Critics’ reviews

Magnolia (1999)

20 reviews from 20 publications. Critics’ score 81: 18 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Magnolia

81
Positive
18
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics admire Magnolia: eighteen of twenty reviews are positive and none is hostile. The word that recurs is ambition. Reviewers describe a sprawling ensemble drama of lonely lives in the San Fernando Valley, built in the manner of Robert Altman, and most think the gamble pays off. The acting is the department almost everyone singles out, and Tom Cruise’s misogynist self-help guru is the performance named most often, with John C. Reilly, Melora Walters, Jason Robards and Philip Seymour Hoffman also mentioned. The frog rain is widely read as the film’s daring high point.

The reservations cluster around length and control. Several critics call the three hours exhausting, self-indulgent or repetitive, and a few feel the parts outweigh the whole. The New York Times and The New Yorker are the most doubtful, finding the late reach for larger meaning arbitrary and the sum not quite adding up. The spread is fairly narrow, though: even the mixed reviews recommend the performances.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Jason Caro
100

The critic hails it as a dark, daring and dazzling epic with a superb cast, particularly Tom Cruise, and unpredictable scenarios that command attention despite the indulgent runtime.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
27 November 2008 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The critic praises the film's deep exploration of childhood cruelty's lasting effects and its wise, sympathetic portrayal of flawed characters seeking connection and redemption. He highlights the ensemble performances and the philosophical use of coincidence and the frog-rain sequence as elevating the story beyond melodrama.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
17 March 2020 · Emily Cashen
90*

The critic praises Magnolia as a cathartic masterpiece that explores unresolved trauma and the joys of acceptance and letting go, singling out the climactic frog rain as the most purely cathartic moment in cinema history.

Read the full review →
Total Film
17 March 2000
90*

Magnolia is a compelling, multi-faceted drama that refreshes the ensemble-interconnected-stories format with character revelations, script surprises and strong performances across the board. Tom Cruise delivers a standout electric performance as the misogynistic TJ, making the three-hour runtime worthwhile despite minor sags.

Read the full review →
Variety
9 December 1999 · Emanuel Levy
90*

The critic praises the ambitious scope, grand operatic style, and superlative ensemble that confirm Anderson as one of Hollywood's most audacious filmmakers, highlighting the film's meditation on fate, coincidence, and interconnection.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Leslie Dick
80*

The critic praises the film's ambitious, sprawling structure that interweaves multiple stories and characters across the San Fernando Valley, highlighting its anti-realist elements and strong performances, especially Tom Cruise's. It is seen as a gamble that pays off through its intensity, cinematography, and nerve, despite its length.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 March 2000 · Peter Bradshaw
80*

The critic praises Anderson for establishing himself as one of the most exciting directors with this anthology of broken lives that builds to a spectacular biblical finale. They single out Tom Cruise's standout performance as the misogynist motivational speaker Frank Mackey and the film's dark poetry of regret.

Read the full review →
Time Out
24 December 2014 · GA
75*

The review calls the film over-ambitious, self-indulgent and clumsy yet one of the most enthralling American movies in ages, noting its multi-story structure in the style of Altman films and its dark portrait of loss and fear, culminating in a bold, imaginative deus ex machina.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
70*

The film is a sprawling, Altman-inspired ensemble drama about interconnected characters in Los Angeles dealing with love, death and desperation. It features standout performances, particularly Tom Cruise's career-best turn as a misogynistic seminar leader, along with strong work from John C. Reilly and Melora Walters, though the structure sometimes feels repetitive.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
17 December 1999 · Kenneth Turan
70*

The critic describes it as a frantic, flawed, fascinating film drunk on the joy of making movies, praising its ambition, energy, panache, and fine acting while noting it is not completely successful and can be exhausting.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
17 December 1999 · Janet Maslin
70*

The review finds the film brilliantly orchestrated in its intersecting stories and strong acting, especially Tom Cruise's surprising turn, but criticizes its later descent into arbitrary and desperate attempts at larger meaning, including the frog plague and sing-along. It ultimately calls it too good to miss for its performances and vignettes despite self-destructive tendencies.

Read the full review →
The Times
9 May 2025
70*

The review frames the film as an epic about lost souls in LA, highlighting Tom Cruise's role as a professional pick-up artist whose absurd sexism anticipates later figures like Andrew Tate.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
7 August 2019 · Randall Colburn
60*

Twenty years on, the critic views the film as a sprawling, sloppy, and nakedly emotional project of youthful enthusiasm that is a mixed bag, with parts overwhelming the whole. He praises its well-acted, narratively ambitious qualities and the dynamism that confirmed Anderson's talent after Boogie Nights.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
13 December 1999 · David Denby
60*

The critic calls it a richer but still flawed film filled with startling arias of complaint and emotional breakdowns, praising the fluid camera style, idiosyncratic writing, and standout performances while noting it doesn't fully add up.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
15 October 2014 · A+ · The Playlist Staff
100

Calls Magnolia PTA's best film, a glorious sprawling mosaic of perfect moments and performances that coalesces into sublime philosophical scope with tonal control and compassion.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · ***** · Angus Wolfe Murray
90*

The critic praises Paul Thomas Anderson's ambitious ensemble drama set in the San Fernando Valley for its deep exploration of loneliness, coincidence, and human connection, comparing it favorably to Altman's Short Cuts but noting its darker tone. Exceptional acting, particularly from Jason Robards and Philip Seymour Hoffman, and a superbly constructed script are singled out as highlights.

Read the full review →
/Film
26 December 2019 · Joshua Meyer
90*

Celebrates Magnolia as a young man's ambitious masterpiece of interconnected lives, pure emotion, forgiveness and serendipity, elevated by its ensemble cast, music and willingness to take big swings.

Read the full review →
Paste
28 December 2024 · Jesse Hassenger
85*

Praises Magnolia's youthful, frantic ambition and memorable operatic moments like the deathbed monologue and frog rain, seeing it as a daring, messy epic that captures regret and emotional intensity.

Read the full review →
Collider
24 December 2024 · Elisa Guimarães
80*

Finds Magnolia holds up as a beautiful, earnest tale of loneliness and human connection 25 years later, elevated by standout performances especially Cruise's and a heartbreaking Aimee Mann soundtrack, despite some heavy-handed moments.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
29 September 2025
80*

The critic views Magnolia as one of Anderson’s most dazzling and ambitious films, a character-stuffed epic about fate, secrets, and the San Fernando Valley that stands as a magnum opus in some respects. Tom Cruise’s performance as a self-obsessed self-help guru is singled out for particular praise as one of his greatest, though some subplots like Julianne Moore’s are noted as grating.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate