The Ice Cream Man (Ari Millen) pushes his cart among excited children
Film review

Ice Cream Man

2026 · Directed by Eli Roth · 1h 26m · MPA NR

In a sentenceEli Roth gives the children the knives, then can think of nothing for them to do but the same thing again

An ice cream van pulls into a quiet suburb in high summer, driven by a smiling man in white (Ari Millen) who calls himself Jonathan Smiley and hands out treats to anyone small enough to want one. The neighbourhood children, among them Jared (Charlie Zeltzer), Benji (Kole Parks), Tommy (Shiloh O’Reilly), Mia (Kiori Mirza Waldman) and Lizzie (Sarah Abbott), queue up. Whatever is in the mix turns them, one at a time, against every adult on the street, and the parents, Alison (Karen Cliche) and Marty (Eli Roth) among them, find their own kitchens turned into slaughterhouses. A local priest (Benjamin Byron Davis) knows something of who Smiley is and where he came from. Eli Roth directs from a script he wrote with Noah Belson; it runs 86 minutes and carries an 18 certificate.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Eli Roth’s killer-kids horror has one idea, an ice cream van whose treats turn a suburb’s children on their parents, and spends 86 minutes repeating it. The practical gore is committed; the script and the jokes are not, and most critics are right about it.

Eli Roth has made a film about an ice cream man whose treats turn a street’s children into murderers, and he has made it in 86 minutes with an 18 certificate, which tells you most of what he intends. The script, by Roth and Noah Belson, is a comic strip: the van arrives, the children eat, the adults die, and the panel repeats. There is a good, nasty little idea in there, the one thing every parent hands a child without thinking used as the weapon. The film has it for about twenty minutes and then does nothing with it but the same thing again. It is poor, and most critics have said so, and we agree with them.

The ice cream man himself is the best thing here. Ari Millen plays Jonathan Smiley with a fixed grin and a voice pitched somewhere between a children’s presenter and a dentist, and he never raises it, which is the right choice in a film where everyone else is shouting. Jenifur Jarvis puts him in the white uniform and cap you would expect, and the more blood lands on it the more wrong he looks. We were unnerved by him early, before anyone had died, in a scene where he simply waits at the kerb with the engine running. Then the film gives him almost nothing else to do.

The killings are practical, which we will count in the film’s favour. Latex tears, blood pumps, and a great deal of it ends up on the kitchen floor. The children, Jared (Charlie Zeltzer), Benji (Kole Parks), Tommy (Shiloh O’Reilly), Mia (Kiori Mirza Waldman) and Lizzie (Sarah Abbott), go at the adults with whatever is to hand, and the first time it happens we laughed, out loud, at a child’s complete lack of hesitation. By the fourth we had stopped laughing and started checking the time, because every kill is the same shape: a grown-up turns round, a small figure is behind them, something sharp, cut. Matt Lyon edits each one to the same beat, and the beat never varies. Brandon Roberts’s score keeps signalling a decade the film would rather have been made in.

Simon Shohet shoots it on digital, flat and bright, so the suburb looks like a suburb at three in the afternoon and never like anywhere a horror film would want to be. Peter Mihaichuk’s van is the one designed object with any character; the houses around it are just houses. The jokes, and there are many, are the kind that announce themselves a line early, and the actors deliver them as if they had been told the audience would be laughing already. Roth casts himself as Marty, one of the adults, and plays him with a grin that suggests he is having a better time than we are. Karen Cliche, as Alison, is the only grown-up playing the fear straight, and she is right to.

Benjamin Byron Davis’s priest carries the backstory, delivered in a few speeches that explain where Smiley comes from and why. It is the sort of explanation that makes a monster smaller, and the film would be better without it. We will say nothing about where the story goes, except that the last stretch turns meaner than anything before it, and the meanness does not read as a point.

Roth’s Cabin Fever (2002) and Hostel (2005) were unpleasant with some conviction, and Thanksgiving (2023) showed he could still stage a set piece with a beginning and an end. This is a step down from all three. It has the gore of those films without their patience, and it treats its audience as people who will sit through anything so long as somebody is bleeding.

Anyone who buys a ticket for the practical effects will get what they paid for, and roughly nothing else. The rest of us were bored by the halfway mark of a film that is not long enough to be boring, which takes some doing.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

35
Positive
0
Mixed
3
Negative
10

The reviews are almost uniformly unimpressed: no critic recommends Eli Roth’s killer-kids horror, and most dismiss it outright. Where praise exists, it goes to the effects department. Several critics credit the practical gore, with The Hollywood Reporter calling the prosthetics designers the film’s real stars, and a few concede the premise of an ice-cream man whose treats turn children on adults has some promise.

The complaints cluster around script and tone. Critics find the story thin, the jokey violence leaden and the kills repetitive after the first shock; almost nobody finds it frightening. Several measure it against smarter recent horror and Roth’s own Thanksgiving and find it wanting. The spread runs from a grudging C at The AV Club, which calls it a determinedly feel-bad film, down to The Guardian, which sees a cheap-looking, lazy picture with contempt for genre fans. The most generous verdict is that gorehounds may enjoy it and nobody else will.

The AV Club
3 August 2026 · C · Jarrod Jones
57

Roth's silliest and bleakest work to date, a repetitive survival yarn delivering cheap splatter thrills via practical effects but lacking inventive escalation and ending on an aggressively sour note. It serves as a determinedly feel-bad movie with a viscous aftertaste.

Read the full review →
Time Out
5 August 2026 · Simon Crook
45*

Roth returns to shock bait in a killer-kids horror but plays the splatter for laughs that quickly wear thin. Gorehounds will enjoy the practical effects, but the uncertain tone and lack of fear leave it with a numbing brain-freeze.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
7 August 2026 · Robert Abele
40*

The critic finds the film a gory but empty splatterfest lacking narrative depth or scares, with Roth delivering jokey violence over substance. They single out the concept's potential undermined by trivial execution compared to smarter horror like 'Weapons.'

Read the full review →
Radio Times
6 August 2026 · ★★ · Alan Jones
40

Gore galore but little more in this cheap, clunky chiller that mistakes endless bloodletting for entertainment. The jokey humour is leaden and the film lacks substance compared to better entries in the psycho-kids sub-genre.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
3 August 2026 · Kim Newman
40*

Roth unleashes possessed children on adults in an extravagantly violent but narratively insubstantial horror flick inspired by EC comics. The film is childish and steeped in 1980s tropes, lacking the edge of predecessors.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
3 August 2026 · Frank Scheck
30*

The film is an ultra-gonzo horror flick whose real stars are the prosthetics designers delivering relentless practical gore effects of children turning into homicidal killers. It is catnip for gorehounds but only for diehard slasher fans and absolutely no one else.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Ice Cream Man worth watching?
Ice Cream Man is not worth watching for most people, and we scored it 34. Eli Roth has one idea, an ice cream van whose treats turn a suburb's children on their parents, and repeats it for 86 minutes with the same kill cut to the same beat. Only those who want practical gore and nothing else will get their money's worth.
How long is Ice Cream Man, and what is it rated?
Ice Cream Man runs 1h 26m and is rated NR by the MPA in the US. It is a horror and comedy film.
Where can I watch Ice Cream Man in the US?
Ice Cream Man is available to buy from Amazon Prime Video from $19.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Ice Cream Man, and is it suitable for children?
Ice Cream Man carries an 18 certificate and is not suitable for children. The violence is practical and plentiful, with children killing adults in their own kitchens with whatever is to hand, and the last stretch turns meaner than anything before it. Ari Millen's grinning ice cream man unnerved us early on, but the film is more repetitive than frightening.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Stuff (1985) · not reviewed yetLarry Cohen’s dessert-from-hell satire, cheaper than this and far cleverer about appetite.

  2. Who Can Kill a Child? (1976) · not reviewed yetThe Spanish killer-children film that takes the question in its title seriously.

  3. The Children (2008) · not reviewed yetA British Christmas in the country, small children, and real dread rather than gags.

  4. Village of the Damned (1960) · not reviewed yetBlond children, blank stares, and menace built from silence instead of blood.

  5. Thanksgiving (2023, Fi1m 70)Roth’s previous holiday horror, with set pieces that begin, build and end.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever