Art (Mike Faist), Tashi (Zendaya) and Patrick (Josh O'Connor) sitting together on a bed
Film review

Challengers

2024 · Directed by Luca Guadagnino · 2h 12m · MPA R

In a sentenceThirteen years of foreplay between two men, refereed by a woman who just wants to see some good tennis

Tashi Donaldson (Zendaya) was a junior star whose own playing career ended early. Now she coaches her husband Art (Mike Faist), a champion whose form has gone. To get it back she enters him in a small event in New Rochelle, where the final puts him across the net from Patrick Zweig (Josh O’Connor), once his doubles partner and closest friend, now broke and sleeping in his car. Luca Guadagnino’s film, written by Justin Kuritzkes, cuts between that match and the thirteen years before it, back to the night two teenage boys met a girl at a tournament and both wanted her. It runs 132 minutes and carries a 15 certificate.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Luca Guadagnino’s tennis love triangle is quick, funny and sharply acted by Zendaya, Mike Faist and Josh O’Connor. The score never stops shouting and the last stretch is more style than tennis, but we enjoyed ourselves.

Luca Guadagnino’s Challengers is a love triangle told as a tennis match. Justin Kuritzkes’s script begins at the final of a small event in New Rochelle, with Art Donaldson (Mike Faist), a fading champion, on one side of the net and Patrick Zweig (Josh O’Connor), his former best friend, on the other. Art’s wife and coach Tashi (Zendaya) sits in the stands. Then the film goes back thirteen years to when all three were teenagers, and for the rest of its 132 minutes editor Marco Costa cuts between the match and the past, the years stamped on the screen. It is quick, funny and well acted, and we recommend it, with one complaint about volume that we will come to.

The three leads are doing different things and all of them work. Zendaya plays Tashi with her arms folded and her jaw set; she watches tennis the way other people watch money, and when she talks about it she is the only person in the film who is not flirting. Faist makes Art decent, anxious and always half a step behind, a man who has won a great deal and does not seem to have enjoyed any of it. O’Connor plays Patrick as someone who has never once been embarrassed, and the film gets most of its laughs from sitting him next to people who are embarrassed on his behalf. An early scene in a hotel room, two boys on a bed either side of a girl who is working out what to do with them, is the best-written thing here. We laughed, and then the scene went quiet, and so did we.

Sayombhu Mukdeeprom shoots the court in hard daylight so every serve throws off sweat, and Guadagnino puts the camera where a camera cannot go: under the court looking up through the surface, or travelling with the ball across the net. It is showing off and we knew it, and we still sat forward. We were exhilarated and a little embarrassed to be. Jonathan Anderson dresses the three in tennis whites and hoodies, plus one T-shirt with a slogan across the chest that the film treats as a plot point, which is a good joke and a fair one. Merissa Lombardo’s production design keeps the New Rochelle event looking as small as it is, so when the film jumps to a stadium in Atlanta in 2019, with Chris Fowler and Mary Joe Fernández on commentary, the drop in Art’s fortunes is plain without a line of dialogue.

Then there is the music. Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross have written a techno score that thumps at the pace of a rally, and in the matches it is exactly right. The trouble is it does not stop there. It plays over conversations in cars and hotel rooms, and there are conversations here we would have liked to hear. Some of the reviews so far have complained about this and they are right.

The last stretch of the match is where the film gets loudest and loses us. Slow motion, the score at full volume, bodies against the sky, and the tennis stops being tennis. By the third slow-motion serve we were counting the minutes we had left. The thirteen-year structure has a cost too: the same grudge gets explained more than once, from a slightly different angle, and one explanation would have done. Tashi’s life outside the two men is thin. Nada Despotovich, as her mother, has a scene or two, and A.J. Lister, as Lily, hardly registers.

Guadagnino has made sadder films than this and better ones. Call Me by Your Name had a summer and a long goodbye; this has a scoreboard. It is also the funniest thing he has made, and the most sure of what its actors can do. He has decided that the tennis is the sex and the sex is the tennis, and for most of two hours he makes that hold.

Watch it with someone who will argue afterwards about which of the three they would have picked. We changed our minds twice before the car park.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

81
Positive
19
Mixed
1
Negative
1

The reviews are largely agreed, and agreed loudly. Most critics find Challengers Luca Guadagnino’s most purely entertaining film, and the praise settles on the same three things: the central trio, the tennis, and the sex, or the promise of it. Zendaya is named most often, usually as the film’s engine, with Josh O’Connor a close second and Mike Faist rarely far behind; several reviews say the chemistry among them carries the picture. The tennis sequences are singled out for inventive camerawork that keeps the matches tense even for viewers who do not care about the sport.

The Reznor and Ross techno score divides opinion: many call it thrilling, while the Evening Standard and Deadline find it intrusive. Deadline also objects to choppy time jumps, and The Ringer thinks the energy is all on the surface. The spread is narrow apart from one outlier: Eye for Film, filing months later, finds the film dragged out and thin on character.

Little White Lies
12 April 2024 · 4/5/5 · Hannah Strong
100

The review calls the film a fun, smart and sexy character study powered by strong performances and playful direction. It singles out Josh O’Connor’s charismatic turn as a standout alongside the film’s sharp dialogue and energetic style.

Read the full review →
The Times
12 April 2024 · Kevin Maher
90*

Guadagnino, O'Connor and Zendaya deliver the greatest tennis movie in history with terrific performances and a sexy masterclass in tension. The critic praises the faultless central trio and the director at the top of his game.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
12 April 2024
85*

The critic calls it Guadagnino’s most purely entertaining film, a scintillating mix of romantic triangle and gripping sports drama with playful showmanship. Zendaya is praised as superb and commanding, with the dynamic tennis sequences and score singled out for their intensity and wit.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
12 April 2024 · David Rooney
85*

The critic finds the film smart, seductive, and one of Guadagnino’s most pleasurable and playful works, with strong chemistry among the leads driving the love-triangle story intertwined with tennis competition.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
23 April 2024 · Justin Chang
85*

The critic calls the movie irrepressibly entertaining and exuberantly lusty, an amped-up story of a three-way romantic rally in the tennis world. He praises its free-floating horndoggery and stylish rebuke to puritanical mainstream cinema.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
26 April 2024
85*

Guadagnino's tennis love triangle is the most purely pleasurable film of the year with sleek bodies, minds and racquet-twanging steaminess. The critic singles out the chemistry and tense tennis sequences for praise.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Challengers worth watching?
Challengers is worth watching, and we scored it 80. Luca Guadagnino's tennis love triangle is quick, funny and sharply acted by Zendaya, Mike Faist and Josh O'Connor, cut between one small final and the thirteen years behind it. Our reservations are a techno score that plays over conversations we wanted to hear, and a last stretch that is more slow motion than tennis.
How long is Challengers, and what is it rated?
Challengers runs 2h 12m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a drama and romance film.
Where can I watch Challengers in the US?
Challengers is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Challengers, and is it suitable for children?
Challengers carries a 15 certificate in the UK and an R in the US, and it is neither violent nor frightening. It is a sexually frank drama about three adults and their teenage selves, with the film treating the tennis as the sex and the sex as the tennis. It is not for children; older teenagers and adults are its audience.
How does Challengers compare to Y Tu Mamá También?
Challengers and Y Tu Mamá También both put two boys and a woman in a triangle where the friendship is the real love story, but they are different in kind. Cuarón's road film is sadder and more humane, and Maribel Verdú's older woman sees through the boys in a way Zendaya's Tashi, who watches tennis the way others watch money, never needs to. Guadagnino's is the funnier and louder film; Cuarón's is the one that stays with you.
What should I watch after Challengers?
After Challengers, try Jules et Jim (1962, Fi1m 88): The original two-men-one-woman film, and still the saddest and the lightest on its feet. Then Y Tu Mamá También (2001, Fi1m 87): Two boys, an older woman and a road trip; the friendship is the real love story; and Bull Durham (1988, Fi1m 83): Baseball rather than tennis, but the same idea: the woman in the stands runs the game.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Jules et Jim (1962, Fi1m 88)The original two-men-one-woman film, and still the saddest and the lightest on its feet.

  2. Y Tu Mamá También (2001, Fi1m 87)Two boys, an older woman and a road trip; the friendship is the real love story.

  3. Match Point (2005) · not reviewed yetA tennis coach marries up in London and desire wrecks the arrangement; colder than Guadagnino.

  4. Bull Durham (1988, Fi1m 83)Baseball rather than tennis, but the same idea: the woman in the stands runs the game.

  5. Borg vs McEnroe (2017) · not reviewed yetOne final, two temperaments, and the sport taken entirely seriously for a change.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever