Critics’ reviews

Truly Madly Deeply (1991)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 68: 4 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Truly Madly Deeply

68
Positive
4
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to this intimate treatment of grief and a lover’s ghostly return, with praise clustering around Juliet Stevenson and Alan Rickman. Stevenson’s portrayal of bereavement gives the film much of its emotional credibility, while the leads’ performances help Anthony Minghella move between distress and comedy. The favourable reviews also value his dialogue and humane direction, finding wit and emotional honesty in a premise frequently compared with Ghost.

The spread is wide, and the disagreement centres on whether the supernatural humour sustains or weakens the treatment of loss. Empire admires the performances but finds that the ghosts undermine the seriousness. Time Out considers the bereavement metaphor overstretched and the tone cloying, despite the actors’ efforts. The New York Times is the clearest dissenter, finding the material sugary and smug rather than enchanting. Even the less enthusiastic reviews generally acknowledge the strength of the acting.

The New Yorker
29 April 1991 · Terrence Rafferty
85*

The critic calls it a lovely, original comedy and the work of a mature artist with a fresh and startlingly humane vision, praising Minghella's direction, dialogue, and the remarkable performances by Stevenson and Rickman.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Sue Heal
80

Dubbed the British Ghost, this romantic drama is a far more witty and incisive affair distinguished by glorious performances from Alan Rickman and Juliet Stevenson. Its strengths include emotional integrity throughout and Anthony Minghella's skill at blending pathos with well-aimed humour.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1990
80*

The review praises the sharply scripted study as an impressive directorial debut, noting fine ensemble playing and strong performances especially by Stevenson, while acknowledging surface similarities to Ghost but a different feel and theme.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
24 May 1991 · Roger Ebert
75*

The critic finds the film an odd but moving take on ghosts returning from the afterlife, praising the convincing early scenes of grief and reunion as well as the strong performances by Stevenson and Rickman. He notes it leads to some profound truths about choosing between worlds.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
60*

The film is a BBC-funded mood piece about a woman's reaction to her lover's death and his ghostly return, more intimate than blockbuster fare like Ghost. It shifts from honest grief to humor, with strong performances from Stevenson and Rickman, though the ghosts undermine its serious intent.

Read the full review →
Time Out
22 July 2015 · TCh
55*

The BBC's sweet, feminine answer to Ghost focuses on Juliet Stevenson's emotional turmoil after her lover's death, with Alan Rickman returning as a chauvinistic ghost. The bereavement metaphor is over-extended and Minghella tends to cloy, but Stevenson's performance nearly succeeds and Rickman's apparition provides fun moments.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 May 1991
40*

The review compares the film unfavorably to Ghost and finds it should be enchanting but ultimately isn't, criticizing the gooey and smug material despite good actors who work hard on it.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate