Critics’ reviews

Thelma & Louise (1991)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 71: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Thelma & Louise

71
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to Thelma & Louise, with praise clustering around Davis and Sarandon’s performances and their convincing friendship. Scott’s direction also earns broad approval for its energy, humour and use of the desert landscapes, giving the road film both scale and room for intimate exchanges. The more enthusiastic reviews find Khouri’s screenplay sharp and funny, and see the women’s command of a traditionally masculine genre as a source of both entertainment and provocation.

The spread is wide, however, particularly over the film’s politics and characterisation. Several critics find the men stereotyped and the women’s psychological development too thin to support the screenplay’s ambitions. Time Out admires the direction and acting but questions how much the role reversals achieve. Sight and Sound reads a covertly repressive morality tale beneath the apparent liberation, while Slant regards the social commentary as simplistic despite the strong performances and visuals.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

Callie Khouri’s script puts women in the driving seat for the first time in this hugely entertaining and controversial road movie, sparking debate about liberated equality versus defeminisation. The film provokes indignation and fulfills its duty to entertain and provoke.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
2 March 2011 · A- · Keith Phipps
90

The film retains its power as a gripping buddy movie and landmark with strong female protagonists. It blends entertainment with a subversive statement on women's freedom and systemic issues.

Read the full review →
Empire
27 January 2006 · Angie Errigo
75*

The film is a genuine must-see for its smart script, bravura performances and epic visuals, even if it falls short of full-blown masterpiece status. The critic singles out the visual sensation created by the desolate landscapes as a mythic backdrop for the women's odyssey.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CM
60*

Scott directs with blistering energy and the leads plus Keitel are acutely convincing, but the script is simplistic in reducing men to stereotypes and the women gain strength mainly through gun laws rather than self-knowledge. The film relies too much on knee-jerk role reversals in a male genre.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 July 1991 · Janet Abrams
50*

The critic views the film as a remarkably conventional morality tale about sex, drink, rock and roads, with an ambivalent and covertly repressive attitude toward women who take control of their lives. Performances by Davis and Sarandon are praised despite thin characters, along with one visually poetic sequence in the Painted Desert.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
20 February 2003 · Nick Schager
30*

The one-sided portrayal of men as uniformly oppressive makes the feminist message feel simplistic and overkill despite strong performances and visuals. The crime-spree narrative poses as profound social commentary but comes across as a run-of-the-mill tale.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
24 May 1991 · Kenneth Turan

The critic calls it a provocative, poignant, and funny neo-feminist road movie that empowers its heroines and subverts masculine genre conventions with grace and authenticity in dialogue and performances.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
11 July 1991 · Tim Pulleine

The critic praises the film's technical accomplishment, opulent production values, and strong performances but criticizes the screenplay's lack of psychological depth, which makes the apocalyptic ending feel fabricated rather than inevitable. Overall, sheer command lifts it above the commercial norm.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
27 May 1991 · Terrence Rafferty

The review praises the film’s casual, exhilarating moments and the intuitive chemistry between the leads, while noting its lyrical, jokey take on personal freedom and the heroines’ journey.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
24 May 1991 · Janet Maslin

The critic finds the film a fresh and exuberant reimagining of the buddy-road movie genre, with strong performances from Sarandon and Davis and unexpected comedic and visual flair from director Scott.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1990 · Variety Staff

The review highlights the film’s adventurous road-pic energy, comedy, momentum, and dazzling visuals, noting the leads’ contrasting styles and its ultimate theme of freedom rather than gender conflict.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
6 March 2012 · ★★★★½ · Dave Roper
90

The critic praises the film as top-drawer filmmaking that holds up well decades later as a road movie, crime caper, and tract for female empowerment. He singles out the strong performances by Davis and Sarandon, Scott's direction, the screenplay, and the beautiful cinematography.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 March 2009 · Jeff Robson
85*

The critic rates the film highly as a terrific ensemble piece, sharp study of friendship, and effective road movie/buddy film that still sparks debate. He singles out Khouri’s sharp script, Scott’s handling of both grand and intimate moments, the gorgeous desertscapes, and the excellent lead performances by Sarandon and Davis.

Read the full review →
Collider
7 March 2011 · Scott Wampler

The film delivers solid performances from Davis and Sarandon, strong direction from Scott, and an iconic, ballsy ending, but overall feels like an above-average revenge/road movie with not enough going on to strongly recommend beyond fans or completists.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate