Dracula (Nicolas Cage) stands over seated Renfield (Nicholas Hoult) holding a chalice
Film review

Renfield

2023 · Directed by Chris McKay · 1h 33m · MPA R

In a sentenceNicolas Cage has waited his whole career to play Dracula and the film keeps cutting away to a traffic cop

Renfield (Nicholas Hoult) has spent ninety years fetching victims for Dracula (Nicolas Cage) and is beginning to wonder whether the job is worth it. In present-day New Orleans, while his master recovers from a bad encounter with vampire hunters, he drifts into a support group for people in codependent relationships, where nobody quite believes his story. He eats insects for strength, meets Rebecca (Awkwafina), a traffic cop at war with the Lobo crime family, and starts to imagine a life without a cape in it. Chris McKay directs from a screenplay by Ryan Ridley; Ben Schwartz and Shohreh Aghdashloo play the Lobos. Comedy, horror and a good deal of digital blood. 93 minutes, certificate 15.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Nicolas Cage is a marvellous Dracula, all Lugosi vowels and wounded vanity, and Nicholas Hoult is exactly the put-upon familiar he needs. Around them Chris McKay has built a gory crime comedy that keeps the two of them apart for most of its 93 minutes.

Universal made Dracula in 1931 and has spent most of the years since trying to work out what to do with him. Renfield is the latest answer: give the Count a servant with a grievance, move them both to present-day New Orleans, and treat the whole arrangement as a bad job with a bad boss. Ryan Ridley’s screenplay makes Renfield (Nicholas Hoult) an abused employee who has drifted into a support group for people in codependent relationships, where he is the only member whose partner drinks blood. It is a good idea. The film has about forty minutes of use for it and runs 93.

Nicolas Cage is the reason to see it, and he knows it. He plays Dracula with Bela Lugosi’s vowels and his own wounded vanity, a monster who wants to rule the world and also wants Renfield to tell him he looks well. The film opens in black and white, dropping Cage and Hoult into recreations of the 1931 picture, and we laughed out loud at his first entrance, at the relish of a man who has plainly waited decades for a cape and a coffin. Every scene with Cage in it is alive. There are not enough of them.

Hoult is the right foil. He plays Renfield as a decent man worn smooth by ninety years of fetching dinner, and his apologetic, faintly appalled delivery makes the support group the funniest room in the film after Dracula’s. Brandon Scott Jones runs the group with a therapist’s unbreakable calm and Adrian Martinez, Camille Chen and Bess Rous fill the chairs with people whose troubles are small and real. When master and servant are allowed to argue, the film bites: a squabble over the quality of the last delivery plays like marriage counselling with fangs.

Then the film goes off to arrest people. Awkwafina’s Rebecca is a traffic cop at war with the Lobo crime family, run by Shohreh Aghdashloo’s grand, unhurried matriarch and Ben Schwartz’s idiot heir, and the plot spends a great deal of its short running time on them: corrupt colleagues, a dead father, a stakeout. Awkwafina is game and Aghdashloo enjoys herself. But none of it has anything to do with a man trying to leave Dracula, and the film keeps promising that the two stories will meet and then tying them together with string. Somewhere past the hour we realised we were simply waiting for Cage to come back, and that the film had made us wait.

The other joke is the blood. Renfield eats a bug, gains the strength of ten men and removes limbs as if picking daisies. It is funny twice. Mitchell Amundsen shoots New Orleans in neon pinks and greens and lights the fights brightly enough that the digital gore, which arrives by the gallon, always reads. The film has three credited editors, Zene Baker, Giancarlo Ganziano and Ryan Fosley, and the action shows it: each fight is cut into fragments, and by the third one we could no longer tell who was hitting whom, or care. Marco Beltrami’s score plays it straight, gothic strings under comic business, which is the right choice and one the rest of the film rarely makes. Lisa Lovaas puts Hoult into pastel knitwear as he starts to improve himself, a visual gag the film sensibly does not explain.

Chris McKay’s animated Lego Batman film (2017) knew exactly what it was: a fast, dense parody that never stopped for breath. Here he is directing a workplace comedy, a superhero origin and a crime thriller at once, and giving each the attention of a man with three phones ringing. What We Do in the Shadows (2014) got a whole film out of vampires quarrelling about the washing-up because it trusted the joke. Renfield does not trust anything for longer than a scene.

See it for Cage, who gives a comic performance of real size and precision to a film that treats him as a special effect, and for Hoult, who never lets him take the whole room. Watch it at home, where the stakeout can be skipped. It carries a 15, mostly for the arms.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

61
Positive
11
Mixed
9
Negative
3

Most critics agree on one thing: Nicolas Cage’s Dracula is the reason to watch. The reviews describe his performance as committed, over the top and the liveliest thing on screen, with Hoult’s worn-down Renfield a close second and the pair’s scenes together, framed as a toxic boss and his abused employee, the film’s strongest material. The support-group scenes and some of the more inventive kills also earn praise.

Reservations cluster around everything else. Many find the one-joke premise stretched thin, the Awkwafina crime-family subplot a distraction, and the violence repetitive enough to grow numbing; several say the film loses its way whenever Cage and Hoult are off screen. The spread is wide, from warm approval at NME, Collider and Consequence to outright rejection at Polygon, which alone finds Cage one-note, and from The Times and The Guardian, who call it tiresome and anaemic respectively. The majority settle on entertaining but unfocused.

Empire
31 March 2023 · Kim Newman
75*

Renfield presents Dracula as the worst boss in the world and Renfield as his abused minion in a co-dependent relationship. The film mixes classic horror pastiche, workplace black comedy, and action, with strong performances from Cage, Hoult, and Awkwafina, though pitched more as dark action-comedy than gothic horror.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
11 April 2023 · B- · Jordan Hoffman
70

The film is a small-in-scope but fundamentally entertaining horror-comedy that knows what viewers want and serves it up with gross-outs and gimmicks. It lives or dies by Cage camping it up as Dracula, and he delivers.

Read the full review →
Total Film
12 April 2023
70*

Renfield is not a classic monster movie but offers plenty of eye-bugging moments in a neon-drenched, blood-soaked comedy horror. It is a fun Friday night movie that uses Hoult’s droll delivery, New Orleans locations, and CG blood effects effectively.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
14 April 2023 · Christy Lemire
65*

Nicolas Cage delivers a delightfully over-the-top performance as Dracula, but the film is undermined by bland subplots and underdeveloped supporting characters that stretch a clever concept too thin.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
13 April 2023 · Katie Walsh
60*

Nicolas Cage gives a standout Dracula performance in this goofy self-help-infused vampire comedy, but the flimsy one-joke structure and added crime subplot leave it feeling underdeveloped despite the fun.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
12 April 2023 · ★★★ · Dave Golder
60

The hyperactive horror comedy features gore and gags that splatter the screen but misses as often as it hits. Renfield joins a self-help group and becomes a bug-powered superhero fighting crime, though a better film seems buried inside.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Renfield worth watching?
Renfield is worth watching for Nicolas Cage's Dracula and not much else, and we scored it 58. Cage and Nicholas Hoult are funny together whenever the film lets them share a room, but a crime plot about a traffic cop and the Lobo family keeps them apart for most of its 93 minutes. Watch it at home, where the stakeout can be skipped.
How long is Renfield, and what is it rated?
Renfield runs 1h 33m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a comedy and fantasy film.
Where can I watch Renfield in the US?
Renfield is streaming on Peacock, The Roku Channel and Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Renfield, and is it suitable for children?
Renfield carries a 15 in the UK and an R in the US, and it earns them with gore rather than fear: limbs come off by the gallon in brightly lit, digitally bloody fights played for laughs. It is a comedy first and rarely frightening, but the violence is constant and graphic enough that it is not for children or the squeamish. Teenagers who enjoy cartoonish carnage will be fine.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Dracula (1931, Fi1m 75)Lugosi’s original, and the film Cage is quoting in every syllable.

  2. What We Do in the Shadows (2014) · not reviewed yetFlatmate vampires arguing about chores; the joke Renfield wanted, done properly.

  3. Shadow of the Vampire (2000) · not reviewed yetWillem Dafoe as a vampire hired to play one; the other great comic Count.

  4. The Fearless Vampire Killers (1967) · not reviewed yetPolanski’s snowbound spoof, slower and stranger and much funnier than it sounds.

  5. Thirst (2009) · not reviewed yetPark Chan-wook’s priest turned vampire; codependency played for horror and black laughs.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever