Amelia Pembrock (Maggie Grace) stands beside a man in a medical examination room
Film review

The Girl in the River

2026 · Directed by Brando Benetton · 1h 32m

In a sentenceA body in the river and a town that talks about it very slowly

A young woman’s body is pulled from the river that runs through a small town, and the first act introduces everyone who might have put her there. Amelia Pembrock (Maggie Grace) comes back for the funeral and starts asking questions nobody in the town wants asked. Alan Kramer (Devon Sawa), who knew the dead girl, is the man everyone has already made their minds up about. Captain Graysmith (Tiffany Haddish) has the investigation and would prefer Amelia left it to her. Colin Ripley (Ralph Macchio) is polite and says less than he knows, and Arthur and Ilsa Otto (Andrew Stevens and Angelena Swords) are the couple on the edge of it all. Amelia moves between the funeral home, the library, a bar and a dentist she only ever hears down a telephone line.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Brando Benetton’s small-town mystery has a body in the river, a list of suspects and a script that explains each of them three times. Devon Sawa does careful, quiet work in a film that does not deserve him; the rest is waiting.

Brando Benetton writes and directs, and what he wants is plain from the title: a body, a town, a list of suspects worked through one at a time until the truth, as the tagline promises, surfaces. It is the oldest shape a crime story has, and it works when the town feels lived in and the suspects are hiding something worth the trouble. Here it runs 92 minutes, and most of them are spent in rooms where two people tell each other things we already know. The one review we have read so far calls it sluggish. We cannot argue.

Devon Sawa is the reason to keep watching. As Alan Kramer he barely speaks in his first scenes; he stands at the back of the funeral with his hands in his pockets and lets the town look at him, and for a few minutes the film is about something, because we could see a man deciding whether he was going to defend himself. Maggie Grace has the easier job as Amelia and does it well enough, asking her questions with a level, pleasant stubbornness that the script mistakes for a character. When the two of them share a scene the film has a pulse. When they do not, it waits for them to come back.

The trouble is the writing. Benetton’s screenplay gives each suspect a scene that announces what they are hiding, a later scene in which they deny it, and a third in which somebody else reports the denial. Ralph Macchio’s Colin Ripley gets the most of these and plays them with a tight, watchful courtesy that suggests he found more in the part than was on the page. Tiffany Haddish is cast as Captain Graysmith for her warmth and then handed procedure to read out; two or three lines sound like her and the rest sound like a form. Andrew Stevens, who also produces, plays Arthur Otto as a man with a secret, and the film keeps him so far from the centre that we had forgotten him by the time the plot needed him.

David Matthews shoots the town in flat, even daylight, so the river is grey, the streets are grey and the interiors are the colour of a waiting room. There is a case for that in a story about a place that has stopped noticing itself, but it means the water, which ought to be the film’s one image, never becomes one. Julie Toche’s production design gives the library and the bar the same pale wood panelling, and more than once we lost track of which we were in. Zach Prichard cuts each scene a beat after it has finished, on a face holding a thought, and by the hour mark those held faces had become the main event.

Max Aruj and W. F. Smith Leithart’s score is a low string drone that swells whenever someone lies, which is often, so it is nearly always swelling, and it had stopped meaning anything to us before the first act was over. We were bored forty minutes in, and then, because Sawa kept promising a better film in every close-up, we were cross about being bored, which is the worse of the two. The dentist who exists only as a voice on the phone gets one of the few scenes with any tension in it, and it is over inside a minute.

Against the standards of the small-town mystery this is thin. Broadchurch and Mystic River both understood that the crime is the excuse and the town is the subject; here the town is a list of addresses that Amelia visits in order. The comparison already made elsewhere, to a television pilot nobody picked up, is fair, and we would only add that pilots are usually shorter.

Sawa’s admirers, and there are more of them than this film seems to expect, will find him doing quiet, honest work in a picture that has not earned it. Everyone else has a watchable 92 minutes with a phone in one hand, which is not how anyone should be asked to sit through a thriller.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

1 of 6
Positive
0
Mixed
0
Negative
1
The Hollywood Reporter
31 August 2026 · Frank Scheck
20*

Scheck finds the film a sluggish, clichéd thriller that feels like a failed TV pilot. He praises the lead actors’ professional performances, especially Devon Sawa’s haunted physicality and Maggie Grace’s appeal.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Girl in the River worth watching?
The Girl in the River is not worth watching for most people, and we scored it 31. Devon Sawa does quiet, honest work as the suspect the town has already condemned, and his admirers may want to see it for him alone. Everyone else gets 92 minutes of people in grey rooms explaining things they have already explained.
How long is The Girl in the River, and what is it rated?
The Girl in the River runs 1h 32m. It is a crime and thriller film.
Where can I watch The Girl in the River in the US?
The Girl in the River is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $9.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Girl in the River, and is it suitable for children?
The Girl in the River carries no certificate in the UK or the US, so there is no official guide to its content. It is a murder mystery built around a young woman's body pulled from a river, and what follows is almost entirely conversation; we found nothing frightening in it. The likelier problem for children is that it is slow.
How does The Girl in the River compare to Memories of Murder?
The Girl in the River is the weaker film by a long way, and Memories of Murder is the one to choose. Both set a killing in a rural town with a police force that struggles, but Bong Joon Ho makes the town the subject and lets it be funny before it turns dark. Benetton's film treats the town as a list of addresses to visit in order.
What should I watch after The Girl in the River?
After The Girl in the River, try Memories of Murder (2003, Fi1m 91): A rural killing, a hopeless police force and a town that keeps its rain. Then The Vanishing (1988, Fi1m 88): Dutch, cold and patient; the one small-town mystery that trusts you to wait; and Top of the Lake (2013, Fi1m 82): A missing girl, a lake and a detective who belongs to the place she is investigating.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Memories of Murder (2003, Fi1m 91)A rural killing, a hopeless police force and a town that keeps its rain.

  2. The Vanishing (1988, Fi1m 88)Dutch, cold and patient; the one small-town mystery that trusts you to wait.

  3. Top of the Lake (2013, Fi1m 82)A missing girl, a lake and a detective who belongs to the place she is investigating.

  4. The Dry (2020) · not reviewed yetA man comes home for a funeral and the town remembers everything he did.

  5. Prisoners (2013, Fi1m 81)Suburban grief shot in grey, with actors given something to be afraid of.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever