critic singles out the film's joyful, earnest energy, uniform cast performances (especially Pugh), and emphasis on kindness over conventional success.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
25 November 2019 · ★★★★ · David Crow
80
The critic commends Gerwig for making the story her own by reframing it as a conversation between past and present, honoring Alcott while adding timeliness and insight into Amy and the Laurie-Amy romance. He notes drawbacks including a lengthy runtime where crosscutting disrupts momentum and some supporting characters feel underdeveloped compared to Ronan and Pugh's standout performances.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
8 January 2020 · Anne-Katrin Titze
70*
The critic highlights the film's daring non-linear structure and liberating costumes while noting some scenes feel strained or overly broad. It singles out the strong ensemble, particularly Streep's Aunt March and the focus on the sisters' inner lives.
Read the full review →S
The Skinny
17 December 2019 · ★★★ · Kelli Weston
60
Gerwig’s version centers the sisters’ adult lives, authorship and autonomy with effective flashbacks. The cast’s chemistry elevates this elegant if occasionally sentimental portrayal of family and sisterhood.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate