Critics’ reviews

The Great Escape (1963)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 70: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Great Escape

70
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics come down in favour. The reviews return to the same things: Sturges’s patient staging of the tunnelling and the escape plan itself, the size and ease of the ensemble, and Steve McQueen, whose cool sits at the centre of nearly every notice. Elmer Bernstein’s score is picked out more often than any other department, and the motorcycle chase in the last half hour is named as the sequence people remember. Several also credit the film with making a real wartime event approachable for audiences who would otherwise never have met it.

The spread is wide. The commonest reservation is that the film softens the grimmer side of the prisoner-of-war experience in favour of adventure, and a few find it old-fashioned even for its time. The New York Times, reviewing on release, calls it artificial and mechanical, its men made up rather than lived. The Evening Standard admires the scale but prefers smaller British escape films such as The Colditz Story.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Andrew Collins
100

This is one of the all-time great war movies, celebrating the indomitable spirit of Allied POWs through an intricate escape plan. Sturges excels at detailed staging and ensemble casting, with McQueen's supercool performance and Bernstein's score standing out.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
4 August 1996 · Glenn Lovell
90*

The critic highlights the restored widescreen Panavision presentation of the 1963 POW classic and praises its large-scale action sequences and emotional depth, noting why director Sturges considered it one of his best efforts.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1962 · Variety Staff
80*

The critic praises the film for entertaining, captivating, thrilling and stirring the audience through its depiction of a bold POW escape plot, highlighting strong performances especially by Steve McQueen and Richard Attenborough, and Elmer Bernstein's score.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Bob McCabe
70*

The film humanises a significant WWII event and introduces generations to war through its story of the mass POW escape. It singles out Steve McQueen's iconic motorcycle jump and Elmer Bernstein's defiant score for praise.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
21 May 2013 · Chris Cabin
70*

The critic praises Sturges's focus on the prisoners' collaborative tunnel-building effort and international teamwork as a metaphor for filmmaking, while noting that the film soft-pedals the grim realities of the POW experience.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
18 May 2004 · Scott Tobias
70*

The critic calls the film a workmanlike adventure epic that excels in its authentic heist-like breakout sequences and lighthearted diversions but struggles with the grim historical outcome, crediting McQueen's motorcycle scenes for providing a rousing close.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
17 August 1963 · Jonathan Miller
70*

The critic finds the film harmlessly entertaining, appreciating the ingenuity of the escape efforts and the male camaraderie among the prisoners, with good boisterous performances by Steve McQueen and James Garner, while noting its nostalgic, miniature charade quality.

Read the full review →
Time Out
11 September 2012 · CPe
65*

The film is an uneven but entertaining WWII escape drama that felt old-fashioned even on release. It features memorable sequences, a strong cast led by Steve McQueen as the Cooler King, and an iconic motorcycle stunt in the final half hour.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
50*

The American-scale production is impressive with its ensemble and McQueen's cool persona and stunts, but the critic prefers more intimate escape stories like The Colditz Story. It notes the film's fictionalised, propaganda-tinged portrayal of likeable Germans.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
8 August 1963
30*

The critic finds the film artificial and mechanical, with make-believe men and an overly romanticized, arrogant portrayal of defiance in the POW camp that relies on clichéd Hollywood tricks rather than real human involvement.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate