A blonde woman in a white dress sits with a man in formal attire
Film review

Disraeli

1929 · Directed by Alfred Edward Green · 1h 30m

In a sentenceBritain buys a canal and nobody leaves the drawing room

Victorian London. Benjamin Disraeli (George Arliss), Prime Minister, wants to buy the Suez Canal for Britain before Russia can reach Egypt first, and the Bank of England, under its governor Lord Michael Probert (David Torrence), will not lend him the money. At home in Downing Street his wife, Lady Mary Beaconsfield (Florence Arliss), keeps him fed and steady. In society, Mrs. Agatha Travers (Doris Lloyd) listens closely to every word said about Egypt and passes it to Count Borsinov (Michael Visaroff). Disraeli takes on the idle young Lord Charles Deeford (Anthony Bushell) as a secretary, partly to make him worth the attention of Lady Clarissa Pevensey (Joan Bennett), and turns to the banker Sir Hugh Myers (Ivan Simpson) for the money the Bank has refused.

Fi1m review

George Arliss had played Disraeli for years before the microphones arrived, and it shows: every pause is placed. The film around him is a photographed play, stiff in the legs and thin in its subplots, and worth an evening only if the performance is what you have come for.

Disraeli is a Warner Bros. talkie from 1929, made by people who knew the technology was the attraction and the star was the insurance. George Arliss had played Benjamin Disraeli on stage and in silent film before this version, and Julien Josephson’s script, adapted from the stage play, hands him the part again with the furniture barely moved. The story is the purchase of the Suez Canal: Disraeli wants it, Russia wants Egypt, the Bank of England says no, and a pair of Russian agents drift through London society taking notes. Alfred Edward Green directs, and his main job is to keep Arliss in frame and audible.

Our view is that it is a decent film with one reason to watch it. That reason is very good. The rest is a museum, and we mean that as a description, not an insult; you can learn a great deal here about what British history looked like to Hollywood the year sound arrived, and about how a stage actor learned to talk to a microphone.

Arliss is the whole show. He plays Disraeli as a man who has decided that being amused is a form of power: the head tilts, the eyes half close, a hand comes up and waits, and the line arrives a beat after everyone around him expects it. The epigrams are stagey and he knows they are, so he underplays them, letting the other actors do the reacting. In the scenes where he talks a reluctant man round, at the Bank, or across his own desk, we found ourselves leaning in, which is not something we expected from a 90-minute film in which almost nobody stands up.

Almost nobody stands up because the camera cannot follow them. Lee Garmes shoots the interiors handsomely, with lamplight on faces and the dark corners of Downing Street left dark, but the frame is fixed for most of the film and people arrange themselves in front of it as they would on a stage. Owen Marks cuts only when somebody enters or leaves, so scenes run to their natural length and then a little past it. David Mendoza and Louis Silvers supply music at the front and back and largely stay out of the dialogue, which was the habit of the year and suits a film that lives on talk. Earl Luick’s costumes do their work quietly: frock coats, silk, and for Disraeli the famous curl on the forehead and the ring on the finger, which Arliss uses as a prop more than once.

What does not work is everything that is not Disraeli. The young lovers are the problem the play had and the film keeps. Anthony Bushell’s Lord Charles Deeford is a handsome blank who is told to become useful and does so off screen, and Joan Bennett’s Lady Clarissa Pevensey has little to do but wait for him in a good dress. Their scenes together stopped the film dead for us, and we were bored, and then faintly irritated that a 90-minute picture had found room for them. The spy plot is better served. Doris Lloyd gives Mrs. Agatha Travers a soft social manner that makes her eavesdropping believable, and Michael Visaroff’s Count Borsinov is enjoyably certain of himself. Neither of them is a threat for long, which the film does not seem to mind.

The scenes that moved us are the domestic ones. Lady Mary Beaconsfield is played by Florence Arliss, who was married to the star, and the two of them have the ease of people who have shared a breakfast table for decades. A late passage between them, which we will not describe, is played almost without gesture, and it is the one place the film stops performing. Margaret Mann is billed as Queen Victoria, and we will leave her appearance where the film puts it.

Against the standard of 1929, when many talkies were static and most were worse acted than this, Disraeli is a respectable piece of work. Against the standard of what a film about a clever politician can be, it is a recital. Watch it at home, in one sitting, and treat it as what it is: a record of a great stage performance caught just as the medium learned to record voices. If you want the Suez Canal, read a book. If you want Arliss, this is where he is.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

2 of 6
Positive
2
Mixed
0
Negative
0
The New Yorker
5 October 1929 · John C. Mosher
85*

The critic calls 'Disraeli' the standout film of the week, commending how George Arliss's star performance translates fully to the screen with clear voice and delightful gestures, describing it as a first-rate gentle caricature with elegance. The adaptation stays faithful to the play's focus on the Suez Canal story without unnecessary exotic digressions.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 October 1929
80*

The critic praises George Arliss's masterful and vigorous performance as Disraeli in this Vitaphone adaptation of the play, noting his familiarity with the role from stage and prior silent film versions. Director Alfred Green's use of sound and camera is highlighted as effective, with the film's epigrams and tonal quality adding to its appeal.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Disraeli worth watching?
Disraeli is worth watching if George Arliss is what you have come for, and we scored it 68. His performance as the Prime Minister buying the Suez Canal is placed to the pause and worth leaning in for; the film around him is a photographed play with a fixed camera and a dull young romance. Treat it as a record of a stage performance, not a history lesson.
How long is Disraeli, and what is it rated?
Disraeli runs 1h 30m. It is a drama and history film.
Where can I watch Disraeli in the US?
Disraeli is streaming on Tubi in the US. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Disraeli compare to The House of Rothschild?
Disraeli is the stiffer of the two, and The House of Rothschild the one that moves. Both are stagey Arliss vehicles with romances that stop them dead, but the later film has more life in its legs, while the earlier one has him alone as its reason to watch. Pick Disraeli for the purer performance, Rothschild for something closer to a film.
What should I watch after Disraeli?
After Disraeli, try The House of Rothschild (1934, Fi1m 70): Arliss again, as a banker this time, in a film that moves more than this one. Then The Madness of King George (1994, Fi1m 83): Another statesman piece from a play, with Nigel Hawthorne doing the heavy lifting; and Lincoln (2012, Fi1m 82): A leader gets a bill through by cunning and patience, in rooms lit like this one.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1930

Won
Best Actor

If you liked this, try…

  1. The House of Rothschild (1934, Fi1m 70)Arliss again, as a banker this time, in a film that moves more than this one.

  2. The Private Life of Henry VIII (1933) · not reviewed yetCharles Laughton eats a chicken and a monarchy; the British answer to the history vehicle.

  3. The Madness of King George (1994, Fi1m 83)Another statesman piece from a play, with Nigel Hawthorne doing the heavy lifting.

  4. Danton (1983) · not reviewed yetDepardieu and Wajda make a political argument feel like a fight; talk with stakes.

  5. Lincoln (2012, Fi1m 82)A leader gets a bill through by cunning and patience, in rooms lit like this one.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever