Critics’ reviews

One False Move (1992)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 82: 8 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of One False Move

82
Positive
8
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics are strongly positive about One False Move, praising a thriller whose suspense grows from complicated people rather than plot mechanics. Praise centres on Carl Franklin’s handling of tension, the screenplay’s attention to character and inequality, and naturalistic performances, with Cynda Williams and Bill Paxton singled out. The reviews repeatedly find that its noir and Western elements leave space for warmth, emotional complexity and an observant account of small-town life.

The spread runs from enthusiastic approval to one mixed assessment, with no outright rejection. The Los Angeles Times admires the suspense but finds the Arkansas sheriff underdeveloped. The Independent offers the broadest reservations, arguing that the violent opening and closing sections sit awkwardly with the rest, the noir props are overdone and the direction is less assured than the writing. Even that review praises the performances and the script’s fresh contrasts between town and country.

RogerEbert.com
8 May 1992 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The critic calls it a great film and one of the best of the year that announces a gifted director. He singles out the way the screenplay and direction make events driven by complex characters rather than plot mechanics.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
90*

The critic calls it a superb modern thriller in the Jim Thompson mould with a trio of criminals converging on a small Arkansas town for a High Noon-style showdown. Subtle asides on racial and sexual inequality, nigh-perfect performances and pacing, and a consistent mood make it one of the finest American movies in recent years.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
17 July 1992 · Janet Maslin
85*

The critic praises the new director for delivering symmetry, surprise and detail that transcend the conventional crime story genre. She singles out the unusual racial makeup of the cast and the film's warmer acting style.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Mark Salisbury
80*

The critic calls it a cracking modern-day Western with neo-noir realism, praising the first-time director's skill at building tension and balancing the cast in a cat-and-mouse game. Highlights include riveting performances, especially Cynda Williams as Fantasia, in an emotionally complex thriller with an upbeat message.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
1 September 1992 · Donald Lyons
80*

The critic savors Carl Franklin's film as a rich new twist on noir. It stands out in the issue's coverage of 1992 releases.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
12 June 1992 · Peter Rainer
70*

The critic finds the film mostly taut and sure-footed as a no-nonsense thriller with effective suspense. He singles out the promising but underdeveloped character of the Arkansas sheriff as a limitation.

Read the full review →
The Independent
8 April 1993
60*

The review notes the film's double-take structure and fresh town-country contrasts in the script by Thornton and Epperson, along with strong performances and an affectionate observation of small-town ways. It criticizes the mismatched violent opening and closing reels, overdone noir props, and less sure-footed direction compared to the writing.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 September 2011 · festival review · Jeff Robson
90*

The critic calls it one of the most perfect examples of film noir for its blend of edge-of-the-seat tension and nuanced human drama, comparing it favorably to classics by Aldrich, Hawks and Huston. They single out the astute, penetrating look at attitudes toward rural America’s black underclass without strident messaging.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
29 August 2010 · Adam Lowes
85*

The critic describes the film as a quietly intense and absorbing character study that has gained deserved praise over time. They single out the strong naturalistic performances, especially Paxton’s lead turn as the small-town sheriff whose cocky demeanor is stripped away.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate