Critics’ reviews

The Room (2003)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 63: 4 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Room

63
Positive
4
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics agree The Room is a terrible film and that this is beside the point. Nearly every review treats Tommy Wiseau’s drama as a midnight-screening ritual rather than a story, and the praise clusters around the audience: the thrown spoons and the shared pleasure of watching something fail so completely. Several find in Wiseau’s fixations, the pillow fights and the repeated Golden Gate Bridge shots, something raw and personal that makes it stranger than the usual bad film.

The reservations are about whether any of that amounts to a reason to watch. Variety, reviewing on release before the cult formed, finds it simply unpleasant and expects walkouts before the halfway point. Paste, writing two decades on, accepts the appeal but argues the so-bad-it’s-good mode has run its course. The spread is wide, from outright dismissal to something close to affection, and the score in the middle reflects a film critics enjoy describing more than they defend.

Evening Standard
10 February 2017 · Tim Cooper
80*

The piece portrays The Room as a staggeringly bad film that has become a cult phenomenon enjoyed through audience participation at screenings. The critic singles out the interactive experience and Tommy Wiseau's enigmatic presence for enjoyment.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
26 March 2009 · Scott Tobias
80*

The critic celebrates The Room as a worthy successor to Rocky Horror in the midnight movie tradition, highlighting its uniquely amateurish and revealing ineptitude that has spawned audience rituals like throwing spoons. He singles out Wiseau's nakedly personal pain and odd personal fetishes, such as repeated Golden Gate Bridge shots and pillow fights, as what makes the film stranger and more compelling than a typical bad movie.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
4 December 2017 · Richard Brody
80*

The critic argues that The Room is a more compelling and deeper work than The Disaster Artist, praising its raw, unfiltered expression of the director's personality and worldview despite (or because of) its technical and narrative flaws.

Read the full review →
The Independent
20 July 2009 · Tim Walker
60*

The critic describes The Room as incoherently scripted, appallingly acted and unintelligibly edited, yet notes that it makes audiences happy in its awfulness. He singles out its cult following and audience participation at screenings for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
18 July 2003 · Scott Foundas
10*

The film is extremely unpleasant and prompts most viewers to ask for their money back well before the halfway point. It singles out the ludicrous attempt to portray the freakish Wiseau character as a normal everyday guy, along with the soft-core sex scenes.

Read the full review →
Collider
27 June 2023 · Ross Bonaime
75*

The critic views The Room as both one of the worst films ever made and a masterpiece, crediting its singular, idiosyncratic vision by Wiseau that defies conventional criticism. He singles out the way audience participation and reinterpretation have transformed it into a unique communal experience that transcends the director's original dramatic intent.

Read the full review →
Paste
27 June 2023 · Rory Doherty
60*

The critic examines The Room's enduring cult status as the quintessential so-bad-it's-good film but argues it is time to move on from that mode of appreciation, noting its scattershot structure and unintentional comedy as the source of its appeal. He singles out the self-serious dramatic intent clashing with the results as what makes it uniquely fascinating yet ultimately limiting for cult cinema discourse.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate