A man in a leather jacket carries two shotguns on his shoulders
Film review

Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels

1998 · Directed by Guy Ritchie · 1h 45m · MPA R

In a sentenceA great deal of criminal planning by men who should not be trusted with a shopping list

Four East End lads find themselves in debt to a mobster and devise a plan involving a drug shipment. Eddy (Nick Moran), Tom (Jason Flemyng), Soap (Dexter Fletcher) and Bacon (Jason Statham) try to think their way out of trouble while other crooks pursue schemes of their own. With several sets of criminals trying to outsmart one another, their plans become increasingly difficult to keep separate. Guy Ritchie writes and directs this crime comedy, with Vinnie Jones as Big Chris and P.H. Moriarty as ‘Hatchet’ Harry Lonsdale.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Guy Ritchie’s crime comedy earns its laughs through sharp casting and cleverly tangled plans. The camera tricks can become tiresome, and the people are thinly written, but there is plenty here for a caper enthusiast.

Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels is a good caper with an irritating need to keep proving how stylish it is. Guy Ritchie writes and directs as though every crook deserves an entrance and every scheme another complication. The pleasure is in watching men who fancy themselves clever discover that other people have been thinking too. Its crowded plotting takes some attention, but at 105 minutes the film offers enough laughs to repay it.

The trouble begins with four East End lads in debt to a mobster, followed by a plan involving a drug shipment. Ritchie gives the surrounding crooks competing schemes, then asks us to keep several calculations in our heads at once. This is familiar caper business, and we do not need every coincidence to survive police scrutiny. What matters is whether each new complication is funny or surprising enough to justify another, and it usually is.

Nick Moran’s Eddy, Jason Flemyng’s Tom, Dexter Fletcher’s Soap and Jason Statham’s Bacon make the four lads worth following through the complications. They are enjoyable company, even when the writing leaves them looking more like a group than four distinct people. We laughed most readily at Vinnie Jones’s Big Chris: his blunt presence makes the younger men’s swagger seem faintly ridiculous. Jones understands how little effort menace needs. The younger actors sometimes appear to be enjoying their criminal credentials more than inhabiting them, but that eagerness also suits the comedy.

Tim Maurice-Jones’s cinematography is caught up in Ritchie’s fondness for a swinging camera, freeze frames and slow motion. The tricks can be funny in themselves, but there are moments when we want a conversation to finish without being decorated. Niven Howie’s editing has the harder job of keeping the rival schemes legible. The pace helps, pulling us past a surplus introduction before it becomes a nuisance. It can also leave us remembering a face without quite remembering whose business we have interrupted.

Eve Mavrakis and Iain Andrews’s production design is useful precisely because it does not compete with all this activity. Their settings give the crooks somewhere credible to conduct their increasingly silly business. The music credited to David A. Hughes and John Murphy is much less inclined to stand back. Its insistence keeps the film buoyant when keeping track of the characters threatens to become work, although quieter moments would be welcome.

This sits at the farcical end of the crime film, where greed and vanity are enough to keep people moving. We need no moral lecture, but a little more curiosity about the men would have made their predicaments count for more. Ritchie prefers to get on with the next scheme, and his skill at doing that is considerable. Give it an evening if crooked plans and blunt threats make you laugh; some of the camera tricks will need forgiving.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

73
Positive
6
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Guy Ritchie’s crime caper, with praise centred on its energy, black humour and busy plotting. The favourable reviews find the interlocking schemes cleverly handled and the direction confident enough to give familiar gangster material a distinctive British character. The ensemble also attracts broad approval, while the music and camera flourishes contribute to a sense of fun that carries much of the film’s appeal.

The reservations concern how much that style delivers beyond immediate entertainment, and whether the crowded plot remains comprehensible. The spread runs from enthusiastic to mixed rather than outright hostile: some critics enjoy the orchestrated coincidences, while others find too many characters and too little reason to care about them. Total Film singles out Vinnie Jones for praise despite finding the balance of guns and gags uneven. Time Out, by contrast, considers his casting lazy and finds little depth beneath the laughs and thrills.

The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Joshua Klein
85*

The critic describes it as a hilarious, highly entertaining heist romp with complex interlocking plots and carefully orchestrated coincidences. They single out first-time director Guy Ritchie's stylish yet substantive approach, along with the fresh and funny performances by mostly unknown actors.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
80*

The critic calls it the freshest and most successful attempt at a Tarantinoid British gangster movie. Ritchie and the cast deliver freestyle energy and bizarro confidence in a self-contained, original world.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

This cheerfully amoral debut from Guy Ritchie is widely regarded as the best British crime movie since The Long Good Friday and has a youthful exuberance that's truly infectious. The superb cast is spiced up with celebrities such as Sting and Vinnie Jones in a well-received role.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
12 March 1999 · Roger Ebert
75*

The critic finds the complex caper film fun in a slapdash way with exuberance and style, comparing it to Tarantino crossed with the Marx Brothers. He praises the sense of fun, the music and narration, and the plausible performances by some of the older, more brutish characters while noting the young leads seem downy-cheeked and the plot labyrinthine.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
8 March 1999 · Anthony Lane
60*

The critic views the film as a carefully constructed entertainment for people who like beer commercials, noting its director's advertising background shows in the flashy style with swinging cameras, freeze frames and slow motion. He finds it not a proper movie but entertaining in its caper elements and sanguine shootout.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · CO'Su
60*

The film follows four East End lads who get into debt with a mobster and hatch a plan involving a drug shipment. Ritchie shows skill with the camera and soundtrack but the casting of Vinnie Jones feels lazy and the film lacks depth beyond laughs and thrills.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels worth watching?
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels is worth an evening for anyone who laughs at crooked plans and blunt threats, and we scored it 78. Guy Ritchie's tangled plotting and sharp casting earn the laughs, with Vinnie Jones's Big Chris the funniest presence. The camera tricks grow tiresome and the four lads are thinly written, so it suits caper enthusiasts more than anyone after character.
How long is Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, and what is it rated?
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels runs 1h 45m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a comedy and crime film.
Where can I watch Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels in the US?
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, and is it suitable for children?
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels carries an 18 certificate in the UK and an R in the US, and it is not suitable for children. It is a crime comedy about gangsters, a drug shipment and men making threats, so expect adult language and violence, played for laughs rather than dread. Teenagers and the squeamish should look elsewhere.
How does Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels compare to In Bruges?
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels is the busier and more farcical film, while In Bruges is the more moving. Ritchie keeps piling on schemes and camera tricks; Martin McDonagh gives his bickering hitmen room for guilt, and Colin Farrell and Brendan Gleeson supply the depth Ritchie's lads lack. Pick Ritchie for tangled fun, McDonagh for banter that leaves a mark.
What should I watch after Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels?
After Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, try The Lavender Hill Mob (1951, Fi1m 82): A quieter criminal enterprise, with equally unreliable confidence and better manners. Then In Bruges (2008, Fi1m 83): Criminal banter with more room for guilt and the people beneath it; and A Hard Day (2014, Fi1m 79): Bad decisions multiply quickly, with tighter suspense and considerably less swagger.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Lavender Hill Mob (1951, Fi1m 82)A quieter criminal enterprise, with equally unreliable confidence and better manners.

  2. Big Deal on Madonna Street (1958) · not reviewed yetAnother gang whose practical skills cannot support its ambitious criminal planning.

  3. The Silent Partner (1978) · not reviewed yetA colder caper where the threats deserve more than a nervous laugh.

  4. In Bruges (2008, Fi1m 83)Criminal banter with more room for guilt and the people beneath it.

  5. A Hard Day (2014, Fi1m 79)Bad decisions multiply quickly, with tighter suspense and considerably less swagger.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever