Critics’ reviews

Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 56: 2 positive, 2 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace

56
Positive
2
Mixed
2
Negative
2

The consensus on The Phantom Menace is mixed, with praise clustering around its visual invention and individual action sequences rather than its storytelling. The pod race and lightsaber duel repeatedly emerge as highlights, while the imagined worlds and cityscapes impress even some disappointed critics. The more enthusiastic reviews find lively family escapism and a recognisable sense of adventure. Several others acknowledge the technical achievement but find little emotional warmth behind it.

Reservations centre on heavy exposition, tangled plotting, stiff performances and digital effects that overwhelm the actors. The spread is wide: The Telegraph celebrates Lucas’s inventiveness and welcomes Jar Jar Binks, while The Guardian finds the film boring, its acting poor and Jar Jar irritating. Even the effects divide opinion, admired for their scope but criticised elsewhere for visual clutter and lack of weight. The central disagreement is how much those spectacles compensate for the weaknesses in character and story.

The Telegraph
15 July 1999 · Andrew O'Hagan
90*

The critic praises the film as one of the most deliriously inventive in years, highlighting George Lucas's genius for adventure narrative and spectacular visual effects. Jar-Jar Binks is singled out as a new star who will soon be as loved as Winnie-the-Pooh.

Read the full review →
Total Film
15 July 1999
75*

The review calls it fantastic fluffy fun-for-all-the-family escapism worth the hype for most viewers, highlighting the pod race, visuals, and action sequences while noting it falls short of being a masterpiece and has flaws in plotting and acting direction.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Colin Kennedy
60*

The critic finds the film undermined by its choice to introduce a young, whiny Anakin Skywalker and excessive exposition, but praises the visual design on Coruscant, the pod race, the lightsaber duel with Duel of the Fates, and Liam Neeson's performance as Qui-Gon.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 July 1999 · Peter Bradshaw
10*

The critic finds the film boring and disappointing, criticizing the uniformly bad acting and irritating characters like Jar Jar Binks. It prioritizes FX and merchandise over any real effort to engage the audience with story or characters.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
18 May 1999 · Kenneth Turan

The prequel is a considerable letdown that is serviceable but noticeably lacking in warmth and humor, and ponderous from a dramatic point of view. Its visual strengths are real and considerable, especially in creating other worlds and cityscapes.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 July 1999 · Andrew O'Hehir

The critic finds the film a lost opportunity with leaden visuals, a tangled story full of expository waffle, offensive stereotypes, and lacking narrative coherence, though praising the battle sequences and lightsaber duel. It suffers by comparison to the original Star Wars.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
5 February 2012 · Calum Marsh

The critic calls the film a cold and lifeless unique disaster overwhelmed by excessive digital effects and visual busyness, with incoherent action and ridiculous elements like Jar Jar Binks that make it an unforgettable awful cash grab.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
10 May 1999 · Frank Scheck

The critic praises the brilliant technical achievement and dazzling special effects in the pod race and lightsaber duel but criticizes the film for lacking emotional resonance, featuring an underdeveloped story focused on merchandising, and relying on silly humor and uncharismatic performances.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
19 May 1999 · Janet Maslin

The film sustains the gee-whiz spirit of the series and offers a swashbuckling extragalactic getaway with plausible illusions and lively space beings. It is a happy surprise that stays busy and viewer-friendly in its exotic settings.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
8 February 2012 · ★★★ · N P
60

The film retains its original faults including a boring pace, first-draft screenplay feel and cartoonish CGI effects that lack weight. It excels in its two standout set pieces, the podrace and the climactic lightsaber duel, along with John Williams' score.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
40*

The critic finds the plot incomprehensible and the dialogue stilted, with live actors overshadowed by excessive CGI effects and creatures. He singles out the visual spectacle and effects work for entertainment value while noting the story fails to engage.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate