Critics’ reviews

The Iron Giant (1999)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 84: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Iron Giant

84
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The consensus is warmly positive, with praise clustering around the friendship between the boy and the robot, the retro animation and the film’s pacifism. Most critics find the humour and sentiment well judged, with enough narrative confidence to carry serious ideas without turning the story into a lecture. The 1950s setting also earns attention: Cold War fears and atomic paranoia give the adventure substance, while the giant’s gentle character keeps it accessible to children.

The reviews differ more in emphasis than in judgement, and there is no substantial negative dissent in the supplied responses. Some concentrate on the action, visual wit and emotional force; others foreground the challenge to conformity and reliance on weapons. The New York Times offers a modest qualification, suggesting that the messages about nonconformity and the dangers of weapons may resonate more with adults.

The Guardian
17 December 1999 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic calls it the best animation of the year and the best family movie for Christmas, describing it as a little gem with tremendous sweetness and narrative confidence, like an apocalyptic ET or pre-teen Terminator 2.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
85*

A delightful surprise and refreshing animated feature with an unfashionable commitment to pacifism. The critic singles out the sophisticated 1950s depiction, including atomic paranoia and the giant's fully realised character as a lovable old-fashioned robot who does not want to be a weapon.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

The critic hails it as a first-class achievement in cartoon virtuosity that borrows from 1950s comic art and sci-fi to stunning effect. They single out its blend of political allegory for adults with dazzling visuals and excitement for children.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
20 December 2010 · Joseph Jon Lanthier
80*

The critic describes the film as an Americana fairy tale with emotional intelligence, praising its subtle moral themes, visual wit, and the giant's struggle for agency against its destructive programming.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
2 April 2009 · Scott Tobias
80*

The critic highlights the film's singular, personal vision as a cult favorite that rejects typical animated formulas, praising its retro style, earnest take on 1950s America, and the bond between the boy and the pacifist robot.

Read the full review →
Total Film
17 December 1999
80*

A touching and hilarious film that delivers laughs, tears and food for thought in a picture aimed at kids. The critic singles out the effective mix of knowing humour, well-paced action, retro animation (with the giant as the only CG element) and a dramatic finale.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
4 August 1999 · Kenneth Turan

The critic calls the film straight-arrow yet subversive, blending old-fashioned 2D animation with computer effects to create a warm, timeless tale of a boy and his robotic friend that feels like a classic. Its dry humor, anti-establishment tone, and gentle lessons against guns and nuclear weapons are singled out for praise alongside its heartfelt simplicity.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
6 August 1999 · Roger Ebert

The critic praises the film as an enchanting animated feature with an E.T.-like story about a boy befriending a giant robot from space, noting its charm and underlying Cold War parable about choice and self-determination. The simple, story-driven approach without musical numbers or cute animals, along with its visual style reminiscent of Japanese animation, is highlighted positively.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Leslie Felperin

The critic calls it one of the more emotionally satisfying films of the year and a welcome non-Disney animated success. They praise the skillful mix of humour and sentiment that delivers its moral message without preachiness.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
21 July 1999 · David Hunter

The critic calls the film outstanding and a giant leap for Warner Bros. animation, praising the wonderful central character of the Iron Giant and the sense of joy in scenes between Hogarth and the robot.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 August 1999 · Lawrence Van Gelder

The review describes the film as a polished animated work that re-examines 1950s Cold War fears through a modern lens, turning sci-fi tropes upside down to critique conformity, paranoia, and military dependence. It notes the story of a boy befriending the robot and the messages about nonconformity and the perils of weapons, which may resonate more with adults.

Read the full review →
Time Out
13 March 2014 · WH

The review describes the film as entertaining and intelligent, a delightful animation that effectively dramatises the conflict between imaginative solutions and forceful ones. It notes the moral elements while keeping it suitable for younger audiences.

Read the full review →
Collider
12 September 2015 · A+ · Matt Goldberg
100

The critic finds the film a timeless classic that continues to resonate with its blend of humor, heart, and anti-war message. The animation, humor, and 1950s sci-fi affection are singled out for praise, along with the emotional impact of the Giant's sacrifice.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
15 February 2011

The critic calls The Iron Giant one of the very best animated films of its generation and an exceptional, special film that has aged brilliantly. They single out its tight, fat-free storytelling, character focus, and refusal to rely on sugary Hollywood tropes for praise.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
17 May 2015 · Sam Ashurst

The critic praises The Iron Giant as a vivid, funny, and emotionally rich animated classic with wonderful characters and heart. They single out its combination of comedy, detail, and emotional depth (comparing it favorably to the best Pixar output) for praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate