A woman playing piano as family gathers around in a living room
Film review

Fjord

2026 · Directed by Cristian Mungiu · 2h 26m · MPA R

In a sentenceThe water is beautiful, the light is beautiful, and everyone is quietly writing everyone else up

Mihai Gheorghiu (Sebastian Stan), a devout Romanian, lives with his wife Lisbet (Renate Reinsve) and their children Elia (Vanessa Ceban) and Emmanuel (Jonathan Ciprian Breazu) in a village on a Norwegian fjord. The family is evangelical and strict, and it keeps to itself. When a report of corporal punishment reaches the child protection service, officials come to the house with notebooks and questions, and the Gheorghius find themselves under investigation. Mihai will not apologise for his faith or for how he runs his household. Lisbet has to decide how far she stands beside him. The people around them, Mia Halberg (Lisa Carlehed) among them, are asked what they have seen, and with Attorney Jacobsen (Christian Rubeck) the family takes the matter into a courtroom, where the argument becomes one about Norway as much as about two children.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Cristian Mungiu sets a devout Romanian father against the Norwegian child protection service and declines to say who is right. It is superbly acted and patiently built, and at 146 minutes its even-handedness starts to look like stalling.

Cristian Mungiu has spent twenty years filming Romanians in small rooms with an institution leaning on them: the hotel in 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days (2007), the village meeting in R.M.N. (2022). Fjord takes the method to Norway. Mihai Gheorghiu (Sebastian Stan) is a devout Romanian father in a fjord-side village whose strict household comes to the attention of the child protection service over corporal punishment, and then to a courtroom. Mungiu wants us to change sides, and for an hour we did. Then the film keeps changing our minds for another hour and a half, and we began to suspect it did not have one of its own. It is good, it is long, and it is careful in a way that finally costs it.

The acting is the reason to go. Stan plays Mihai without any of the usual signals for a screen zealot. He does not shout, he does not stare, he says please. The certainty does the frightening, not the voice. Renate Reinsve, as his wife Lisbet, has the harder job, a woman who loves the man and is watching what his convictions cost, and she plays most of it in the pause before she answers a question. Both work in three languages and neither seems to be acting the language. Lisa Carlehed, as Mia Halberg, is the Norwegian the film allows to be unsure, and hers is the face we kept looking for.

Tudor Vladimir Panduru shoots the way Mungiu has always liked to be shot: the camera set down in a room and left there while a conversation runs its full length, so nobody gets a close-up to win the argument with. Outdoors the water and the rock fill the frame and the people are small in front of them, which is the point. Marius Winje Brustad and Simona Pădurețu give the Gheorghius a warm, cluttered house and the state a set of pale, tidy offices, and the contrast does a good deal of the arguing. Kirsi Gum dresses the family plainly, buttoned to the neck. Kaspar Kaae’s music is scarce and better for it. Mircea Olteanu cuts seldom, and each cut carries weight.

Here is what we felt. In the first hour we were frightened, and not by anything violent. Two officials sit at a kitchen table with notebooks, and Reinsve’s face slowly registers that everything said in this room will be read later by someone who was not in it. Mungiu does the ordinary room in which a life is being decided better than anyone working, and this is one of his best. By the second hour the fear had turned into something less useful. Every scene sets one side’s reasonable case beside the other’s and ends with the scales level, and we noticed we had stopped feeling and started keeping count.

The trial scenes are the strongest writing in it, dry, procedural and properly tense, with Christian Rubeck’s Attorney Jacobsen arguing a case the film only half believes. Around them are strands involving the village that the film picks up, sets down and picks up again, and each time it does the central family cools a little. At 146 minutes, there was room to lose some of it.

Most critics have taken the even-handedness as the achievement, and a few have complained that it tips towards the Norwegians, or towards the Romanians. Mungiu would probably take both complaints as proof he got it right. We are less sure. A film can decline to judge because it has looked hard and found the question honestly difficult, or because judging would be rude, and by the end Fjord is closer to the second. The Norwegians, Carlehed apart, are given less inner life than the Romanians, so the film leans one way while telling us it does not.

Beyond the Hills (2012) took one moral problem and followed it to the end. Fjord has three languages, several families and a national argument to referee, and it referees rather than plays. See it for Stan and Reinsve, for the kitchen table and for the courtroom, and bring someone you disagree with. It carries a 15 certificate and will fill the evening and a fair part of the drive home.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

65
Positive
13
Mixed
3
Negative
2

Most critics come out in favour of Fjord, though few come out in raptures. Thirteen of the eighteen reviews are positive, and the praise settles on two things: Sebastian Stan as the devout Romanian father, a performance several reviewers call his most ambitious and restrained, and Cristian Mungiu’s refusal to take sides in the fight between a strict religious family and Norway’s child protection system. Renate Reinsve is admired alongside him, and the long takes, sharp dialogue and trial scenes are singled out as the film at its most gripping.

The reservations cluster around distance. Several reviews find the film cooler and less affecting than Mungiu’s earlier work, one notes the 146-minute runtime drags under its subplots, and Time Out thinks both sides are overdrawn. The spread is wide. The Guardian finds it underpowered and anticlimactic, Screen Daily calls it bloodless despite the performances, and Sight and Sound feels the antagonists are flattened into villains.

Radio Times
19 May 2026 · ★★★★
80

Mungiu delivers a knotty, complex moral tale and first-rate engrossing drama with sharp dialogue, long takes and riveting trial scenes that position it as a Cannes highlight.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
22 May 2026 · festival review · Mark Asch
70*

Mungiu uses the story of a strict evangelical Romanian-Norwegian family facing child services intervention to explore cultural mistranslation and intolerance toward conservative values in progressive Scandinavia. The film indicts a form of elite liberal bias without offering easy judgments.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
18 May 2026 · festival review · David Ehrlich
70*

The review presents the film as a gripping culture war drama about religious parents accused of child abuse in a tale of cultural assimilation and clashes between progressive and traditional values. Mungiu is noted for crafting a cautionary story that examines these tensions through the family's ordeal.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
18 May 2026 · festival review · David Rooney
70*

The critic finds the film a compellingly squirm-inducing drama that scrutinizes Norway’s child protection system and cultural clashes, though it falls short of Mungiu’s best work. Stan's performance as the strict father is particularly praised for its nuance and restraint.

Read the full review →
The Times
22 May 2026 · ★★★★☆ · Ed Potton
70*

The film explores cultural, religious and progressive frictions in a scenic Norwegian setting with a clear-eyed, unjudgmental approach to issues like court politicisation and religion in parenting. It lacks the emotional impact of Mungiu's earlier work but offers sharper understanding of both sides by the end, with a revelatory performance from Sebastian Stan.

Read the full review →
Variety
18 May 2026 · festival review · Guy Lodge
70*

The critic praises the film's ambitious ambiguity and riveting portrayal of cultural clashes and family drama in a Norwegian setting involving child welfare issues, highlighting the strong ensemble acting and intricate narrative that avoids easy resolutions.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Fjord worth watching?
Fjord is worth watching for Sebastian Stan and Renate Reinsve, and for its first hour, though we scored it 66 because its even-handedness turns into stalling over 146 minutes. Cristian Mungiu sets a devout Romanian father against Norway's child protection service and declines to say who is right. See it if you like patient, argument-driven drama and have a long evening to give it.
How long is Fjord, and what is it rated?
Fjord runs 2h 26m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a drama film.
Where can I watch Fjord in the US?
Fjord is not on any streaming or rental service in the US at the moment. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Fjord, and is it suitable for children?
Fjord carries a 15 certificate in the UK and an R in the US, and it is not for children, though what frightens is a kitchen table with two officials and notebooks, not anything violent on screen. The subject is corporal punishment inside a strict religious household, argued through an investigation and a courtroom. Teenagers used to slow, talky drama could manage it; the squeamish have little to fear.
How does Fjord compare to Beyond the Hills?
Beyond the Hills is the better film, because it takes one moral problem and follows it to the end, where Fjord has three languages, several families and a national argument to referee, and referees rather than plays. Both are Mungiu at his patient, unflinching best in the early stretches. Choose Beyond the Hills for a story that finishes its thought, and Fjord for two performances and a courtroom worth the wait.
What should I watch after Fjord?
After Fjord, try Beyond the Hills (2012, Fi1m 82): Mungiu in a Romanian convent, one moral problem, followed to the end without flinching. Then The Hunt (2012, Fi1m 82): Mads Mikkelsen accused in a Danish village that has already decided; the mirror image of this; and A Separation (2011, Fi1m 93): Farhadi’s Tehran divorce, where everyone is telling the truth and nobody is right.

Cast

Awards

Cannes Film Festival, 2026

Won
Palme d'Or

If you liked this, try…

  1. Beyond the Hills (2012, Fi1m 82)Mungiu in a Romanian convent, one moral problem, followed to the end without flinching.

  2. The Hunt (2012, Fi1m 82)Mads Mikkelsen accused in a Danish village that has already decided; the mirror image of this.

  3. A Separation (2011, Fi1m 93)Farhadi’s Tehran divorce, where everyone is telling the truth and nobody is right.

  4. Saint Omer (2022) · not reviewed yetA French courtroom, a mother on trial, and a film that watches rather than rules.

  5. Custody (2017) · not reviewed yetLegrand’s French custody battle; the family court as a horror film, and rightly so.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever