Critics’ reviews

Videodrome (1983)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 84: 12 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Videodrome

84
Positive
12
Mixed
0
Negative
0
RogerEbert.com
2 February 2023 · Walter Chaw
95*

The critic calls the film a masterpiece and a prophetic sociological provocation that has lost none of its power. He singles out its prescient exploration of how unregulated media and technology mutate human perception and behavior.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2015 · Adam Smith
90*

The critic highlights Videodrome as a landmark of body horror that Cronenberg invented and made his own, with its unique fleshy surrealism, hallucinations, and mutations stemming from a sinister TV signal. It notes the film's perfect timing with 1980s anxieties around television, video, and censorship, calling Cronenberg the single most important director working in horror.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
13 September 2004 · Scott Tobias
90*

Highlights the film's prescience in imagining virtual reality and the merging of technology with the body, calling it more relevant than ever. Singles out Cronenberg's unique integration of the creepy and cerebral, with James Woods' performance and the dense mysteries as strengths.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
27 June 2017 · Adam Woodward
85*

Cronenberg’s erotically-charged social satire is a cautionary tale for the internet age that feels more relevant than ever. It explores humanity’s masochistic tendencies toward technology and media through visceral body horror and prescient themes of screens, violence and dehumanisation.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

One of Cronenberg’s most personal, complex and disturbing films exploring technology fusing with the human body, voyeurism and the links between sex and violence. The startling imagery and James Woods’s fierce performance make for a deeply unsettling experience despite a plot that unravels.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
9 October 2023 · Chris Cabin
70*

Praises the film's forward-looking intelligence and prescient exploration of technology, media, sex, violence, and the body despite some narrative incoherence. Singles out the Criterion 4K restoration for its superior image quality that brings the visceral effects and themes to life anew.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 November 2000
70*

The critic notes Cronenberg's interest in technology and physiology merging into new eroticism. While some visual effects are eccentric rather than scary and literal, the film stands out for its originality and wit compared to similar works.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 February 1983 · Janet Maslin
70*

The critic finds the film clever and inventive in its satirical take on media exploitation, with strong special effects and a futuristic feel. She notes that it eventually grows grotesque and a little confused, though it sustains its cleverness for a long while.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
16 December 2011 · ★★★★★ · Alan Bett
100

The critic calls it an unsettling masterwork that delivers horrific mind mutilation beyond body horror, tackling TV's influence in a way relevant to the digital age.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
20 October 2015 · A · The Playlist Staff
95

The critic praises Videodrome as the most Cronenbergian of Cronenberg's films, highlighting its perfect encapsulation of themes like body vs. mind and the seductive power of technology. It balances body horror with chilly cerebrality in a prescient yet period-specific way, calling it terrific.

Read the full review →
Collider
4 February 2023 · A- · Marco Vito Oddo
90

The critic praises its visionary exploration of how media shapes perception and reality, noting its continued relevance decades later. It also highlights the enduring power of its practical body horror effects.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
3 December 2012 · Ryan Lambie
90*

The critic praises Videodrome as Cronenberg's richest and most audacious film, highlighting its exploration of violent imagery's effects and memorable practical effects. It notes the film's enduring relevance and James Woods' strong performance.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate