Most critics admire it, and the praise gathers around Lynch’s dream logic and the way the film wears the clothes of a Hollywood noir without behaving like one. Reviewers return to the same qualities: a mystery that resists solving, images that stay with them, and a portrait of the film industry as a dream factory turned sour. Naomi Watts’s double performance draws frequent and specific notice. Several reviews remark on the film’s origins as a rejected television pilot and find the finished feature more coherent than that history suggests.
The reservations cluster at the final stretch. Variety and The AV Club find the closing section a sharp turn into confusion after a controlled first hour, and Time Out feels style wins out over feeling. The one outright dissent, from the Evening Standard, calls the whole thing empty pretension. Otherwise the spread is narrow, and the later reviews, written after rewatches and a restoration, are if anything warmer than the first.
R
RogerEbert.com
12 October 2001 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100
The critic praises Lynch's film as a masterful surrealist dreamscape in the form of a Hollywood noir, where the lack of conventional sense makes it all the more compelling and hypnotic to watch.
Read the full review →T
The Times
7 April 2017 · ★★★★★
100
The critic praises Lynch’s madness-saturated mystery as a gripping, inexplicable experience with double identities and Möbius-strip narrative strands. It notes the film’s origins as a rejected TV pilot extended to feature length and its enduring appeal in a new digital restoration.
Read the full review →E
Empire
4 January 2002 · Simon Braund
90*
Lynch orchestrates a liquid, undulating dreamscape that is beautiful, heartrending, madly confusing and awe-inspiring in its daring and execution. The critic calls it a bona fide masterpiece and an erotic, deeply unsettling journey through the subconscious.
Read the full review →F
Film Comment
1 September 2001 · Amy Taubin
90*
The critic views the film as a radical, formally inventive realization of surrealist theory of film as dream, constructing a bifurcated narrative that transforms meaning through shifting identities and anxiety. It singles out the psychosexual dynamic of the lesbian love story and its portrait of woman as patriarchal pawn within a paranoid vision of the Hollywood industry.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
12 October 2001 · Kenneth Turan
90*
Mulholland Dr. is a mystery that doesn’t want to be solved, a dark dreamscape that needs to be experienced rather than explained. Lynch constructs something that looks like a conventional story but refuses to act in any expected way, creating unforgettable images from a dreamlike world.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
26 September 2001 · Ed Gonzalez
90*
The critic hails the film as a haunting, selfish masterpiece that literalizes surrealism as a perpetual dream state, commending its intricate dream logic and portrayal of Hollywood's dark underbelly.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
6 October 2001 · festival review · Stephen Holden
90*
Lynch has created a nervy full-scale nightmare of Tinseltown that seizes the dream factory cliché and hurls it through the looking glass. The film evolved from a rejected TV pilot into a fascinating example of how a great film can evolve out of adversity.
Read the full review →Lynch subverts the soap-opera glamour of the film industry with nightmare logic and a wonderful cast, holding the manic, psychotic mood right up to the harrowing finale.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
1 January 2002 · Kim Newman
85*
The critic praises the film's disturbing unity despite its origins as a shelved TV pilot and subsequent re-edits into a feature, noting how Lynch probes narrative, performance, and identity through dream-like layers. Naomi Watts delivers a standout dual performance, shifting convincingly from bright aspiring actress Betty to the more damaged Diane.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
1 October 2001 · Anthony Lane
80*
The critic finds the film a lush, confident neo-noir that excels in its sensual, dreamlike exploration of identity, Hollywood dreams turning to nightmares, and erotic tension, with standout moments in the leads' chemistry and Betty's audition scene. Some Hollywood satire elements feel coarser and less effective.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
10 April 2017 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80
The critic finds style dominating over soul in Lynch’s glamorous, slippery Hollywood noir, which gleefully trashes narrative with memorable sensory moments like the Winkie’s creature and Silencio nightclub. While visually stunning and moodily maintained, it lacks the emotional heart of Lynch’s strongest work.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
21 August 2002
75*
Lynch returns to his signature surreal style after The Straight Story. The film is praised as a complex but coherent subversive noir with emotional depth from leads Naomi Watts and Laura Elena Harring, though it may be too weird for some.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
12 October 2001 · Scott Tobias
70*
The critic praises Lynch for salvaging a challenging and seductive narrative from a rejected TV pilot, highlighting the first hour's dream logic and Watts' performance while noting the second half's shift into psychotic excess.
Read the full review →V
Variety
16 May 2001 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
70*
The first three-quarters build compelling suspense, atmosphere, and emotional intensity with strong performances, especially Naomi Watts as Betty, and effective Lynchian dread in its Hollywood setting. The final section shifts abruptly into confusing, mind-twisting territory that risks alienating audiences.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
20*
The film adds up to nothing and creates mystery without explanation; it is surreal pseudery that arrogantly intends to make no sense at all.
Read the full review →R
The Ringer
19 October 2021 · Adam Nayman
90*
The review hails the film as Lynch's crowning achievement and an inexhaustible masterpiece that sums up his obsessions. It singles out Naomi Watts' layered, star-making performance and the film's satirical take on Hollywood as standout elements.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
2 January 2002 · Angus Wolfe Murray
85*
Lynch returns to his signature territory of illusion and unease, where appearances deceive and nothing fits neatly into place. The critic highlights the film's persistent fascination and Lynch's skill in massaging reality out of shape through deliberate dialogue, odd characters, and glitches in the storyline.
Read the full review →C
Consequence
13 October 2021
80*
The critic recalls an early, disorienting college viewing and a recent rewatch, reflecting on the film's fractured structure, dreamlike pliability of reality, and status as Lynch's personal favorite. It praises the neo-noir's confounding yet resonant power two decades on.
Read the full review →H
HeyUGuys
13 April 2017 · Dave Roper
80*
The critic celebrates the film's complex, elliptical structure as a source of particular satisfaction and rewards for the viewer who perseveres. They single out the reality-bending transition involving the blue box for its jarring yet thought-provoking effect on themes of identity and dreams.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate