Critics’ reviews

Sleepless in Seattle (1993)

16 reviews from 16 publications. Critics’ score 72: 14 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Sleepless in Seattle

72
Positive
14
Mixed
1
Negative
1
Los Angeles Times
25 June 1993 · Michael Wilmington
90*

The critic deems it a real charmer and romantic comedy that almost makes us forget modern-day cynicism, delivering both romance and comedy through its bicoastal dream-lovers premise. He singles out the sparkling performances of Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan for their simpatico chemistry and ability to shift between poignancy and wisecracks.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Adrian Turner
80

The critic praises it as a gloriously old-fashioned and unashamedly manipulative romantic comedy that works superbly by keeping its stars apart for most of the film, highlighting its box-office success and the effective use of An Affair to Remember as a touchstone.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
25 June 1993 · Roger Ebert
80*

The critic praises the film's unapologetic romanticism and heartfelt sincerity as it follows two people falling in love via radio across the country. He highlights the appealing lead performances by Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan and notes the story's warm, gentle charm despite its contrived elements.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
22 June 2018 · Caroline Siede
80*

The critic praises the film's balance of romance and realism through skeptical leads who gradually connect despite limited shared screen time. Ephron's visual parallels, collaborative direction, and strong supporting cast (especially Hanks with his son) are singled out for making the rom-com feel grounded and timeless.

Read the full review →
Time Out
11 February 2014 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

The critic calls it deeply sentimental and less insightful or funny than When Harry Met Sally, but finds it infuriatingly irresistible thanks to strong performances from Hanks and Ryan, a sparkling supporting cast, and snappy dialogue scenes.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 February 2014 · Peter Bradshaw
75*

The critic praises director and co-writer Nora Ephron for bringing terrific flair, wit and nous to this smart 90s romcom re-release. They highlight the clever reversal of the An Affair to Remember premise and smart humour such as the tiramisu gag.

Read the full review →
Empire
26 January 2006 · Mark Salisbury
70*

A hugely enjoyable romantic comedy that attacks both the funny bone and tear-ducts with equal success. Ephron's script is often uproariously funny with strong support from the cast, though the soundtrack is sometimes too literal.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
12 July 2013 · Tina Hassannia
70*

The review values the film's self-aware take on how media and cultural myths shape ideas of destined love, while affirming its charm as a guilty pleasure. It singles out the exploration of technology's role in idealizing romance and the open-ended Empire State Building finale for its nuance.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
12 July 1993 · Anthony Lane
70*

The review finds the film worth seeing for its stars but notes the leads hardly meet, calling the premise a horribly suitable nineties idea of romantic common sense with safe love. It singles out Tom Hanks as the best reason to see the movie, while observing the story glisten with charm rather than buzz with life.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 June 1993 · Vincent Canby
70*

The critic calls it a feather-light romantic comedy about lovers who meet only in the final reel, a stunt that works far more effectively than expected and shrewdly manipulates emotions for entertaining effect. He singles out the frequent references to the 1957 film 'An Affair to Remember' as an interesting yardstick for the new movie.

Read the full review →
Total Film
10 February 2014 · Emma Morgan
70*

A joyful rebuff to dating myths that has fun with male-female attitudes to romance. Psychotic undertones aside, it celebrates the romcom's charm on its 21st-anniversary reissue.

Read the full review →
Variety
8 June 1993 · Brian Lowry
50*

The review describes the film as purposefully schmaltzy in a manner that's almost cynical, with an inherent appeal in the setup but a leisurely pace that loses momentum before a heart-tugging finale. It singles out the strong performances by Tom Hanks, Meg Ryan, and young Ross Malinger as highlights amid the contrived elements.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
14 February 2014
30*

The critic has never understood the film's appeal. The central pair are irredeemably bland and their cutesy long-distance romance is the perfect cure for insomnia.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
14 February 2014 · Emily Breen
90*

The critic celebrates the film's unabashed romanticism and fairy-tale quality as a welcome contrast to more cynical modern love stories. She singles out its graceful handling of the protagonists' connection through witty dialogue and silence for praise.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
18 April 2022 · Bereznak
85*

The piece ranks the film highly among rom-coms, praising its hopeful storytelling, witty elements, and the way it elevates romantics through coincidence, longing, and a leap of faith. It highlights a specific scene of emotional connection via radio and apple-peeling detail as emblematic of its genius.

Read the full review →
Paste
25 June 2023 · Jesse Hassenger
70*

The critic views the film as an unconventional, chaste, and meta romantic dramedy that ponders romance and movie influences more than delivering sparks or traditional rom-com beats. It singles out the film's self-aware movie references and cultural resonance as a successful yet atypical hit.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate