Critics’ reviews

Naked (1993)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 80: 13 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Naked

80
Positive
13
Mixed
1
Negative
1

With only 5 reviews in so far, most critics respond strongly to Naked’s dark humour, social observation and David Thewlis’s performance as the articulate, repellent Johnny. Praise centres on the complexity of that character and Leigh’s bleak depiction of urban life, though sympathetic reviews note rambling scenes and occasional parody. The spread is wide rather than cautiously favourable: The Independent rejects the protagonist as artificial and finds his nihilism insufficiently challenged, with stereotypical supporting characters and excessive length compounding the problem. The central divide concerns whether the cruelty reveals human complexity or becomes self-indulgence.

The Times
12 November 2021 · ★★★★★ · Kevin Maher
100

This is the greatest David Thewlis performance in one of the greatest Mike Leigh films. Thewlis plays the motormouth conspiracy theorist Johnny who wanders London expounding on his labyrinthine life theories in a series of blistering monologues.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
90*

The critic hails the film as a masterpiece of dark humour and accurate observation, a British counterpart to Bad Lieutenant. He praises David Thewlis's brilliant central performance while noting some rambling scenes.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
16 December 1993 · Kenneth Turan
90*

Turan hails the film as remarkable and unnerving, a daring character study of the vicious yet complex Johnny. He praises Leigh's rehearsal process and the way the film illuminates the intricacies of life through its lead performance.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
6 November 2013 · Mike D'Angelo
90*

The critic highlights the film's status as Leigh's bleakest work, centered on a mesmerizing, logorrheic performance by David Thewlis as the sociopathic yet witty Johnny. Leigh contrasts this character with an even more repulsive figure to underscore themes of emotional violence and stripped humanity.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
15 October 1993 · festival review · Vincent Canby
90*

Canby calls the film a brilliant somersault into dark new territory for Leigh, centered on the caustic, abusive drifter Johnny. He singles out David Thewlis's staggeringly fine performance and the dazzling dialogue for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
25 September 2014 · GA
90*

Leigh's picaresque tale is his most troubling and intriguing work since Meantime, and by far his most cinematic; the outstanding cast, especially David Thewlis's virtuoso performance, gives the film its cruel energy, wit and power.

Read the full review →
Variety
17 May 1993 · festival review
90*

Mike Leigh's film is a major surprise, a Stygian comedy on 90s London social angst that shifts suddenly from comedy to violence and ends in a strangely moving love story. It features a resonant, beautifully modulated script and a tour de force performance from David Thewlis.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
11 July 2011 · Joseph Jon Lanthier
85*

The review presents Naked as a complex humanist polemic set in post-Thatcher London, praising its focus on the mercurial, intellectually barbed Johnny as both repellent and fascinating. It singles out the film's resistance to simple allegory and its vivid portrayal of urban despair and fleeting human connections.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
4 November 1993 · Derek Malcolm
85*

The critic hails Naked as one of the most complex and audacious British films of the early nineties, praising its unflinching portrayal of societal ills through Johnny's story. He singles out David Thewlis's brilliant performance as the anti-hero for particular acclaim, while noting the film's pessimism and occasional parody.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
10 January 1994 · Anthony Lane
70*

Mike Leigh's Naked may be the first British movie in a long while worth paying to see, thanks to David Thewlis's force-of-nature performance as the central figure Johnny. The film has its share of cartoons and flaws but is redeemed by Thewlis's attention and model performance.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 November 1993 · Andy Medhurst
50*

The critic finds the film disturbing and cruel in its depiction of misogyny and male self-loathing, but argues it deserves serious consideration because of Mike Leigh's established talent for nuanced British social comedy.

Read the full review →
The Independent
5 November 1993 · Adam Mars-Jones
30*

The critic finds the film sour and dominated by an artificial, nihilistic protagonist whose worldview goes largely uncontested. He singles out the unconvincing, stereotypical supporting characters and the film's excessive length and self-indulgence for complaint.

Read the full review →
Collider
27 July 2011 · Andre Dellamorte
85*

The critic highlights the lightning-in-a-bottle performance by David Thewlis as the feral, brilliant Johnny and praises the entire cast's depth along with Leigh's stylized direction and sparse lighting that underscore the film's themes of isolation.

Read the full review →
Paste
27 July 2011 · Paste Staff
80*

The review centers on David Thewlis's kinetic, complex performance as the antihero Johnny and commends the raw, anti-Hollywood realism of Leigh's improvisatory approach that makes every moment electrifying despite loose structure.

Read the full review →
Film Stories
23 November 2021 · Rob Daniel
75*

The critic revisits Mike Leigh's divisive 1993 film during a BFI retrospective and 4K re-release, highlighting its shocking tone shift from the director's earlier work and the ferocious star-making turn by David Thewlis as the misanthropic Johnny. They note the film's challenging, horrifying, beautiful, objectionable, funny, exciting and exhausting qualities, along with its renewed relevance to issues like homelessness, misogyny and urban alienation.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate