Capt. Marko Ramius (Sean Connery) stands in the submarine control room
Film review

The Hunt for Red October

1990 · Directed by John McTiernan · 2h 15m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceA submarine, an international crisis and a welcome number of people who seem qualified to be at work

Sean Connery plays Captain Marko Ramius, a Soviet submarine commander whose actions bring the United States and Soviet Union into an international crisis. Alec Baldwin is Jack Ryan, trying to understand the captain’s intentions as the rival powers consider their responses. Scott Glenn plays Commander Bart Mancuso of the USS Dallas, with Sam Neill as Captain Vasily Borodin and James Earl Jones as Vice Admiral James Greer. Adapted from Tom Clancy’s novel, the story follows a contest of military judgement in which neither side can afford to misread the other.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

John McTiernan makes a patient, absorbing submarine thriller out of people trying to understand one another under pressure. Sean Connery and Alec Baldwin make the thinking compelling; the explanations and thin character writing occasionally test our patience.

The Hunt for Red October trusts us to find a military problem interesting before anyone starts solving it by force. John McTiernan makes that trust worthwhile: this is a tense, satisfying thriller, held back a little by its appetite for explanation. A Soviet submarine commander has provoked an international crisis, and understanding what he wants becomes urgent work. Sean Connery’s Ramius is a useful man to put at the centre of such a story. Connery can make other people seem rash simply by taking his time.

Alec Baldwin’s Jack Ryan gives the film someone whose thinking we want to follow. Baldwin makes intelligence convincing: his assurance feels worked for, and he leaves enough uncertainty in it to keep the problem alive. We were gripped by his attempts to make sense of Ramius, because Baldwin makes getting the interpretation right feel as urgent as any physical feat. McTiernan lets that performance carry stretches another thriller might fill with movement.

Jan de Bont’s cinematography makes the submarine interiors feel confined without making the people difficult to follow. Terence Marsh’s production design is convincing as a place where trained crews work, and never becomes the main attraction. We can attend to faces and decisions instead of admiring the equipment. The surroundings persuade us that these people belong here, which matters in a film so dependent on our belief in their professional judgement.

Editors John Wright and Dennis Virkler keep the competing groups and decisions legible, even when the screenplay supplies more information than the moment needs. We can follow the pressure being passed from one person to another without having to stop and reconstruct the plot. Basil Poledouris’s music gives the military drama weight, though its solemnity occasionally presses harder than the performances need. The tension is often strongest when the film gives someone time to listen and decide.

The supporting cast helps sustain that feeling of people being paid to do difficult jobs. Scott Glenn’s Commander Bart Mancuso and James Earl Jones’s Vice Admiral James Greer have an authority that does not need much underlining, while Sam Neill’s Vasily Borodin brings welcome warmth. Yet Larry Ferguson and Donald E. Stewart’s screenplay struggles when it tries to give these men lives beyond their duties. Those passages can feel dutiful, and some of the sentiment arrives without enough preparation.

The adaptation of Tom Clancy’s novel also retains more explanation than a 135-minute film needs. There are stretches when Ferguson and Stewart seem determined to leave no possible misunderstanding uncorrected, and McTiernan indulges them for too long. Even these actors cannot keep every explanation equally interesting. A shorter film would sacrifice some technical detail and gain some urgency, particularly where the dialogue repeats what the performances have already made clear.

Submarine thrillers have cramped quarters to help them create tension, and McTiernan makes equally good use of the people giving the orders. The pleasure lies in following skilled men as they make consequential choices with incomplete knowledge. Their private lives may be thinly written, but the work holds our attention. Give it an evening without interruptions; these people have enough misunderstandings to manage already.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

71
Positive
10
Mixed
0
Negative
2

Most critics take to this as a sturdy, intelligent submarine thriller that keeps a complicated plot clear. The praise gathers around John McTiernan’s direction: his taut set pieces, his patient crosscutting between the Soviet boat and American intelligence, and the spatial clarity that lets a talky story move like an action film. Sean Connery’s commanding Soviet captain is the performance singled out most often, with Alec Baldwin’s nervier Jack Ryan close behind, and several admire its handling of the language barrier between crews.

The dissent is small but sharp, and the spread is wide: ten warm reviews, none lukewarm, two cold. Time Out finds the attempts to give the characters lives beyond the plot perfunctory. The New York Times calls it unconvincing and lazy, with punches pulled and effects that fall short, while Empire says the handling of Russian dialogue and heavy exposition sink the first ninety minutes before the action arrives. Later reassessments run warmer than the original notices.

Variety
31 December 1989 · Variety Staff
90*

The film is a terrific adventure yarn, thoughtfully adapted from the novel to reflect mellowing US-Soviet relations, with splendid performances from Connery and Baldwin and strong special effects.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
2 March 1990 · Roger Ebert
85*

Ebert praises the film as a skillful and efficient thriller that keeps its complex plot clear while highlighting the intelligence of its characters and strategy. He singles out the strong performances, particularly Sean Connery as Ramius and Alec Baldwin as Ryan, along with the film's focus on clever deception over crude motivations.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

This submarine drama is an engaging thriller in which a Soviet commander sparks an international crisis. John McTiernan's no-frills direction maintains high tension throughout, aided by a strong supporting cast.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
29 May 2003 · Nick Schager
80*

The critic calls the film a thrilling edge-of-your-seat trifle that has admirably withstood the test of time. They single out director John McTiernan's knack for taut set pieces and the credible performances, particularly Alec Baldwin's as Jack Ryan.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
6 July 2023 · Tom Fordy
75*

The critic describes the film as sturdy and immersive, praising director John McTiernan for handling it like a thunderous action film despite its talky nature. They highlight Sean Connery's commanding performance as the standout element.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
2 March 1990 · Sheila Benson
70*

The underwater thriller has an amiable smartness, a crackerjack premise, and a satisfying upbeat message, with strong performances especially from Connery and effective production values.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Hunt for Red October worth watching?
The Hunt for Red October is worth watching for anyone who enjoys a thriller built on people thinking under pressure, and we scored it 82. Sean Connery and Alec Baldwin make the contest of judgement absorbing, and John McTiernan keeps it tense without much violence. The screenplay explains more than it needs to, and the men's private lives are thinly written.
How long is The Hunt for Red October, and what is it rated?
The Hunt for Red October runs 2h 15m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is an action and thriller film.
Where can I watch The Hunt for Red October in the US?
The Hunt for Red October is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does The Hunt for Red October compare to Das Boot?
The Hunt for Red October is the more comfortable film, while Das Boot is the harsher and more physically gruelling account of submarine life. McTiernan's thriller takes pleasure in skilled men whose expertise usually protects them; Petersen's drama shows how little protection expertise can offer. We rate both highly, but the earlier film is the one that leaves a mark.
Is The Hunt for Red October based on a true story or a book?
The Hunt for Red October is adapted from Tom Clancy's novel of the same name and is not a true story. The adaptation keeps a good deal of the book's technical explanation, more than the film needs, and the review notes that the characters' lives beyond their duties are thinly drawn. You do not need to have read Clancy to follow the film.
What should I watch after The Hunt for Red October?
After The Hunt for Red October, try Das Boot (1981, Fi1m 89): For a harsher account of submarine life, where expertise offers limited protection. Then The Wages of Fear (1953, Fi1m 90): Another tense study of men whose practical skills are tested under pressure; and Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy (2011, Fi1m 84): For more patient intelligence work, with every conversation requiring close attention.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1991

Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Sound
Won
Best Sound Editing

If you liked this, try…

  1. Crimson Tide (1995) · not reviewed yetAnother submarine command dispute, with less room for patience and compromise.

  2. Das Boot (1981, Fi1m 89)For a harsher account of submarine life, where expertise offers limited protection.

  3. Fail Safe (1964) · not reviewed yetMilitary procedure turns frightening as capable people confront the limits of control.

  4. The Wages of Fear (1953, Fi1m 90)Another tense study of men whose practical skills are tested under pressure.

  5. Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy (2011, Fi1m 84)For more patient intelligence work, with every conversation requiring close attention.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever