Critics’ reviews

Man with a Movie Camera (1929)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 86: 12 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Man with a Movie Camera

86
Positive
12
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics come away from Vertov’s film exhilarated, and the praise nearly all lands in one place: the editing. Review after review singles out the speed of the cutting, the double exposures, split screens and trick shots, and the way the film keeps turning round to show the cameraman and the editor at work, so that making the film becomes its subject. Several note that without a plot or intertitles it still holds attention from dusk to dawn across its three cities, and most find its methods as fresh now as anything currently in cinemas.

Reservations are few and mostly sit beside the film rather than on it. Slant Magazine faults a particular Blu-ray transfer, not the film; Eye for Film finds Michael Nyman’s added score occasionally drowns the images; Little White Lies allows that the utopian outlook can look naive. The spread is narrow. The two lower scores belong to reviews whose text is not available, so no specific complaint attaches to them.

Little White Lies
31 July 2015 · 5/5/5 · Trevor Johnston
100

The critic praises its thrilling technical trickery and inventive editing that creates an ecstatically cinematic experience, highlighting its role as a foundation stone for modern cinema and a democratic vision of the medium. He notes its invigorating return to visual language basics despite potential naivety in its utopian outlook.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 July 2009 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The critic praises the film's revolutionary fast-paced montage and self-reflexive structure that makes the act of filmmaking its subject. Vertov's innovative approach to editing and imagery is singled out as still fresh and influential decades later.

Read the full review →
Time Out
27 July 2015 · ★★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
100

The review hails it as a thrilling silent masterpiece that teaches everything about cinema's possibilities through pure movement and visual trickery, noting its political and feminist elements alongside innovative techniques like fast cutting and double exposure. It emphasizes the film's purity and excitement as cinema in its rawest form.

Read the full review →
Empire
28 June 2015 · Ian Freer
90*

Dziga Vertov’s 1929 silent stunner is a love letter to Soviet urban life from dusk to dawn, rendered with every cinematic technique in the book. It is praised as a foundational work of creative documentary and montage.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
30 July 2015 · Nigel Andrews
90*

The critic calls the restored 1929 film a dazzling firework show of symphonic montage across three cities, full of trick effects, multiple exposures and poetic pandemonium that anticipates later cinematic innovations.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
18 February 2021 · Eric Henderson
90*

The critic describes the film as an intoxicating gateway for cinephiles whose innovative editing and self-reflexive structure remain revelatory nearly a century later, while criticizing the specific Blu-ray transfer as inferior to prior restorations.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Keith Phipps
90*

The critic calls the film a hypnotic masterpiece of Soviet avant-garde cinema, praising its daring experimental editing techniques that create a fluid, self-referential structure without plot or intertitles.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
30 July 2015 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic praises Vertov’s experimental silent documentary as a visionary and transformative work that remains dizzying, thrilling and sexy, with punk spirit in its dense ideas and energetic transformation of reality through trick shots and self-reflexive filmmaking.

Read the full review →
The Independent
30 July 2015 · Geoffrey Macnab
75*

The critic finds the film breathtakingly inventive, while noting its eerie moments and unusual erotic undercurrent. The formal playfulness and the pristine restoration with Alloy Orchestra’s new soundtrack stand out.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
6 September 2002
65*

The article text is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. Its specific praise or complaint is likewise unavailable.

Read the full review →
Total Film
30 July 2015
65*

The page identifies this as one of its new-release reviews, but the review text is not available here. Its verdict and specific praise or criticism therefore cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
Paste
9 April 2024 · Alex Lei
90*

The critic hails it as one of the definitive statements on non-fiction filmmaking, still stunning today. They single out its exploration of the mechanical kino-eye revealing the patterns and rhythms of modern industrial life without reliance on intertitles or staging.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
8 September 2002 · Amber Wilkinson
80*

The critic describes Vertov's film as a joyful celebration of post-revolutionary Russian life captured through innovative camerawork and editing that positions the cameraman as documenter, magician and stuntman. The added Michael Nyman score enhances the frantic energy, though it occasionally overpowers the images, while the work's enduring innovation surpasses much contemporary Hollywood output.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
3 May 2016 · ★★★★ · Lewis Porteous
80

Dziga Vertov's uncategorisable masterpiece comes to Blu-ray from Masters of Cinema. Little can be added to the praise heaped upon it over the years, other than to emphasise quite how entertaining it is to even the most casual viewer; when tempos slow down or achieve moments of dizzying catharsis, the effect is utterly disarming.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate